[Ryu-devel] [PATCH] snortlib: Fix nw_sock handling

2015-02-18 Thread Yusuke Iwase
Currently, snortlib cannot receive reconnect request from Snort client program (e.g. pigrelay.py). This patch fixes this problem. Signed-off-by: IWASE Yusuke --- ryu/lib/snortlib.py | 32 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/ryu/lib/snor

Re: [Ryu-devel] Bug in dhcp.hlen calculation

2015-02-18 Thread Minoru TAKAHASHI
Hi, On 2015年02月17日 19:36, Sam Russell wrote: > I've been working with ryu.lib.packet.dhcp and I believe hlen is being > calculated incorrectly. I think so too. > > If I create a dhcp() object without passing hlen, it attempts to set > this to len(chaddr) - but this gets the length of the string

Re: [Ryu-devel] Using Meter Tables

2015-02-18 Thread Shu Shen
The error message (type=12, code=10) means No more meters available (OFPMMFC_OUT_OF_METERS). Meters are not yet supported by OVS: https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/TODO.md#meters The maximum number of meters is set to zero in OVS so that OFPMMFC_OUT_OF_METERS is always returned to OF

[Ryu-devel] Using Meter Tables

2015-02-18 Thread Mehrdad Moradi
Hello, I am trying to use meters (rate-limiters) by adding them to flow entries. I am using the latest RYU and Mininet. However, it seems when the flow mods are installed into the tables, I get some errors similar to the following. Thus my question is if this is OVS limitation or this is specific

Re: [Ryu-devel] Problem with the example of the documentation http://ryu.readthedocs.org/en/latest/app/ofctl_rest.html#example-of-vlan-id-match-field

2015-02-18 Thread Clément Rault
Hi, Thanks for your answer. I have the version 3.13 installed so that's why it's not working. Best, Clément On 18 February 2015 at 08:39, Yusuke Iwase wrote: > Hi Clément > > On 2015年02月18日 01:19, Clément Rault wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I get the following error when I try the example (To match

Re: [Ryu-devel] Processing pipeline: use multiple group entries on a single packet?

2015-02-18 Thread Clément Rault
Hi, Thanks for your answer. Thanks for this information, I guess this explains why my example is not working. What I'm wondering now is if this is not working as group entries actions are processed almost right at the end and it's not possible to go back to flow tables after that. Therefore it's