Even this one is not working ! Any suggestions?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 28, 2015, at 5:34 PM, Yusuke Iwase wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On 2015年08月28日 16:21, Talal Alharbi wrote:
>> No Worries. I have fixed it but I have a new problem.
>>
>> I managed to set actions to rewrite the payload and se
Hi Ryu folks,
I'm attempting to write a controller application which needs to
extract the DHCP header from a packet-in using the dhcp parser in Ryu.
I believe I have found a bug in the parser and have provided a possible fix
below. In addition, I believe there may be a second bug. I
> On Aug 27, 2015, at 10:44 PM, Yusuke Iwase wrote:
>
> If OVS work so, I think it is a bug of OVS and tester.py should not wait OVS.
I believe you are right. In the process of investigating this I captured all
the OpenFlow packets between Ryu and the switches and looked at them with
Wiresh
This revised variant of the above patch uses the stricter trunc()-function
instead of int() for the conversion.
Greetings,
-Fadi
2015-08-28 12:55 GMT+02:00 Fadi Moukayed :
> Signed-off-by: Fadi Moukayed
> ---
> ryu/lib/packet/igmp.py | 7 ---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(
Signed-off-by: Fadi Moukayed
---
ryu/lib/packet/igmp.py | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ryu/lib/packet/igmp.py b/ryu/lib/packet/igmp.py
index f1d65b0..cd8f59c 100644
--- a/ryu/lib/packet/igmp.py
+++ b/ryu/lib/packet/igmp.py
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ where each
I did without luck.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 28, 2015, at 5:34 PM, Yusuke Iwase wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On 2015年08月28日 16:21, Talal Alharbi wrote:
>> No Worries. I have fixed it but I have a new problem.
>>
>> I managed to set actions to rewrite the payload and send out from the port
>> whe
Hi,
On 2015年08月27日 18:02, FIXED-TERM Vardhan Harsha (CR/AEH4) wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I’m trying to perform link discovery in my multipath topology using the ryu
> built-in topology module.
>
> But when I use this there is lldp multicast storm and also not all the links
> are discovered
Hi,
On 2015年08月28日 16:21, Talal Alharbi wrote:
> No Worries. I have fixed it but I have a new problem.
>
> I managed to set actions to rewrite the payload and send out from the port
> where the packet is being received(ingress port) but did not work if I'm
> sending and the packet from the same
No Worries. I have fixed it but I have a new problem.
I managed to set actions to rewrite the payload and send out from the port
where the packet is being received(ingress port) but did not work if I'm
sending and the packet from the same port where I received from, and if I use
other port, th
