Re: [rules-users] Regarding BPEL

2011-10-24 Thread Sumeet Karawal
Thank you. This was really helpful.

Regards,
Sumeet
Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com



  
  From:   Mauricio Salatino sala...@gmail.com 
  

  
  To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org
  

  
  Date:   10/21/2011 04:15 PM   
  

  
  Subject:Re: [rules-users] Regarding BPEL  
  

  
  Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org   
  

  





Definitely we are not in the same page :)
BPMN is also a semi-structured language to define business processes (BP
from BPEL and BPMN). The version 2 of the standard defines the language and
the execution semantic for defining Business Processes with a wider scope
than BPEL. Of course that BPEL and BPMN are not the same, but I think that
you can achieve most of the things that you want to achieve with BPEL with
BPMN (I'm not sure what are you trying to achieve, but we can discuss that
in another thread). In the case of BPMN, Drools is not the one responsible
for the process execution and jBPM5 is. Where jBPM5 is right now a former
module of the Drools Project. jBPM5 provides you a generic process engine
capable of understanding more than one process definition language, but
right now the project is focused on running BPMN models. In other words,
jBPM5 is capable of running BPEL process, but right now the parsers for the
BPEL models are not in place. Most of the BPMS vendors are adopting BPMN as
a defacto notation and I think that for that reason jBPM5 is only focused
in this language now.

Hope it helps..

Cheers



On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Jamie js...@llbean.com wrote:
  I'm not sure your answer directly addresses the question.  BPMN and BPEL
  aren't the same thing - BPMN is an unstructured diagramming notation that
  an
  be directly executed from within Drools, where as BPEL is a
  semi-structured
  language.  While most BPMN flows can be translated to BPEL, not
  everything
  in BPMN can be represented in BPEL.  I don't believe that Drools can
  directly execute BPEL (but I'm sure others will correct me if I'm wrong
  about that)

  --
  View this message in context:
  
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Regarding-BPEL-tp3437430p3438367.html

  Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
  ___
  rules-users mailing list
  rules-users@lists.jboss.org
  https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



--
 - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
 - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- Co-Founder @ http://www.jugargentina.org
 - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar

 - Salatino Salaboy Mauricio -

___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




=-=-=
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain 
confidential or privileged information. If you are 
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, 
review, distribution, printing or copying of the 
information contained in this e-mail message 
and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If 
you have received this communication in error, 
please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and 
immediately and permanently delete the message 
and any attachments. Thank you




___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] Regarding BPEL

2011-10-24 Thread Mauricio Salatino
No problem Sumeet,
Feel free to open new threads if you have more questions, I'm really
passionate about these topics so I'm always open to discussions.

Cheers

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.comwrote:

 Thank you. This was really helpful.

 Regards,
 Sumeet
 Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com



  From:   Mauricio Salatino sala...@gmail.com

  To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org

  Date:   10/21/2011 04:15 PM

  Subject:Re: [rules-users] Regarding BPEL

  Sent by:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org






 Definitely we are not in the same page :)
 BPMN is also a semi-structured language to define business processes (BP
 from BPEL and BPMN). The version 2 of the standard defines the language and
 the execution semantic for defining Business Processes with a wider scope
 than BPEL. Of course that BPEL and BPMN are not the same, but I think that
 you can achieve most of the things that you want to achieve with BPEL with
 BPMN (I'm not sure what are you trying to achieve, but we can discuss that
 in another thread). In the case of BPMN, Drools is not the one responsible
 for the process execution and jBPM5 is. Where jBPM5 is right now a former
 module of the Drools Project. jBPM5 provides you a generic process engine
 capable of understanding more than one process definition language, but
 right now the project is focused on running BPMN models. In other words,
 jBPM5 is capable of running BPEL process, but right now the parsers for the
 BPEL models are not in place. Most of the BPMS vendors are adopting BPMN as
 a defacto notation and I think that for that reason jBPM5 is only focused
 in this language now.

 Hope it helps..

 Cheers



 On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Jamie js...@llbean.com wrote:
  I'm not sure your answer directly addresses the question.  BPMN and BPEL
  aren't the same thing - BPMN is an unstructured diagramming notation that
  an
  be directly executed from within Drools, where as BPEL is a
  semi-structured
  language.  While most BPMN flows can be translated to BPEL, not
  everything
  in BPMN can be represented in BPEL.  I don't believe that Drools can
  directly execute BPEL (but I'm sure others will correct me if I'm wrong
  about that)

  --
  View this message in context:

 http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Regarding-BPEL-tp3437430p3438367.html

  Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
  ___
  rules-users mailing list
  rules-users@lists.jboss.org
  https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



 --
  - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
  - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
 - Co-Founder @ http://www.jugargentina.org
  - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar

