Hello,
I made an error while correcting the series file (relative to the
patch that appeared at the end of the file). My first attempt was to
correct it but while starting Sage I get
RuntimeError: Unable to start MuPAD because the command 'mupkern -P e
-U SAGE=TRUE' failed.
In order to use the
Hello,
I made an error while correcting the series file (relative to the
patch that appeared at the end of the file). My first attempt was to
correct it but while starting Sage I get
I decided to disabling mupad-interface which seems to resolve the problem.
--
You received this message
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:05:00PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
During the last few weeks I've spent time optimizing code, among
other things.
Great!
A surprising number of random things I look at in Sage are too slow
by a factor of 10-100, usually due to programming style. One way to
help
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:05:00PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
During the last few weeks I've spent time optimizing code, among
other things.
Great!
A surprising number of random things I look at in Sage are
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:53 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Ironically, extension types are far less affected, if at all:
Without:
sage: timeit('ZZ._list',number=10^6)
sage: timeit('ZZ.gens',number=10^6)
sage: timeit('ZZ.an_element',number=10^6)
100 loops, best
William,
grumpy o' pa
There is a strong technical issue that needs to be resolved, and for
which I explicitly take the blame. And I understand your frustration
when fighting with zillions of technical points. However I perceived
your e-mail as unfairly bashing the sage-combinat
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 03:04:22PM +0200, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
I made an error while correcting the series file (relative to the
patch that appeared at the end of the file). My first attempt was to
correct it but while starting Sage I get
I decided to disabling mupad-interface which
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
William,
grumpy o' pa
There is a strong technical issue that needs to be resolved, and for
which I explicitly take the blame. And I understand your frustration
when fighting with zillions of
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
I just had a look at the Python sources (in Object/typeobject.c), and
it's all about the difference between slot_tp_getattro and
slot_tp_getattr_hook, the later being a bit more complicated than the
former. I
