Re: [Ryu-devel] Proposal: High layer RPC API

2014-04-06 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
> 2014-02-19 21:20 GMT+09:00 FUJITA Tomonori : > >> On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:29:53 +0900 >> Satoshi Kobayashi wrote: >> >> > If it is only using WebSocket, I think that Gevent is good. Is using >> Gevent >> > and Eventlet together safe? >> >> Jeremias pointed out to me that websocket might support

Re: [Ryu-devel] Proposal: High layer RPC API

2014-02-19 Thread Satoshi Kobayashi
2014-02-19 21:20 GMT+09:00 FUJITA Tomonori : > On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:29:53 +0900 > Satoshi Kobayashi wrote: > > > If it is only using WebSocket, I think that Gevent is good. Is using > Gevent > > and Eventlet together safe? > > Jeremias pointed out to me that websocket might support eventlet. >

Re: [Ryu-devel] Proposal: High layer RPC API

2014-02-19 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:29:53 +0900 Satoshi Kobayashi wrote: > If it is only using WebSocket, I think that Gevent is good. Is using Gevent > and Eventlet together safe? Jeremias pointed out to me that websocket might support eventlet. http://eventlet.net/doc/modules/websocket.html Enough inform

Re: [Ryu-devel] Proposal: High layer RPC API

2014-02-17 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:54:07 +0900 Satoshi Kobayashi wrote: > 2014-02-13 8:23 GMT+09:00 FUJITA Tomonori : > >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:52:36 +0900 >> Satoshi Kobayashi wrote: >> >> > If Raw TCP is changed to WebSocket only, It do not have many merits. But >> > when messaging is also ch

Re: [Ryu-devel] Proposal: High layer RPC API

2014-02-17 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:40:47 +0900 (JST) [email protected] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote: >> If it is only using WebSocket, I think that Gevent is good. Is using Gevent >> and Eventlet together safe? > > unfortunately, no. How about ws4py? https://ws4py.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ Looks like no

Re: [Ryu-devel] Proposal: High layer RPC API

2014-02-17 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
> Hi, > > If it is only using WebSocket, I think that Gevent is good. Is using Gevent > and Eventlet together safe? unfortunately, no. YAMAMOTO Takashi > > 2014-02-14 22:40 GMT+09:00 Jeremias Blendin < > [email protected]>: > >> Hi, >> >> I have used gevent websocket, whi

Re: [Ryu-devel] Proposal: High layer RPC API

2014-02-17 Thread Satoshi Kobayashi
Hi, If it is only using WebSocket, I think that Gevent is good. Is using Gevent and Eventlet together safe? 2014-02-14 22:40 GMT+09:00 Jeremias Blendin < [email protected]>: > Hi, > > I have used gevent websocket, which integrated well with pywsgi, which is > (or was?) used

Re: [Ryu-devel] Proposal: High layer RPC API

2014-02-14 Thread Jeremias Blendin
Hi, I have used gevent websocket, which integrated well with pywsgi, which is (or was?) used for the RASP API of Ryu. https://pypi.python.org/pypi/gevent-websocket/ 2014-02-13 3:54 GMT+01:00 Satoshi Kobayashi : > 2014-02-13 8:23 GMT+09:00 FUJITA Tomonori : > > Hi, >> >> On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:

Re: [Ryu-devel] Proposal: High layer RPC API

2014-02-12 Thread Satoshi Kobayashi
2014-02-13 8:23 GMT+09:00 FUJITA Tomonori : > Hi, > > On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:52:36 +0900 > Satoshi Kobayashi wrote: > > > If Raw TCP is changed to WebSocket only, It do not have many merits. But > > when messaging is also changed to non-binary (JSON?), it seems to be easy > > to use. Many develop

Re: [Ryu-devel] Proposal: High layer RPC API

2014-02-12 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
Hi, On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:52:36 +0900 Satoshi Kobayashi wrote: > If Raw TCP is changed to WebSocket only, It do not have many merits. But > when messaging is also changed to non-binary (JSON?), it seems to be easy > to use. Many development tools exist. As I wrote in another mail, I talked abo

Re: [Ryu-devel] Proposal: High layer RPC API

2014-02-12 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:22:09 +0900 (JST) [email protected] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote: >> On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:28:50 +0900 >> Satoshi Kobayashi wrote: >> >>> I tried RPC API on Ryu3.6. The sample of VRRP was very helpful for me. >>> Thanks a lot! And I would like to feedback the noticed poi

Re: [Ryu-devel] Proposal: High layer RPC API

2014-02-11 Thread Satoshi Kobayashi
2014-02-12 12:22 GMT+09:00 YAMAMOTO Takashi : > > On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:28:50 +0900 > > Satoshi Kobayashi wrote: > > > >> I tried RPC API on Ryu3.6. The sample of VRRP was very helpful for me. > >> Thanks a lot! And I would like to feedback the noticed point. > >> > >> Feedback: > >> I think tha

Re: [Ryu-devel] Proposal: High layer RPC API

2014-02-11 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:28:50 +0900 > Satoshi Kobayashi wrote: > >> I tried RPC API on Ryu3.6. The sample of VRRP was very helpful for me. >> Thanks a lot! And I would like to feedback the noticed point. >> >> Feedback: >> I think that the layer of API is low for users. It is hard that a user >

Re: [Ryu-devel] Proposal: High layer RPC API

2014-02-11 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:28:50 +0900 Satoshi Kobayashi wrote: > I tried RPC API on Ryu3.6. The sample of VRRP was very helpful for me. > Thanks a lot! And I would like to feedback the noticed point. > > Feedback: > I think that the layer of API is low for users. It is hard that a user > writes the

[Ryu-devel] Proposal: High layer RPC API

2014-02-11 Thread Satoshi Kobayashi
Hi all, I tried RPC API on Ryu3.6. The sample of VRRP was very helpful for me. Thanks a lot! And I would like to feedback the noticed point. Feedback: I think that the layer of API is low for users. It is hard that a user writes the same thing as rpc_manager.RpcVRRPManager. Proposal: I would lik