[rules-users] How to generate rules from decision tables where LHS has no field constraints

2007-02-14 Thread Martin Weidner
Hello, Maybe I have overlooked something, but I couldn't find a way to generate a simple rule from an excel decision table, where the left hand side contains no field constraints? i.e. rule do we have cheese WHEN cheese: Cheese() THEN RHS End Is there a way to achieve

Re: [rules-users] Rules Repository and Rule Modeller

2007-02-14 Thread Michael Neale
yeah, very much so. Hopefully have a demo of it in M2 or M3. I have been meaning to update the blog with the latest on package management, but haven't found time, I will do ASAP. On 2/15/07, Anstis, Michael (M.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Just a note to enquire as to the status of the

Re: [rules-users] DROOLS 3.1M new syntax Decision Tables

2007-02-14 Thread Michael Neale
it should - as it just generates rules, it doesn't interpret them when processing the DTs. On 2/15/07, Olenin, Vladimir (MOH) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I wonder if new syntax (specifically – 'accumulate' keyword) works correctly with Decision Tables? Can the new keywords be used in

Re: [rules-users] How to generate rules from decision tables where LHS has no field constraints

2007-02-14 Thread Michael Neale
you should be able to do that - just leave the constraint cells empty, or put some comment in them. On 2/14/07, Martin Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Maybe I have overlooked something, but I couldn't find a way to generate a simple rule from an excel decision table, where the left

Re: [rules-users] Short-circuit rules by group?!

2007-02-14 Thread Michael Neale
activation-group may be what you are looking for. For things in the one activation group, only one rule is guaranteed to fire. eg: activation-group NIKE its an attribute like no-loop etc. On 2/14/07, jdepaul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have several rules defined in groups by Customer,

Re: [rules-users] Focus before assertion - for pattern matching

2007-02-14 Thread Steven Williams
I am pretty sure that all rules in all agenda groups run pattern matching and only those in the current agenda-group execute (at least that is the default behaviour). You can see this by using the audit logging feature. cheers Steve On 2/15/07, Michael Neale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: not quite