Hi Albert,
Thank you for posting your patch again!
May I have some comments on this patch?
> diff -uprN ryu_git/ryu/services/protocols/bgp/peer.py
> ryu_allowasin/ryu/services/protocols/bgp/peer.py
> --- ryu_git/ryu/services/protocols/bgp/peer.py2017-01-16
> 18:05:25.376542037 +0100
>
Hi All,
I meet a problem.
When the packet-in message is sent to the controller ,I add a flow entry to
switch.
After that,the same packages sent to the switch should match the flow
entry.But they can't match the flow entry and the same packet-in messages
are
sent to the controller.
What caused
Hi Ryu team,
Do you have any schedule to add this feature to Ryu BGP?
Thank you,
Trung
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Hello,
See attached patch to support updates with local ASN in the path.
The use case for this patch is auto RD/RT and simplified leaf/spine
architectures, see below.
Cisco/Juniper/Cumulus and undoubtedly more vendors offer a
simplification/generalization of the EVPN configuration by not ha
Hey Iwase,
> Hi Albert,
> Would you mind keeping mailing list?
> I think it is very helpful for us to share your great perspective!
No problem, I thought to avoid cluttering up the list, but you're right.
After I sent the message I searched some more and oops, I think I
might have answered by
Hi Albert,
Would you mind keeping mailing list?
I think it is very helpful for us to share your great perspective!
On 2017年01月31日 23:35, Albert Siersema wrote:
> Hello Iwase,
>
> Thanks for all the work in getting the interoperability changes upstream.
>
> I wonder if you could help me out in
