Re: [rust-dev] Async Message passing.

2014-09-29 Thread Wink Saville
Nanomsg looks interesting and I'll take a closer look. But I'm interested in a pure rust implementation of async messaging because I'd like to create an embedded OS using rust and not use C if possible. I been thinking about the problem and one of the questions I have is how to transfer ownership

Re: [rust-dev] Async Message passing.

2014-09-29 Thread Paul Colomiets
Hi, On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Wink Saville w...@saville.com wrote: Nanomsg looks interesting and I'll take a closer look. But I'm interested in a pure rust implementation of async messaging because I'd like to create an embedded OS using rust and not use C if possible. I think even

Re: [rust-dev] Async Message passing.

2014-09-29 Thread Tony Arcieri
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Wink Saville w...@saville.com wrote: Nanomsg looks interesting and I'll take a closer look. But I'm interested in a pure rust implementation of async messaging because I'd like to create an embedded OS using rust and not use C if possible You might take a look

Re: [rust-dev] Async Message passing.

2014-09-29 Thread Wink Saville
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Paul Colomiets p...@colomiets.name wrote: Hi, On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Wink Saville w...@saville.com wrote: Nanomsg looks interesting and I'll take a closer look. But I'm interested in a pure rust implementation of async messaging because I'd like

Re: [rust-dev] Async Message passing.

2014-09-29 Thread Clark Gaebel
These are the semantics of a boxed value. On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Wink Saville w...@saville.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Paul Colomiets p...@colomiets.name wrote: Hi, On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Wink Saville w...@saville.com wrote: Nanomsg looks interesting

Re: [rust-dev] Async Message passing.

2014-09-29 Thread Wink Saville
Cool, I've been following capn proto and have used protobufs a little. This is the direction of what I'm thinking and I'm wondering if the rust notion of ownership can be leveraged in message passing. Hence my silly questions. On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Tony Arcieri basc...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [rust-dev] Async Message passing.

2014-09-29 Thread Wink Saville
Perfect! On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Clark Gaebel cg.wowus...@gmail.com wrote: These are the semantics of a boxed value. On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Wink Saville w...@saville.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Paul Colomiets p...@colomiets.name wrote: Hi, On

Re: [rust-dev] Rust crypto highlights

2014-09-29 Thread Tony Arcieri
Sidebar on SBuf: I'd be curious how it could be written completely in terms of MemoryMap, or if MemoryMap needs to be extended to support mprotect() / VirtualProtect(). On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Tony Arcieri basc...@gmail.com wrote: I've been trying to keep an eye on what's been brewing

Re: [rust-dev] Rust crypto highlights

2014-09-29 Thread Daniel Micay
On 30/09/14 01:44 AM, Tony Arcieri wrote: Sidebar on SBuf: I'd be curious how it could be written completely in terms of MemoryMap, or if MemoryMap needs to be extended to support mprotect() / VirtualProtect(). MemoryMap doesn't support controlling memory protections. signature.asc

Re: [rust-dev] Rust crypto highlights

2014-09-29 Thread Tony Arcieri
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Daniel Micay danielmi...@gmail.com wrote: MemoryMap doesn't support controlling memory protections. Will it ever, or is the recommended approach to brew your own MemoryMap-alike like SBuf is presently doing? ___