Are the libUV bindings for the socket API the default canonical way in Rust
for managing socket communications, or will there be a future
implementation or binding to the standard POSIX socket library?
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Thad Guidry thadgui...@gmail.com wrote:
oops, that should
Wow! the community here is more active than I had anticipated!
I have read responses from you guys.
The community's main concern is that pass-by-value should be the
default desired behavior. Thus explicitness here helps in reasoning
program flow. However, with deep-immutable variables, it should
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Patrick Walton pwal...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 4/7/13 7:49 AM, Mikhail Zabaluev wrote:
Hi,
I've started playing with Rust bindings to GObject:
https://github.com/mzabaluev/grust
The intent is to make any API that provides a GObject introspection
safely usable
On 6 April 2013 03:13, Andres Osinski andres.osin...@gmail.com wrote:
I just wanted to know if anyone was familiar with the FCGI protocol, and if
there's any reference as to how to manage the packing and unpacking of C
data structures, as well as if you know of any implementation for a similar
There's a very basic POSIX socket binding at
https://github.com/jdm/rust-socket. It's been neglected for a bit, I would
quickly merge a PR to update it to 0.6.
Cheers,
Josh
On 8 April 2013 02:14, Andres Osinski andres.osin...@gmail.com wrote:
Are the libUV bindings for the socket API the
Has anyone here taken a look at this yet?
http://attractivechaos.wordpress.com/2013/04/06/performance-of-rust-and-dart-in-sudoku-solving/
Just came in on 6 April 2013 for rust 0.6 . Read it a few days back
and it had instantly gotten me interested in Rust. Thought it would be
good to share, even
There's a thread called 'New Benchmark' that nobody replied to, but links
to HN where most of the people replied.
___
Rust-dev mailing list
Rust-dev@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
On 4/8/13 9:47 AM, Heri Sim wrote:
Has anyone here taken a look at this yet?
http://attractivechaos.wordpress.com/2013/04/06/performance-of-rust-and-dart-in-sudoku-solving/
Just came in on 6 April 2013 for rust 0.6 . Read it a few days back
and it had instantly gotten me interested in Rust.
Початкове повідомлення
Тема: Re: [rust-dev] rust-0.6 compilation with system LLVM fails
Дата: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 13:03:31 +0200
Від: Jauhien Piatlicki jpiatli...@gmail.com
Кому: Steve Klabnik st...@steveklabnik.com
As far as I can see Rust just provides another interface to
On 04/07/2013 08:03 PM, Steve Klabnik wrote:
Doesn't Rust still use custom patches to LLVM? Does your system LLVM
have those patches?
Rust 0.6's patches are pretty minimal, so it *might* be possible to run
something from upstream, though it would likely need to be whatever
revision our
Hi Patrick,
2013/4/8 Patrick Walton pwal...@mozilla.com
This is a use case for the `#[nonsendable]` or `#[nonowned]` annotation on
structs. This annotation isn't implemented yet, but it's a common feature
request, as it will be needed for non-thread-safe reference-counted smart
pointers too.
What do you mean when you say that the page is read-only? AFAIK all pages
on the wiki are read+write, and I don't see any controls to change that.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Olivier Renaud o.ren...@gmx.fr wrote:
Hi,
I saw the [wanted libraries] page on the github wiki, and I'd like to
On 13-04-08 12:25 PM, Benjamin Striegel wrote:
What do you mean when you say that the page is read-only? AFAIK all
pages on the wiki are read+write, and I don't see any controls to change
that.
At the very least, one must be logged in with a github account to edit
anything.
-r
What do you mean when you say that the page is read-only? AFAIK all
pages on the wiki are read+write, and I don't see any controls to change
that.
At the very least, one must be logged in with a github account to edit
anything.
-r
Oh you are right, the page is writeable.
Actually, I was
Would making idiomatic bindings to gettext on Unix platforms qualify for
transaltions, or is the core team more interested in cross-platform Rust
libraries from the start?
Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar (http://www.movistar.com.ar)
-Original Message-
From: Olivier Renaud
Hi, I know that if I have the following basic program :
***
///hello.rs
fn main(){
io::println(Hello);
}
***
then the command :
rustc hello.rs
produces an executable called hello which I can then run in ubuntu,
How would I compile it so that I can then use gdb to debug,
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Artella Coding
artella.cod...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi, I know that if I have the following basic program :
***
///hello.rs
fn main(){
io::println(Hello);
}
***
then the command :
rustc hello.rs
produces an executable called hello
We don't have higher-kinded type parameters. It's a common feature
request. I would personally be in favor of taking a patch to add the
feature.
Have there been many discussions about this on the mailing list about this
feature? Is it lack of interest by the language designedrs, lack of
18 matches
Mail list logo
