[s3ql] Re: Unexpected server reply to copy operation (upgrading from 20 to 21)

2014-09-09 Thread Adam Watkins
Regarding my original issue with StorageQloud, GreenQloud have now responded after 25 days with the following: Part of our object storage solution involves third party software, so we will have to ask them to fix the namespace declaration. Unfortunately this will not going to happen soon.

Re: [s3ql] Re: Unexpected server reply to copy operation (upgrading from 20 to 21)

2014-09-09 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On 09/09/2014 12:20 PM, Adam Watkins wrote: Regarding my original issue with StorageQloud, GreenQloud have now responded after 25 days with the following: Part of our object storage solution involves third party software, so we will have to ask them to fix the namespace