On 3/19/12 7:22 PM, Graydon Hoare wrote:
Beyond this, I think the widening rules or any form of in-expression
promotion in general is too hazardous. Literals are the pain point.
Sounds good. Safely promoting literals would be a big help.
chris
___
On 3/19/12 7:22 PM, Graydon Hoare wrote:
Beyond this, I think the widening rules or any form of in-expression
promotion in general is too hazardous. Literals are the pain point.
I've been working on a refactoring of the ty/typeck modules that should
make inference for literals relatively easy
On 3/19/12 6:56 PM, Tim Chevalier wrote:
I don't think we have any plans to add implicit casts as implied by
your other 4 examples. It seems too complex -- if any of the variables
in your example were mutated after being initialized, the pass that
would insert these casts would get pretty
On 12-03-19 07:00 PM, Patrick Walton wrote:
On 3/19/12 6:56 PM, Tim Chevalier wrote:
I don't think we have any plans to add implicit casts as implied by
your other 4 examples. It seems too complex -- if any of the variables
in your example were mutated after being initialized, the pass that
