Hi!
Working on some patch, I get the following doctest errors in combinat/
sf/dual.py
File "/mnt/local/king/SAGE/broken/devel/sage-main/sage/combinat/sf/
dual.py", line 185:
sage: l(f._to_self_cache) # note: this may depend on possible
previous computations!
Expected:
[([1, 1], [([1, 1], 2), ([2], 1)]), ([2], [([1, 1], 1), ([2],
1)])]
Got:
[([], [([], 1)]), ([1, 1], [([1, 1], 2), ([2], 1)]), ([2], [([1,
1], 1), ([2], 1)])]
**********************************************************************
File "/mnt/local/king/SAGE/broken/devel/sage-main/sage/combinat/sf/
dual.py", line 187:
sage: l(f._from_self_cache)
Expected:
[([1, 1], [([1, 1], 1), ([2], -1)]), ([2], [([1, 1], -1), ([2],
2)])]
Got:
[([], [([], 1)]), ([1, 1], [([1, 1], 1), ([2], -1)]), ([2], [([1,
1], -1), ([2], 2)])]
It states that this may depend on possible previous computations. Is
there really no work around? Such as, using an object that is not
considered in any other doc test? Is the new result correct? Shouldn't
both tests better be marked as "random"?
Best regards,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
