Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive
Dear list, Rachel has answered one more time, but please let me post the essence not the 1000 lines and 57 KB, i think that helps everyone: Rachel (NeverBounce) Mar 29, 9:38 AM EDT Thank you again for the response. We completely understand where you are coming from. Should we gather any additional information in the future that would be of any assistance to you, we would be happy to share. We appreciate your understanding and patience as we work to provide the best in email verification. Enjoy your day. All the best, Rachel I concur and join in and wishing everyone a nice weekend. Good night and Ciao! --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)
Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive
Hello Ralph. Ralph Corderoy wrote in <20190329131453.6f21022...@orac.inputplus.co.uk>: |> I guess to satisfy this service i have to reinstantiate the MX record |> that has been there before Russell Bell started sending to the |> resolved CNAME instead of the CNAME itself. | |But you don't have to satisfy this broken service that knowingly and |wilfully violates RFCs and yet, it seems, does not lobby the IETF for a |new RFC to amend the widely followed policy. | |To bow to their diktat lessens the value of all RFCs. The mailing list |works fine for those of us following the RFC. Well yes, but i am a coward. I have reinstalled it. I mean, the RFC says you need to look for MX so let's just satisfy this request and everything is op, but for Russell who does not like CNAME but does not want O_NOFOLLOW. So what, the world is not perfect, that cannot be helped. Be liberal in what you expect but strict in what you produce never bounces. Ciao, --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)
Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive
Hi Viktor. SZÉPE Viktor wrote in <20190329022932.Horde.ujzATf_unnnWcG4cIg5e5Bs@sze\ pe.net>: |Idézem/Quoting SZÉPE Viktor : |> Idézem/Quoting Steffen Nurpmeso : ... |>> It is a real shame that this tracker calls itself Zendesk and then |>> requires top-posting. Being boring as i am, we still cite people ... |> No humans I know do bottom posting, |> I do not dare bottom post for them as they may not find an answer!! |> |> Only bit-based guys like us from the '90s (living on the terminal) |> do top posting. | |I am sorry, this "top posting" was a glitch in my head, of course I've |meant bottom posting. | |SZÉPE Viktor, webes alkalmazás üzemeltetés / Running your application I really like how translate.google.com says "alkalmazás üzemeltetés". (If it is that woman who can be heard everywhere.) --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)
Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive
Hi Steffen, > I guess to satisfy this service i have to reinstantiate the MX record > that has been there before Russell Bell started sending to the > resolved CNAME instead of the CNAME itself. But you don't have to satisfy this broken service that knowingly and wilfully violates RFCs and yet, it seems, does not lobby the IETF for a new RFC to amend the widely followed policy. To bow to their diktat lessens the value of all RFCs. The mailing list works fine for those of us following the RFC. -- Cheers, Ralph.
