On 23/03/14 06:34 AM, Ziad Hatahet wrote:
Hi all,
Are there any plans to implement structural typing in Rust? Something
like this Scala code: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_typing#In_Scala
Rust used to have structural records. The feature was removed because
it's far from orthogonal with
IMO, this is bad.
2014年3月23日 下午6:34于 Ziad Hatahet hata...@gmail.com写道：
Hi all,
Are there any plans to implement structural typing in Rust? Something like
this Scala code: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_typing#In_Scala
___
Rust-dev mailing
I would note that Rust macros are actually working with structural typing:
the expanded macro cannot be compiled unless the expressions/statements it
results in can be compiled.
Regarding Scala here, it seems a weird idea to ask that each and every
method should copy+paste the interface. We all
You wouldn't probably use this for each and every method, but what it gives
you is Go-style duck typing.
Sure you can define a trait, but what if the struct you to pass to your
function does not implement it? I guess you would have to implement a
wrapper around it manually then.
--
Ziad
On
On 3/23/14 2:19 PM, Ziad Hatahet wrote:
You wouldn't probably use this for each and every method, but what it
gives you is Go-style duck typing.
Sure you can define a trait, but what if the struct you to pass to your
function does not implement it? I guess you would have to implement a
wrapper
+1
2014年3月24日 上午5:46于 Patrick Walton pcwal...@mozilla.com写道：
On 3/23/14 2:19 PM, Ziad Hatahet wrote:
You wouldn't probably use this for each and every method, but what it
gives you is Go-style duck typing.
Sure you can define a trait, but what if the struct you to pass to your
function
Thanks for the feedback everyone. It makes sense how things currently are
for Rust.
Keep up the great work!
--
Ziad
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Liigo Zhuang com.li...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
2014年3月24日 上午5:46于 Patrick Walton pcwal...@mozilla.com写道：
On 3/23/14 2:19 PM, Ziad Hatahet wrote:
