Re: [rules-users] Test Scenarios with Rule Flows in 5.1.1 Guvnor
The question is, when are you firing all the rules(activations)? In other words, when are you calling the fireAllRules() method? Greetings. On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:42 AM, kylin8627live kylin8...@live.com wrote: Hi Jeff, I met the same problem. I added the rule you mention to Guvnor and it is able to triggered nodes in my ruleflow. However, still no rules were fired. I guess rules are not assigned to ruleflow-groups because it mentions [size=0]. In rules I set up ruleflow-group properties and they work fine in Eclipse. Am I missing something? Following is a part of audit log FIRING rule: [StartProcess] activationId:StartProcess [0] declarations: BEFORE RULEFLOW STARTED process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:Start[id=1] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:CorrectInitQuestion[id=2] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:CorrectInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:CorrectInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:CorrectInitQuestion[id=2] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] AFTER RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:Start[id=1] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] AFTER RULEFLOW STARTED process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:CorrectInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:CorrectInitQuestion[size=0] null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:WrongInitQuestion[id=14] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:WrongInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:WrongInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:WrongInitQuestion[id=14] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:WrongInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:WrongInitQuestion[size=0] null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] Does null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] indicate anything? Really appreciated if someone can provide some helps. Best, Weilin -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Test-Scenarios-with-Rule-Flows-in-5-1-1-Guvnor-tp2754820p2757301.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar - Salatino Salaboy Mauricio - ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Test Scenarios with Rule Flows in 5.1.1 Guvnor
I know you said this is only part of the audit log but I don't see any facts inserted or rules being activated. The fact insertion statements should appear before the StartProcess rule is activated. Can you paste the entire audit log for running the test scenario? On Mar 30, 2011, at 11:42 PM, kylin8627live wrote: Hi Jeff, I met the same problem. I added the rule you mention to Guvnor and it is able to triggered nodes in my ruleflow. However, still no rules were fired. I guess rules are not assigned to ruleflow-groups because it mentions [size=0]. In rules I set up ruleflow-group properties and they work fine in Eclipse. Am I missing something? Following is a part of audit log FIRING rule: [StartProcess] activationId:StartProcess [0] declarations: BEFORE RULEFLOW STARTED process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:Start[id=1] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:CorrectInitQuestion[id=2] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:CorrectInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:CorrectInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:CorrectInitQuestion[id=2] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] AFTER RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:Start[id=1] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] AFTER RULEFLOW STARTED process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:CorrectInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:CorrectInitQuestion[size=0] null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:WrongInitQuestion[id=14] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:WrongInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:WrongInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:WrongInitQuestion[id=14] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:WrongInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:WrongInitQuestion[size=0] null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] Does null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] indicate anything? Really appreciated if someone can provide some helps. Best, Weilin -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Test-Scenarios-with-Rule-Flows-in-5-1-1-Guvnor-tp2754820p2757301.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Test Scenarios with Rule Flows in 5.1.1 Guvnor
This morning I tested it, it works fine. My startProcess rule like this. rule StartProcess salience 100 when eval(true); then #kcontext.getKnowledgeRuntime().startProcess(ProcessName); drools.getWorkingMemory().startProcess(ProcessName); drools.getWorkingMemory().fireAllRules(); end Then all rules are assigned to each workflow-group. Thanks everyone for providing me help! Weilin -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Test-Scenarios-with-Rule-Flows-in-5-1-1-Guvnor-tp2754820p2759724.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] Test Scenarios with Rule Flows in 5.1.1 Guvnor