  - Salatino Salaboy Mauricio -

 ___
 rules-users mailing list
 rules-users@lists.jboss.org
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




 =-=-=
 Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
 message and/or attachments to it may contain
 confidential or privileged information. If you are
 not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
 review, distribution, printing or copying of the
 information contained in this e-mail message
 and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
 you have received this communication in error,
 please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
 immediately and permanently delete the message
 and any attachments. Thank you




 ___
 rules-users mailing list
 rules-users@lists.jboss.org
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




-- 
 - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
 - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- Co-Founder @ http://www.jugargentina.org
 - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar

 - Salatino Salaboy Mauricio -
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] Regarding BPEL

2011-10-21 Thread Mauricio Salatino
Definitely we are not in the same page :)
BPMN is also a semi-structured language to define business processes (BP
from BPEL and BPMN). The version 2 of the standard defines the language and
the execution semantic for defining Business Processes with a wider scope
than BPEL. Of course that BPEL and BPMN are not the same, but I think that
you can achieve most of the things that you want to achieve with BPEL with
BPMN (I'm not sure what are you trying to achieve, but we can discuss that
in another thread). In the case of BPMN, Drools is not the one responsible
for the process execution and jBPM5 is. Where jBPM5 is right now a former
module of the Drools Project. jBPM5 provides you a generic process engine
capable of understanding more than one process definition language, but
right now the project is focused on running BPMN models. In other words,
jBPM5 is capable of running BPEL process, but right now the parsers for the
BPEL models are not in place. Most of the BPMS vendors are adopting BPMN as
a defacto notation and I think that for that reason jBPM5 is only focused in
this language now.

Hope it helps..

Cheers



On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Jamie js...@llbean.com wrote:

 I'm not sure your answer directly addresses the question.  BPMN and BPEL
 aren't the same thing - BPMN is an unstructured diagramming notation that
 an
 be directly executed from within Drools, where as BPEL is a semi-structured
 language.  While most BPMN flows can be translated to BPEL, not everything
 in BPMN can be represented in BPEL.  I don't believe that Drools can
 directly execute BPEL (but I'm sure others will correct me if I'm wrong
 about that)

 --
 View this message in context:
 http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Regarding-BPEL-tp3437430p3438367.html
 Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 ___
 rules-users mailing list
 rules-users@lists.jboss.org
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




-- 
 - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
 - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- Co-Founder @ http://www.jugargentina.org
 - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar

 - Salatino Salaboy Mauricio -
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


[rules-users] Regarding BPEL

2011-10-20 Thread Sumeet Karawal

Hi,

I required some information whether jBPM supports BPEL. I searched and
found something regarding its use in jBPM v3.x. But got nothing regarding
BPEL for versions 4.x and 5.x.  Is jBPM compatible with BPEL or is there
anyway to have BPEL functionality with jBPM.

jBPM creates the process using JPDL. Is it better in someway or the other
than BPEL ? Could anybody please help me on this.

Thanks  Regards,
Sumeet Karawal
Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com

=-=-=
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain 
confidential or privileged information. If you are 
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, 
review, distribution, printing or copying of the 
information contained in this e-mail message 
and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If 
you have received this communication in error, 
please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and 
immediately and permanently delete the message 
and any attachments. Thank you



___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] Regarding BPEL

2011-10-20 Thread Mauricio Salatino
jBPM5 is focused on the standard BPMN 2.0 that is being adopted by most of
the BPM vendors.
jPDL was a proprietary language and for that reason it will be left in the
future.
Cheers


On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Sumeet Karawal sumeet.kara...@tcs.comwrote:


 Hi,

 I required some information whether jBPM supports BPEL. I searched and
 found something regarding its use in jBPM v3.x. But got nothing regarding
 BPEL for versions 4.x and 5.x.  Is jBPM compatible with BPEL or is there
 anyway to have BPEL functionality with jBPM.

 jBPM creates the process using JPDL. Is it better in someway or the other
 than BPEL ? Could anybody please help me on this.

 Thanks  Regards,
 Sumeet Karawal
 Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com

 =-=-=
 Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
 message and/or attachments to it may contain
 confidential or privileged information. If you are
 not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
 review, distribution, printing or copying of the
 information contained in this e-mail message
 and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
 you have received this communication in error,
 please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
 immediately and permanently delete the message
 and any attachments. Thank you



 ___
 rules-users mailing list
 rules-users@lists.jboss.org
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




-- 
 - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
 - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- Co-Founder @ http://www.jugargentina.org
 - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar

 - Salatino Salaboy Mauricio -
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


Re: [rules-users] Regarding BPEL

2011-10-20 Thread Jamie
I'm not sure your answer directly addresses the question.  BPMN and BPEL
aren't the same thing - BPMN is an unstructured diagramming notation that an
be directly executed from within Drools, where as BPEL is a semi-structured
language.  While most BPMN flows can be translated to BPEL, not everything
in BPMN can be represented in BPEL.  I don't believe that Drools can
directly execute BPEL (but I'm sure others will correct me if I'm wrong
about that)

--
View this message in context: 
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Regarding-BPEL-tp3437430p3438367.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users