[rules-users] ruleflow-group vs. agenda-group vs. activation-group
Hi I am trying to understand groups available in drool to implement them as per my requirement. Can you please share more details on ruleflow,agenda and activation group and what are the main differences in them. Thanks, Vishal ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] ruleflow-group vs. agenda-group vs. activation-group ?
Hi All, I've been experimenting with agenda-group and ruleflow-group features and I am now a bit confused. The documentation states that agenda-group and ruleflow-group features have been merged, but I'm not sure how this relates to activation groups. ruleflow-groups used to be a rule-flow feature, driven by the .RF file, requiring JBPM engine behind the scenes. Agenda-group work without the presence of JBPM: does it mean we can use the RF file for visualizing the agenda-groups as well? Could someone please shed some light on the differences between these constructs? Which one is the currently recommended approach (when?) for controlling rule execution flow? Thanks, Peter ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] ruleflow-group vs. agenda-group vs. activation-group ?
On 3 Jun 2014, at 13:16, Péter Gergely, Horváth h.pe...@mailbox.hu wrote: Hi All, I've been experimenting with agenda-group and ruleflow-group features and I am now a bit confused. The documentation states that agenda-group and ruleflow-group features have been merged, but I'm not sure how this relates to activation groups. it doesn’t. That is a separate thing, and unchanged. ruleflow-groups used to be a rule-flow feature, driven by the .RF file, requiring JBPM engine behind the scenes. Agenda-group work without the presence of JBPM: does it mean we can use the RF file for visualizing the agenda-groups as well? All it means is that the rule flow now calls setFocus() when it reaches a ruleflow-group. Could someone please shed some light on the differences between these constructs? Which one is the currently recommended approach (when?) for controlling rule execution flow? So an ruleflow-group and an agenda-group are now the same thing. RuleFlow is an additional thing to orchestrate the calling of the ruleflow/agenda-group. Thanks, Peter ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