Hi all, I had (hopefully) a quick question about trying to test rules in rule flows in Guvnor with Drools 5.1.1. I have a simple 4 step rule flow (Start-RuleGroup1-RuleGroup2-End) with 1 rule in each Rule group. When I set up the test scenario to fire the first rule, which will trigger the second rule, activate RuleGroup1, and run the scenario, it doesn't trigger the RuleFlow and fire the rule. I've also tried activating Start instead, but neither of them trigger the RuleFlow. I know from experience that Rule Flows don't seem to work with 5.0, but with the addition of the entry options, I thought they would with 5.1.1. Am I mistaken? Also, when I look at the Audit Log, I see the Rule Flow activated and deactivated before any of the facts are asserted: BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:Start[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:Start[size=0] BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:Start[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:Start[size=0] OBJECT ASSERTED value:com.test.Game@47244724 factId: 1 OBJECT ASSERTED value:com.test.Customer@4c584c58 factId: 2 Could this be part of the problem? Thanks! inline: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 1.jpginline: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 2.jpginline: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 3.jpginline: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 4.jpginline: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 5.jpginline: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 6.jpg___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Test Scenarios with Rule Flows in 5.1.1 Guvnor
Add a rule with a higher salience that starts the rule flow process rule StartProcess salience 100 when #conditions then #actions kcontext.getKnowledgeRuntime().startProcess(processname); end And add it to your package. Activate is for test scenarios that test individual rules that are part of a ruleflow group. For example, you want to test your second rule independent of the rule flow process, then activate RuleFlowGroup2 (and provide a set of facts that cause the rule in RuleFlowGroup2 to execute). Jeff On Mar 30, 2011, at 11:53 AM, John Peterson wrote: Hi all, I had (hopefully) a quick question about trying to test rules in rule flows in Guvnor with Drools 5.1.1. I have a simple 4 step rule flow (Start-RuleGroup1-RuleGroup2-End) with 1 rule in each Rule group. When I set up the test scenario to fire the first rule, which will trigger the second rule, activate “RuleGroup1”, and run the scenario, it doesn’t trigger the RuleFlow and fire the rule. I’ve also tried activating “Start” instead, but neither of them trigger the RuleFlow. I know from experience that Rule Flows don’t seem to work with 5.0, but with the addition of the entry options, I thought they would with 5.1.1. Am I mistaken? Also, when I look at the Audit Log, I see the Rule Flow activated and deactivated before any of the facts are asserted: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 1.jpg BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:Start[size=0] Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 2.jpg AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:Start[size=0] Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 3.jpg BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:Start[size=0] Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 4.jpg AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:Start[size=0] Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 5.jpg OBJECT ASSERTED value:com.test.Game@47244724 factId: 1 Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 6.jpg OBJECT ASSERTED value:com.test.Customer@4c584c58 factId: 2 Could this be part of the problem? Thanks! ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Test Scenarios with Rule Flows in 5.1.1 Guvnor
Hi Jeff, I met the same problem. I added the rule you mention to Guvnor and it is able to triggered nodes in my ruleflow. However, still no rules were fired. I guess rules are not assigned to ruleflow-groups because it mentions [size=0]. In rules I set up ruleflow-group properties and they work fine in Eclipse. Am I missing something? Following is a part of audit log FIRING rule: [StartProcess] activationId:StartProcess [0] declarations: BEFORE RULEFLOW STARTED process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:Start[id=1] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:CorrectInitQuestion[id=2] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:CorrectInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:CorrectInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:CorrectInitQuestion[id=2] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] AFTER RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:Start[id=1] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] AFTER RULEFLOW STARTED process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:CorrectInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:CorrectInitQuestion[size=0] null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:WrongInitQuestion[id=14] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:WrongInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP ACTIVATED group:WrongInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW NODE TRIGGERED node:WrongInitQuestion[id=14] process:flow[id=eLearningWF] null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] BEFORE RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:WrongInitQuestion[size=0] AFTER RULEFLOW GROUP DEACTIVATED group:WrongInitQuestion[size=0] null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] Does null process:flow[id=eLearningWF] indicate anything? Really appreciated if someone can provide some helps. Best, Weilin -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Test-Scenarios-with-Rule-Flows-in-5-1-1-Guvnor-tp2754820p2757301.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
