[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Is it really needed to make the parent class of a category depend on its base ring?

Hi Nicolas, On 10 Okt., 15:53, "Nicolas M. Thiery" wrote: > Speaking of the latter, +1 on using directly Python's implementation > if at all possible. Probably it isn't. The only thing that people on sage-devel pointed me to was a function implemented in C that assumes to receive a list of types

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Is it really needed to make the parent class of a category depend on its base ring?

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 05:36:29AM -0700, Simon King wrote: > Is there already a ticket for the problem discussed here ("Make > parent_class and element_class independent of the base ring, whenever > possible")? > > Is there a ticket for a related topic that is marked "FixMe" in sage/ > categories

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Is it really needed to make the parent class of a category depend on its base ring?

Hi all! Is there already a ticket for the problem discussed here ("Make parent_class and element_class independent of the base ring, whenever possible")? Is there a ticket for a related topic that is marked "FixMe" in sage/ categories/category.py: "Use Python's method resolution order in all_supe