On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:24:43 +0900
"watanabe.fumitaka" wrote:
> Hi, yamamoto.
>
> Is correction below correct with the new API?
> If satisfactory now, I will try test.
>
>
> --- a/ryu/app/rest_router.py
> +++ b/ryu/app/rest_router.py
> @@ -1764,13 +1764,9 @@ class OfCtl_v1_2(OfCtl):
>
I tried the following patche.
It checked working correctly also OpenFlow1.0 switch.
Thank you.
>It was regarded as the list because of the unnecessary comma.
>
>
>Signed-off-by: WATANABE Fumitaka
>---
> ryu/app/rest_router.py |4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
I also checked the patch working correctly.
However, it seems that another bug still remains in the case of openflow1.0.
I will correct it later as another patch.
File "/home/ryu/OFC/src/router/rest_router.py", line 1575, in
set_packetin_flow
nw_proto=nw_proto, actions=actions)
File
I tried the following patches.
It checked working correctly.
Thank you.
(2013/10/29 (火) 11:34), YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>> Hi, yamamoto.
>>
>> Is correction below correct with the new API?
>
> yes.
>
> YAMAMOTO Takashi
>
>> If satisfactory now, I will try test.
>>
>>
>> --- a/ryu/app/rest_router.
> Hi, yamamoto.
>
> Is correction below correct with the new API?
yes.
YAMAMOTO Takashi
> If satisfactory now, I will try test.
>
>
> --- a/ryu/app/rest_router.py
> +++ b/ryu/app/rest_router.py
> @@ -1764,13 +1764,9 @@ class OfCtl_v1_2(OfCtl):
> if dec_ttl:
> actions.a
Hi, yamamoto.
Is correction below correct with the new API?
If satisfactory now, I will try test.
--- a/ryu/app/rest_router.py
+++ b/ryu/app/rest_router.py
@@ -1764,13 +1764,9 @@ class OfCtl_v1_2(OfCtl):
if dec_ttl:
actions.append(ofp_parser.OFPActionDecNwTtl())
>> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:04:30 +0900 (JST)
>> [email protected] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
>>
>>> - for OF1.2 and 1.3, the recommended way is to compose set-field actions
>>> is "OFPActionSetField(eth_src='11:22:33:44:55:66')".
>>>
>>> - OFPMatchField.make is an internal api and it should
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:04:30 +0900 (JST)
> [email protected] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
>
>> - for OF1.2 and 1.3, the recommended way is to compose set-field actions
>> is "OFPActionSetField(eth_src='11:22:33:44:55:66')".
>>
>> - OFPMatchField.make is an internal api and it should not hav
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:04:30 +0900 (JST)
[email protected] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> - for OF1.2 and 1.3, the recommended way is to compose set-field actions
> is "OFPActionSetField(eth_src='11:22:33:44:55:66')".
>
> - OFPMatchField.make is an internal api and it should not have been
>
- for OF1.2 and 1.3, the recommended way is to compose set-field actions
is "OFPActionSetField(eth_src='11:22:33:44:55:66')".
- OFPMatchField.make is an internal api and it should not have been
used by apps in the first place. it was kept only for compat reasons.
- OFPMatchField.make takes b
CC'ed the author
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:14:49 +0900
wataru yamamoto wrote:
> I tried to execute rest_router.py.
>
> However, the MAC Address of the packet which acts as a forward is inaccurate.
> Specifically, the MAC Address is ASCII-Code instead of Binary-Code.
>
> Then, I corrected as follo
I tried to execute rest_router.py.
However, the MAC Address of the packet which acts as a forward is inaccurate.
Specifically, the MAC Address is ASCII-Code instead of Binary-Code.
Then, I corrected as follows.
=== start ===
--- rest_router.py.org 2013-10-28 14:51:15.0 +0900
+++ rest_r
12 matches
Mail list logo
