Hi,
I'm not sure if i can, the thing is I am using mininet + ryu + snort on
diferents virtual machines.
When I'm done with this tests I might look to use OVS, but i remember
having some problem with it..
Thanks anyway!
Em sex, 19 de fev de 2016 às 00:41, Yusuke Iwase
escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> If it
Hi,
If it is the restriction of Linux kernel, how about using OVS instead?
With OVS, you can add the port mirroring more flexibly, I think.
Thanks,
Iwase
On 2016年02月19日 07:14, Henrique Santos Fernandes wrote:
> Just an update.
>
> I guess it was an update in kernel. ( although i could not fin
Hi Fujita-San,
On 2016年02月18日 13:37, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 15:39:50 +0900
> IWASE Yusuke wrote:
>
>> simple_switch_* apps have conflicting two faces of its purpose.
>> One is the example apps for beginners, the other is the utility
>> apps for the L2 switching in the user
Hi,
Please don't drop the mailing list.
> There is an error in my code. It works fine. Thanks.
OK, I'm glad to hear that.
thanks,
On 2016年02月19日 10:50, yu hsiang Huang wrote:
> Hi Minoru,
>
> There is an error in my code. It works fine. Thanks.
>
> *
> *
> */Best Regards,/*
> */
> /*
> *
After more discussion with Iwamoto-San, cut things down to 2 semaphores.
In doing so, it was discovered that PriorityQueues *don't* maintain FIFO
ordering by default.
In order to achieve FIFO ordering, a counter has to be used, per:
https://docs.python.org/2/library/heapq.html#priority-queue-impl
Just an update.
I guess it was an update in kernel. ( although i could not find the commit.
)
I am now using my lts kernel from archlinux and the command runned fine
Thanks
Em qui, 18 de fev de 2016 às 17:47, Henrique Santos Fernandes <
[email protected]> escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> There is anyot
On Feb 18, 2016, at 2:27 PM, Victor Orlikowski wrote:
>
> That having been said - if we're not getting events of the same priority in
> FIFO order due to the PriorityQueue - that's may not be a good thing. I will
> consider it further.
Trying again - seems Python's heapq documentation has cons
Hello,
There is anyother alternatve to this?
I mean, now for somereason I get an error while trying to do this:
# brctl setageing rede_snort1 0
set ageing time failed: Numerical result out of range
It only works when the number is 10 or above.
I looked for new code to see if there is any change
On Feb 18, 2016, at 1:46 PM, Victor J. Orlikowski wrote:
>
> 1) Cut the number of semaphores to 2 (PacketIns and "everything else").
This isn't going to work.
I tried moving to a single priority queue and 2 semaphores (PacketIns, and
"everything else") in our lab environment.
I *immediately*
On Feb 17, 2016, at 11:16 PM, IWAMOTO Toshihiro wrote:
> I think the code is mostly okay now.
>
Well - that's a start. ;)
>> +self.events = hub.PriorityQueue(96)
>> +self._event_get_timeout = 5
>> +# The sum of the following semaphores must equal the number of
>> +
Dear Sir/Madam,
Is anyone have any idea about If I want to use Ryu to match transmit
"files" in openvswitch when host are sent out, how can I do?
And after this "match", I want to do some "action" like add another flow
entries (rule) in switch.
P.S. More detail about this question is I don't kno
Hi,
> buf += struct.pack(fmt, *args)
>
> error: ubyte format requires 0 <= number <= 255
I think you don't need upgrade the python version.
Because above error appears when you input invalid arg to struct.pack.
Example is as follows.
$ python
Python 2.7.6 (default, Mar 22 2014, 22:59:56)
[
12 matches
Mail list logo
