Re: [Ryu-devel] Course on OpenFlow

2013-08-05 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
Hi, On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 16:30:34 -0300 Tonhão - Antonio Brasolin wrote: >Currently, we are planning to present a short tutorial next month > (september) Great! > in a major Brazilian university using RYU as basis, thus we are preparing > slides, documentations as well as examples on it. >

Re: [Ryu-devel] [PATCH 30/36] packet.vrrp: comment

2013-08-05 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 10:44:58 +0900 Isaku Yamahata wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:14:10AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >> > On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 07:29:51 +0900 (JST) >> > [email protected] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote: >> > >> >>> On Fri, 2 Aug 2013 16:36:29 +0900 >> >>> YAMAMOTO Takashi

Re: [Ryu-devel] [PATCH 30/36] packet.vrrp: comment

2013-08-05 Thread Isaku Yamahata
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:14:10AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 07:29:51 +0900 (JST) > > [email protected] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote: > > > >>> On Fri, 2 Aug 2013 16:36:29 +0900 > >>> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > >>> > > Signed-off-by: YAMAMOTO Takashi > >

Re: [Ryu-devel] [PATCH 30/36] packet.vrrp: comment

2013-08-05 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 07:29:51 +0900 (JST) > [email protected] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote: > >>> On Fri, 2 Aug 2013 16:36:29 +0900 >>> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: YAMAMOTO Takashi --- ryu/lib/packet/vrrp.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

Re: [Ryu-devel] What is the recommended way to send flows pro-actively with OF 1.3?

2013-08-05 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 19:17:30 +0800 arne_goetje wrote: > Since you mentioned that DPset is legacy code, what is the recommended way > to send flows pro-actively to the switch? I don't want to listen to > PacketIn events in this case. Sorry, as I wrote, it was too early to say it's legacy. I upda

Re: [Ryu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/3] packet lib to string

2013-08-05 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 13:07:24 +0900 "watanabe.fumitaka" wrote: > Changes v4 -> v5 > - Not adding individual string conversion process >because it was solved by 'ryu.lib.addrconv' patch. > > > Add conversion to string of all member variable of each packet library. > > > --- > ryu/lib/packe

Re: [Ryu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] unit tests for new OFPMatch api

2013-08-05 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 17:01:35 +0900 YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > this set includes: > - unit tests for new OFPMatch api > - fixes bugs found by the test > > YAMAMOTO Takashi (3): > ofproto_v1_2_parser: stop assuming OFPXMC_OPENFLOW_BASIC > of13: fix old parser and serializer of PBB_ID > unit t

Re: [Ryu-devel] AttributeError in DPSet with OpenFlow 1.3

2013-08-05 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:13:02 +0900 Satoshi Kobayashi wrote: > I tried the patch. I checked that the exception was not raised. Thanks! I've applied the patch. > P.S. There is a method which reformed it now because DPSet is regacy? I've been trying to make ryu/topology a new DPSet. However, it's

[Ryu-devel] Course on OpenFlow

2013-08-05 Thread Tonhão - Antonio Brasolin
Dear Ryu users and developers, We are a group of grad students from Brazil, working on SDN and experimental testbeds. Currently, we are planning to present a short tutorial next month (september) in a major Brazilian university using RYU as basis, thus we are preparing slides, documentation

Re: [Ryu-devel] [PATCH 30/36] packet.vrrp: comment

2013-08-05 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 07:29:51 +0900 (JST) [email protected] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote: >> On Fri, 2 Aug 2013 16:36:29 +0900 >> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: YAMAMOTO Takashi >>> --- >>> ryu/lib/packet/vrrp.py | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>

Re: [Ryu-devel] Ryu GUI

2013-08-05 Thread Tonhão - Antonio Brasolin
Sorry, the 2) should be sudo PYTHONPATH=. ./ryu/gui/controller.py On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Tonhão - Antonio Brasolin < [email protected]> wrote: > 1) > If the correct packets are installed, go the git directory and execute ryu > to capture the packets and prepare the webservice: > > PY

[Ryu-devel] What is the recommended way to send flows pro-actively with OF 1.3?

2013-08-05 Thread arne_goetje
Dear list, as subject. Since you mentioned that DPset is legacy code, what is the recommended way to send flows pro-actively to the switch? I don't want to listen to PacketIn events in this case. Thanks. Cheers Arne

[Ryu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] unit tests for the new OFPMatch api

2013-08-05 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
Signed-off-by: YAMAMOTO Takashi --- ryu/tests/unit/ofproto/test_parser_ofpmatch.py | 241 + 1 file changed, 241 insertions(+) create mode 100644 ryu/tests/unit/ofproto/test_parser_ofpmatch.py diff --git a/ryu/tests/unit/ofproto/test_parser_ofpmatch.py b/ryu/tests/unit/

[Ryu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] of13: fix old parser and serializer of PBB_ID

2013-08-05 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
Signed-off-by: YAMAMOTO Takashi --- ryu/ofproto/ofproto_v1_3_parser.py | 22 ++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) diff --git a/ryu/ofproto/ofproto_v1_3_parser.py b/ryu/ofproto/ofproto_v1_3_parser.py index b2189dd..71ad328 100644 --- a/ryu/ofproto/ofproto_v1_3_parser.py +++ b

[Ryu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] unit tests for new OFPMatch api

2013-08-05 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
this set includes: - unit tests for new OFPMatch api - fixes bugs found by the test YAMAMOTO Takashi (3): ofproto_v1_2_parser: stop assuming OFPXMC_OPENFLOW_BASIC of13: fix old parser and serializer of PBB_ID unit tests for the new OFPMatch api ryu/ofproto/ofproto_v1_2_parser.py

[Ryu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] ofproto_v1_2_parser: stop assuming OFPXMC_OPENFLOW_BASIC

2013-08-05 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
fix a merge botch and sync with of1.3 version. Signed-off-by: YAMAMOTO Takashi --- ryu/ofproto/ofproto_v1_2_parser.py | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ryu/ofproto/ofproto_v1_2_parser.py b/ryu/ofproto/ofproto_v1_2_parser.py index b4a306b..a9bd0b1 100644 ---