Minor change: since I am not using PriorityQueue anymore, it does not need to
be present in hub.py.
Signed-off-by: Victor J. Orlikowski
diff --git a/ryu/base/app_manager.py b/ryu/base/app_manager.py
index 3d5d895..ed60857 100644
--- a/ryu/base/app_manager.py
+++ b/ryu/base/app_manager.py
@@ -15
I have not yet.
I had planned to submit a patch upstream, but wanted to get this resolved
first, especially since the eventlet community does not seem terribly
responsive.
I will be *glad* to remove the semaphores, once eventlet has been fixed
upstream (possibly by me).
Until then, the semapho
Hi,
At Tue, 23 Feb 2016 14:10:52 +,
Victor Orlikowski wrote:
>
> I have re-read the source for Eventlet's get() on a queue.
> I am willing to give the code a try in the lab without the timeouts.
> I will report back my results - but I believe that the timeout code in get()
> is not significa
After extensive testing in the lab, I have established that the timeouts used
for queue get() operations are not strictly necessary. Therefore, I am removing
them, per Iwamoto-san's request.
The semaphore protecting put(), however, *is* required.
I have also reverted back to a simple queue, fro
Hi
For getting datapath object from datapath.id (which is an integer) I have
added this code bellow
from ryu.app.ofctl.api import get_datapath
dp = get_datapath(self, datapath.id)
but I am getting this message "unknown error xid"
How can I fix it?
BR
Titu
-
I have re-read the source for Eventlet's get() on a queue.
I am willing to give the code a try in the lab without the timeouts.
I will report back my results - but I believe that the timeout code in get() is
not significantly different from the code used to schedule an unlock of a
blocked getter
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 01:46:25PM +0900, Minoru TAKAHASHI wrote:
> Hi Xandaros,
>
> On 2016年02月22日 23:47, Xandaros wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Say I have the following three files:
> > /a/a.py
> > /a/b.py
> > /b/b.py
> >
> > And I start ryu like this:
> > ryu /a/a.py /b/b.py
> >
> > It w
