On 4/29/2013 2:00 PM, Graydon Hoare wrote:
Yes. Formalizing and completing the definition of the constant
expression subgrammar would be extremely valuable. It's one of the
major high-risk areas remaining the the design space. -Graydon
VHDL is a very different language from Rust (it's a
In thinking about how to handle I/O errors, I came up with a system that
needed a do that could take multiple closures (and pass them to
multiple trailing arguments). In thinking about it, this seems
incredibly useful (for non-I/O things), and consistent with how Rust
currently works.
I propose
Comments inline. I'm glad to see integer division getting this level
of attention.
Erik
On 4/25/2013 11:12 AM, Matthieu Monrocq
wrote:
Of course, having an infix syntax would make things
easier: 5 % 3 vs 5 rem 3 vs
On 4/23/2013 9:02 AM, Patrick Walton wrote:
On 4/23/13 7:48 AM, sw...@earthling.net wrote:
Performance should be about the same when using F-division:
* Performance will go up for division by constant powers of two.
* Performance will stay the same for division by compile-time
constants,
Thanks Graydon for the detailed reply to a newbie suggestion. It looks
like I'm a little too late, this ship has already sailed. You're right
that it's a topic reasonable people can disagree on. Adding Lint
warnings seems like a poor workaround, but maybe the reduced confusion
from C developers
