Re: [rust-dev] Rust discourse visibility [Was: Tail call compatibility]

2014-12-29 Thread Dmitry Romanov
I agree on almost every word. I have well sorted and with love configured
mail, where I track several Libre projects. Now it is interesting to track
rust questions. But dropping maillist most probably means I will not
participate any more.

I could add, as example, I have very limited Internet connection on
cristmass trip now so the mail on my mobile is the only reliable way to
track what is happening. Think about this reason too.
On Dec 29, 2014 7:22 PM, Paul Nathan pnat...@alumni.uidaho.edu wrote:

 I have no desire to use Discourse, and nearly certainly won't sign up for
 it (I don't even understand why it came to be). I have never used Rust
 discourse besides happening once upon it and reading the linked thread.

  My membership in mailing lists is neatly sorted and segregated, easily
 readable on my mobile devices without extra signing up or poking at badly
 designed websites. Discourse gives me zero advantage for yet *another*
 website signup, and probably with less usability, given my experience of
 web site development  design.  It's worth noting that every single libre
 software project I have any interest in (from the arcane to the popular)
 maintains the mailing list as the primary official channel of communiques.

 If the Rust admins kill the mailing list, I will probably drop out of
 participation (what a loss. ;) ) and limit participation to lurking
 reddit's /r/rust (I don't contribute thoughtful stuff to reddit in part due
 to the fact that mobile website = awful, readers = ehhh and occasional
 IRC questions.

 I am sure I sound like a crabby crank, but, meh.


 On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Clark Gaebel cg.wowus...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 There was a thread about it on... Discourse!

 http://discuss.rust-lang.org/t/is-it-time-to-kill-the-mailing-list/611/36



 On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Tomi Pieviläinen 
 tomi.pievilai...@iki.fi wrote:

  The mailing list is mostly dead BTW. Consider bringing this up on
  discuss.rust-lang.org instead.

 This is the first time I've heard of that. I checked that it isn't
 even linked on the homepage, but the mailing list and IRC are.

 Have I missed something, or should the discourse then be linked
 instead of or at least in addition of the mailing list?

 --
 Tomi Pieviläinen, +358 400 487 504
 A: Because it disrupts the natural way of thinking.
 Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
 ___
 Rust-dev mailing list
 Rust-dev@mozilla.org
 https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev



 ___
 Rust-dev mailing list
 Rust-dev@mozilla.org
 https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev



 ___
 Rust-dev mailing list
 Rust-dev@mozilla.org
 https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev


___
Rust-dev mailing list
Rust-dev@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev


Re: [rust-dev] self/mut self in traits considered harmful(?)

2014-06-12 Thread Dmitry Romanov
Sorry, Im a little new to Rust, but I'm,as many, now considering moving
from c++ to Rust and the topic is really important for my tasks.

Could you give an Rust example for the concern listed above?

Thank you!
On Jun 12, 2014 9:51 PM, Patrick Walton pcwal...@mozilla.com wrote:

 On 6/12/14 10:46 AM, Tommi wrote:

 `Copy` types aren't really relevant to a discussion about adding to
 Rust the C++ like optimization of moving rvalues (of non-Copy types)
 when they're passed to certain functions.


 There's nothing to add to Rust. Rust supports moves.

 Patrick

 ___
 Rust-dev mailing list
 Rust-dev@mozilla.org
 https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev

___
Rust-dev mailing list
Rust-dev@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev