PS: What would be, in fact, the rusty way for a simplissim linked list. I use
Option~Cell for now, to have something clean (None) to end the list, since
Rust looks rather functional. But as always with Option this way quite obscures
and complicates the code (Some() expressions, match
For linked lists with no cycles, why not use OptionRcT (or RcMut)?
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote:
PS: What would be, in fact, the rusty way for a simplissim linked list. I
use Option~Cell for now, to have something clean (None) to end the list,
since Rust
#[feature(managed_boxes)];
#[deriving(Clone)]
struct Foo;
impl Drop for Foo {
fn drop(mut self) { }
}
fn main() {
let x = ~Foo;
let y = @Foo;
let _z = Foo;
let z = _z;
// needs a clone since just `a = x` would be a move
let a: ~Foo = x.clone();
// just copies
I'd suggest extra::list, but it looks a little dated.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Oren Ben-Kiki o...@ben-kiki.org wrote:
For linked lists with no cycles, why not use OptionRcT (or RcMut)?
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote:
PS: What would be, in fact,
