Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Categories and the top level

2015-04-16 Thread Nathann Cohen
Hello, As for putting them in a catalog: I don't have a strong opinion. As > long as we I can put in my .sagerc: > > sage: from categories import * > > I am all good with it if someone volunteers. > This very syntax was something that the code guys wanted to implement recently. Volker de

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Categories and the top level

2015-04-15 Thread Daniel Krenn
Am 2015-04-14 um 23:51 schrieb John H Palmieri: > [...] Would it be > preferable to have a catalog of categories accessible via > "categories.AdditiveMagmas()", etc.? +1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To unsubscribe fro

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Categories and the top level

2015-04-14 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Hi John, On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:51:14PM -0700, John H Palmieri wrote: >I've been wondering lately about the design choice of having all of the >various categories accessible at the top-level in Sage. Would it be >preferable to have a catalog of categories accessible via >