Thanks. This is a good idea.
On 01/19/2014 04:52 AM, Flaper87 wrote:
Hey,
I've been doing reviews for a bit and I just realized we, as
community, don't have a review checklist that all reviewers should go
through. I thought that it could be useful to have a wiki page
describing the review pr
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Patrick Walton wrote:
> I think we need some specific examples. I personally think that between
> the colored output, printing of the erroneous lines, spelling corrections,
> suggestions of `.clone()` and so forth, rustc actually has some of the best
> diagnostics
On 1/21/14 9:48 PM, Tony Arcieri wrote:
I think the biggest thing I've struggled with learning Rust is what I
will call, for lack of a better phrase, "shit rustc says". Reading Steve
Klabnik's tutorial and some blog posts about earlier versions of rust,
it's clear that the error messages have imp
I see there's some work underway of this nature ;)
https://github.com/mozilla/rust/pull/11718
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Tony Arcieri wrote:
> I think the biggest thing I've struggled with learning Rust is what I will
> call, for lack of a better phrase, "shit rustc says". Reading Steve
I think the biggest thing I've struggled with learning Rust is what I will
call, for lack of a better phrase, "shit rustc says". Reading Steve
Klabnik's tutorial and some blog posts about earlier versions of rust, it's
clear that the error messages have improved dramatically since earlier
versions,
Yup, that was pretty much it. (I suspected something like that might be
happening.) Thanks!
To future generations of confused souls: when the impl is parameterized, the
function probably doesn't need to be.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014, Huon Wilson wrote:
On 22/01/14 12:41, Scott Lawrence wrote:
Thi
On 22/01/14 12:41, Scott Lawrence wrote:
This code compiles successfully: http://ix.io/a34 . I believe this
behavior is correct. Just so it's clear what this code does: f() takes
a `&mut int` and adds it to an array - the idea is that all of the
`&mut int` can be changed at some later time. Nat
This code compiles successfully: http://ix.io/a34 . I believe this behavior is
correct. Just so it's clear what this code does: f() takes a `&mut int` and
adds it to an array - the idea is that all of the `&mut int` can be changed at
some later time. Naturally, there's some fancy lifetime juggli
Yes, this is really cleared all mystery, thanks for your explanation Alex!
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Alex Crichton wrote:
> Rust has the idea of "implicit copyability", a property of a type
> formalized by the Pod trait. An implicitly copyable type is either a
> primitive, or a structure
Rust has the idea of "implicit copyability", a property of a type
formalized by the Pod trait. An implicitly copyable type is either a
primitive, or a structure/enum which is built from implicitly copyable
types (plus some extra rules in play here).
When you add a destructor (implementation of the
Hello,
I'm learning rust and trying to understand why rust allows me to compile
this piece of code. When Drop impl is uncommented - rustc complains about
'use of moved value', which is ok i think. My question is - why it compiles
code when Drop is not implemented for Inner struct? If its behaves a
I have added basic let destructuring so that the `lexer.rs` transpiles
completely and it works for the HEAD[1] at the moment (I am working on
last year's copy). Earlier, few statements in `mod test` block were
not supported.
I will now work on accuracy and functionality of the generated code,
so t
Thanks for the feedback.That is indeed a concern. I'm already using
temporary per project credentials with limited policies.
I'll add some text about actually having to generate the docs yourself :)
Hans Jørgen
On 21 January 2014 10:18, Kang Seonghoon wrote:
> Great! I really appreciate a new
Great! I really appreciate a new project listing. Maybe you should
emphasize that you need to run `rustdoc` yourself to get the generated
docs uploaded to the server ;)
I have a question, or rather, a possible security issue with the
artifact uploading though, especially given the following script
14 matches
Mail list logo
