Re: [S-nail] Possible bug in s-nail on timestamp of Dec 31

2016-09-15 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Donald, > How do you post correctly. Explain top posting so I can avoid doing > it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style should explain. In brief, it's common to keep just the pertinent bits of the email you're replying to, "quote" those, I use "> " as do many others, and then

[S-nail] S-nail v14.9.0-pre1 preview on [master] (backward incompatible!)

2016-09-15 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Hello list! After about ten months of development i have merged into [master] the current state of affairs. It introduces some **backward incompatibilities**! Packagers should be able to find a unified diff file for their respective package management attached to this message. This is a

Re: [S-nail] Possible bug in s-nail on timestamp of Dec 31

2016-09-15 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Ralph Corderoy wrote: |BTW, I suspect the "Dec 31" are in 1969 and the time was zero seconds |past the Unix epoch, viewed offset by a negative timezone. Ah, i see! ?0[steffen@wales nail.git]$ >> MTA: /usr/sbin/sendmail, arguments: sendmail -i -- h@a s-nail: >>>

Re: [S-nail] Possible bug in s-nail on timestamp of Dec 31

2016-09-15 Thread Donald Mugnai
How do you post correctly. Explain top posting so I can avoid doing it. Donald Mugnai 1 Watermill Place Unit 124 Arlington MA 02476 donaldmug...@gmail.com On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > Hey. > > Please don't top-post on this list, it is really

Re: [S-nail] Possible bug in s-nail on timestamp of Dec 31

2016-09-15 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Donald, BTW, I suspect the "Dec 31" are in 1969 and the time was zero seconds past the Unix epoch, viewed offset by a negative timezone. -- Cheers, Ralph. https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy --

Re: [S-nail] Possible bug in s-nail on timestamp of Dec 31

2016-09-15 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Donald, > > How do you "configure the way the headline is displayed with the > > variable of the same name[1]" In the s-nail.rc file? All I want to > > get is a correct timestamp for my messages instead of Dec 31. Does this help? $ mail mail version v14.8.10. Type ? for help.

Re: [S-nail] Possible bug in s-nail on timestamp of Dec 31

2016-09-15 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Hey. Please don't top-post on this list, it is really something ugly to do, imho. That would be nice. If you really want to include the entire message you respond to, you could set the internal S-nail variable *quote-as-attachment*, for example. ^.^ Donald Mugnai