Re: [s3ql] Test errors s3ql-2.8.1 on Centos 6.5 64bit

2014-04-14 Thread Cristian Manoni
> > Could you check if any other tests fail as well? If you remove the > --exitfirst argument in tests/pytest.ini, py.test will continue with the > remaining tests even when encountering a failure. > > Test failed are:

[s3ql] AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'discard' when connecting to Swift

2014-04-14 Thread Marcin Skarbek
Hi, I get exception when I'm trying to connect to swift backend. My provider uses '/auth/v1.0' so swift backend fails in first iteration of for loop in _get_conn but instead of second try with '/auth/v1.0' I get this: Uncaught top-level exception: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home

[s3ql] Re: Packaging S3QL 2.8.1 in Fedora

2014-04-14 Thread Marcin Skarbek
S3ql 2.x needs Python 3 so you should use python3-devel python3-setuptools python3-crypto python3-apsw and python3-llfuse packages. On Tuesday, April 8, 2014 8:16:36 PM UTC+2, Diogo Vieira wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm trying to package s3ql in Fedora since the version in the repositories > is still

Re: [s3ql] dugong.UnsupportedResponse: No content-length and no chunked encoding

2014-04-14 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On 04/14/2014 10:07 AM, Adam Watkins wrote: > > > This comes from the server discussed in my first email, and is running > S3QL 2.8.1: [...] Could you apply the attached patches the python-dugong and S3QL, and then try to reproduce the problem? To apply the patches, do a 'patch -p1 < patchname.

Re: [s3ql] dugong.UnsupportedResponse: No content-length and no chunked encoding

2014-04-14 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On 04/14/2014 10:07 AM, Adam Watkins wrote: > > > This comes from the server discussed in my first email, and is running > S3QL 2.8.1: Alright, I'll probably have to send you some extra code to get more debugging information. Could you please also file this as a (second, new) bug on https://bi

Re: [s3ql] dugong.UnsupportedResponse: No content-length and no chunked encoding

2014-04-14 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On 04/14/2014 10:06 AM, Adam Watkins wrote: > This comes from another server running Debian 7.4 and using the S3QL > 1.11 package: > This server _isn't_ running on my home network, and I've no reason to > believe that it's connection is particularly unreliable. > [] Thanks! Could you please f

Re: [s3ql] Test errors s3ql-2.8.1 on Centos 6.5 64bit

2014-04-14 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On 04/13/2014 11:51 PM, Cristian Manoni wrote: > > > Hmm. Does it by any chance help if you apply the following patch? > > diff --git a/tests/t2_block_cache.py b/tests/t2_block_cache.py > --- a/tests/t2_block_cache.py > +++ b/tests/t2_block_cache.py > @@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ >

Re: [s3ql] AES key stored inside the data?

2014-04-14 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On 04/14/2014 08:17 AM, Adrin wrote: > > > On Monday, 14 April 2014 03:11:04 UTC+2, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > On 04/13/2014 01:46 PM, Adrin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm not sure if I understand it correctly, but is it true that you are > > storing the AES key along with the dat

Re: [s3ql] dugong.UnsupportedResponse: No content-length and no chunked encoding

2014-04-14 Thread Adam Watkins
This comes from the server discussed in my first email, and is running S3QL 2.8.1: 2014-04-13 03:49:09.689 [pid=27186, thread='Thread-3', module='root', fn='excepthook', line=157]: Uncaught top-level exception: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/lib/python3.4/si

Re: [s3ql] dugong.UnsupportedResponse: No content-length and no chunked encoding

2014-04-14 Thread Adam Watkins
This comes from another server running Debian 7.4 and using the S3QL 1.11 package: This server _isn't_ running on my home network, and I've no reason to believe that it's connection is particularly unreliable. 2014-04-14 16:38:31.830 [11382] MainThread: [mount] Encountered exception, trying

Re: [s3ql] AES key stored inside the data?

2014-04-14 Thread Adrin
> > > > On Monday, 14 April 2014 03:11:04 UTC+2, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > On 04/13/2014 01:46 PM, Adrin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm not sure if I understand it correctly, but is it true that you are > > storing the AES key along with the data? > > Yes. > > > Then what's the point of encrypting the da