Re: [rules-users] rule fires while condition is false
Hi there, er.. why don't you remove your eval and just evaluate in the object binding? $var = TypeOfObject( netRepaymentAmountAbilityIncludingLiabilities = 0.65) Other than that, i don't think a lotta people are still using drools4 and i have no idea why that is happening. Apparently, it makes no sense :-/ _ miguel On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:53 AM, Shai Bentin s...@centimia.com wrote: I'm running drools 4. It has been running for a long time with no issues. I have this weird issue now and I'm wondering what can explain this. I have the following rule defined. rule netRepaymentWithLiabilities1 agenda-group autoUnderwriting when #conditions enrichedApplication: EnrichedApplicationVersionTO() eval (enrichedApplication.getNetRepaymentAmountAbilityIncludingLiabilities() = 0.65) decision: Decision() then #actions System.out.println(!! + (enrichedApplication.getNetRepaymentAmountAbilityIncludingLiabilities() = 0.65)); decision.setDecision(APPROVED, NetRepaymentWthLiblt); end This rule invokes although 'enrichedApplication.getNetRepaymentAmountAbilityIncludingLiabilities()' 1. More over in the then part it prints 'false', so how come it invoked while the condition is not fulfilled? What can cause this? Shai ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- To understand what is recursion you must first understand recursion ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] rule fires while condition is false
Could the rules be changing the values outside of a modify block? Please try this (untested) rule as a test. It binds the value on the left hand side. rule netRepaymentWithLiabilities1TEST agenda-group autoUnderwriting when ea: EnrichedApplicationVersionTO(amount : netRepaymentAmountAbilityIncludingLiabilities = 0.65) decision: Decision() then System.out.println(!!! + amount + !!! + ea.getNetRepaymentAmountAbilityIncludingLiabilities() ); decision.setDecision(APPROVED, NetRepaymentWthLiblt); end ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] rule fires while condition is false
Thanks, I did this and saw that 'amount' was 0, although netRepayment was 1.04, after looking at it a bit further I found the problem. When I create the workspace I insert EnrichedApplicationVersion, I run some rules from a different agenda and then I cleared the agenda (however did not retract the enrichedApplication). I then do some more things and insert the value of NetRepayment value to the EnrichedApplication, I re insert it to the workspace and then I run the rules. It seems that drools did not re evaluate the EnrichedApplication again and thus the value of NetRepayement as fas as it was concerned was 0. retracting EnrichedApplication or creating a new workspace solves this problem. Thanks. Shai בתאריך 06/05/10 17:13, ציטוט Jared Davis: Could the rules be changing the values outside of a modify block? Please try this (untested) rule as a test. It binds the value on the left hand side. rule netRepaymentWithLiabilities1TEST agenda-group autoUnderwriting when ea: EnrichedApplicationVersionTO(amount : netRepaymentAmountAbilityIncludingLiabilities = 0.65) decision: Decision() then System.out.println(!!! + amount + !!! + ea.getNetRepaymentAmountAbilityIncludingLiabilities() ); decision.setDecision(APPROVED, NetRepaymentWthLiblt); end ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] rule fires while condition is false
Shai wrote: --snip-- I then do some more things and insert the value of NetRepayment value to the EnrichedApplication, I re insert it to the workspace and then I run the rules. It seems that drools did not re evaluate the EnrichedApplication again and thus the value of NetRepayement as fas as it was concerned was 0. --snip-- For the rules engine to re-evaluate objects, you need to tell it when they change. Even though the NetRepayment fact was updated in the engine, there is no link defined in the rules engine between it and the EnrichedApplication. I'm assuming the calculation method getNetRepaymentAmountAbilityIncludingLiabilities() uses this value. Perhaps it would be worth investigating moving the method implementation to a rule. If not, ensure that all object/variables used in the method do not change once the EnrichedApplication is inserted. -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/rule-fires-while-condition-is-false-tp780685p781431.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] rule fires while condition is false
I think you need to use modify for that to happen. Otherwise, it doesn't get re-evaluated. Or maybe it did, but you're using the no-loop / lock-on-active attributes. _ miguel On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Shai Bentin s...@centimia.com wrote: It seems that drools did not re evaluate the EnrichedApplication again and thus the value of NetRepayement as fas as it was concerned was 0. -- To understand what is recursion you must first understand recursion ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] rule fires while condition is false
I'm running drools 4. It has been running for a long time with no issues. I have this weird issue now and I'm wondering what can explain this. I have the following rule defined. rule netRepaymentWithLiabilities1 agenda-group autoUnderwriting when #conditions enrichedApplication: EnrichedApplicationVersionTO() eval (enrichedApplication.getNetRepaymentAmountAbilityIncludingLiabilities() = 0.65) decision: Decision() then #actions System.out.println(!! + (enrichedApplication.getNetRepaymentAmountAbilityIncludingLiabilities() = 0.65)); decision.setDecision(APPROVED, NetRepaymentWthLiblt); end This rule invokes although 'enrichedApplication.getNetRepaymentAmountAbilityIncludingLiabilities()' 1. More over in the then part it prints 'false', so how come it invoked while the condition is not fulfilled? What can cause this? Shai ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
