Nanomsg looks interesting and I'll take a closer look. But I'm interested
in a pure rust implementation of async messaging because I'd like to create
an embedded OS using rust and not use C if possible.
I been thinking about the problem and one of the questions I have is how to
transfer ownership
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Wink Saville w...@saville.com wrote:
Nanomsg looks interesting and I'll take a closer look. But I'm interested in
a pure rust implementation of async messaging because I'd like to create an
embedded OS using rust and not use C if possible.
I think even
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Wink Saville w...@saville.com wrote:
Nanomsg looks interesting and I'll take a closer look. But I'm interested
in a pure rust implementation of async messaging because I'd like to create
an embedded OS using rust and not use C if possible
You might take a look
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Paul Colomiets p...@colomiets.name wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Wink Saville w...@saville.com wrote:
Nanomsg looks interesting and I'll take a closer look. But I'm
interested in
a pure rust implementation of async messaging because I'd like
These are the semantics of a boxed value.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Wink Saville w...@saville.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Paul Colomiets p...@colomiets.name wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Wink Saville w...@saville.com wrote:
Nanomsg looks interesting
Cool, I've been following capn proto and have used protobufs a little. This
is the direction of what I'm thinking and I'm wondering if the rust notion
of
ownership can be leveraged in message passing. Hence my silly questions.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Tony Arcieri basc...@gmail.com wrote:
Perfect!
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Clark Gaebel cg.wowus...@gmail.com wrote:
These are the semantics of a boxed value.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Wink Saville w...@saville.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Paul Colomiets p...@colomiets.name
wrote:
Hi,
On
Sidebar on SBuf: I'd be curious how it could be written completely in terms
of MemoryMap, or if MemoryMap needs to be extended to support mprotect() /
VirtualProtect().
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Tony Arcieri basc...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been trying to keep an eye on what's been brewing
On 30/09/14 01:44 AM, Tony Arcieri wrote:
Sidebar on SBuf: I'd be curious how it could be written completely in
terms of MemoryMap, or if MemoryMap needs to be extended to support
mprotect() / VirtualProtect().
MemoryMap doesn't support controlling memory protections.
signature.asc
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Daniel Micay danielmi...@gmail.com
wrote:
MemoryMap doesn't support controlling memory protections.
Will it ever, or is the recommended approach to brew your own
MemoryMap-alike like SBuf is presently doing?
___
10 matches
Mail list logo