Re: [rules-users] Strange behaviour with maximumSecondsSpend termination in combination with PlanningVariableListener
Here you can find the code that compiles with the 6.1.0.CR1 version CPTest.zip http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4030151/CPTest.zip In case anyone is interested, the jira issue can be found here: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLANNER-248 -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Strange-behaviour-with-maximumSecondsSpend-termination-in-combination-with-PlanningVariableListener-tp4030128p4030151.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Strange behaviour with maximumSecondsSpend termination in combination with PlanningVariableListener
When i use the maximumSecondsSpend termination variable in the solverconfig it doesnt always fully process the methods in the PlanningVariableListenerEntity. Most of the time it gives me a solution with semi done shadow variables but not always. However when i change the termination to require a scoreAttained it always gives me a solution with the correct processed shadow variables. Any ideas why this might happen? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Strange-behaviour-with-maximumSecondsSpend-termination-in-combination-with-PlanningVariableListener-tp4030128.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Strange behaviour with maximumSecondsSpend termination in combination with PlanningVariableListener
On 23-06-14 09:32, dBijkoo wrote: When i use the maximumSecondsSpend termination variable in the solverconfig it doesnt always fully process the methods in the PlanningVariableListenerEntity. Most of the time it gives me a solution with semi done shadow variables but not always. However when i change the termination to require a scoreAttained it always gives me a solution with the correct processed shadow variables. Any ideas why this might happen? That's impossible. If it does, it's a bug. The VariableListeners should always fire if a variable changed. The terminations are checked between every move scope (and every step scope too of course), and the variable listeners fire in the same move scope as their variable are changed, so again, that's impossible :) Can you can create a reproducer which uses the latest version (6.1.0.CR1) and attach it to a jira issue? https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLANNER A reproducer is a zip with something that I can run easily locally offline (preferably with as little as complexity as needed and as little data as needed). -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Strange-behaviour-with-maximumSecondsSpend-termination-in-combination-with-PlanningVariableListener-tp4030128.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Strange behaviour with maximumSecondsSpend termination in combination with PlanningVariableListener
I just upgraded to 6.1.0.CR1 and the problem still occurs. maximumSecondsSpend gives an incorrect solution while scoreAttained does not after 15+ times trying both. I will make a jira issue about it. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Strange-behaviour-with-maximumSecondsSpend-termination-in-combination-with-PlanningVariableListener-tp4030128p4030135.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
