Hi Iwase,
First of all thank you for your information and the patch. I have tried to
implement it and the code is initializing well The problem is when they
want to start to communicate with the other addr, I get this error: error:
[Errno 111] ECONNREFUSED
More detailed information about the erro
Hello,
I would like to know how can I get information regarding the openflow
table capacity such as maximum entries, no. of entries installed etc.
The max_entries field mentioned here (
https://ryu.readthedocs.io/en/latest/app/ofctl_rest.html#get-table-stats)
is for one particular table in the s
Hi,
Please refer to "n_tables" field in OFPSwitchFeatures message.
https://ryu.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ofproto_v1_3_ref.html#ryu.ofproto.ofproto_v1_3_parser.OFPSwitchFeatures
Thanks,
Iwase
On 2017年02月14日 21:56, Moh'd Reza Abbasi wrote:
> Hello,
> I would like to know how can I get informat
Signed-off-by: IWASE Yusuke
---
ryu/services/protocols/bgp/rtconf/base.py | 20 ++--
ryu/services/protocols/bgp/rtconf/common.py| 2 +-
ryu/services/protocols/bgp/rtconf/neighbors.py | 8
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ryu/serv
The v2 patch updates v1 to improves the Python 3 compatibility and
handle the case that the peer sent the empty AS_PATH for iBGP peering.
v1: Currently, Ryu supports the features of Route Server.
On the other hand, does not have the features of Route Reflector.
The following patches implement the
Signed-off-by: IWASE Yusuke
---
ryu/services/protocols/bgp/utils/bgp.py | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ryu/services/protocols/bgp/utils/bgp.py
b/ryu/services/protocols/bgp/utils/bgp.py
index 4979e44..4bdedf0 100644
--- a/ryu/services/protocols/bgp/utils/
This patch implements the features for acting as a Route Reflector
which defined in RFC4456.
Signed-off-by: IWASE Yusuke
---
ryu/lib/packet/bgp.py | 2 +-
ryu/services/protocols/bgp/application.py | 2 +
ryu/services/protocols/bgp/bgpspeaker.py | 28 -
Hi Jordi,
Thank you for testing my patch!
On 2017年02月14日 21:03, Jordi Bisbal wrote:
> Hi Iwase,
>
> First of all thank you for your information and the patch. I have tried to
> implement it and the code is initializing well The problem is when they want
> to start to communicate with the othe