On 4/23/11 12:56 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 08:15:40AM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
On 4/22/11 3:49 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 07:49:34PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
On 4/17/11 9:59 AM, Florent Hivert wrote:
You should'nt simply disable the
Hi Nicolas,
On 23 Apr., 15:39, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> It would be great if sage -docbuild would complain about them.
It does complain. The warning usually mentions a missing indentation,
or mentions a missing end of a quotation block and so on.
But often the warning message is not very cl
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 03:27:07PM +0200, Florent hivert wrote:
> Rereading a few patch, I've found a bunch of systematically wrong Sphinx
> markup. Just to make sure, let me recall a few fact about ReST and Sphinx.
Oups, many were mines ... Thanks for the tips!
It would be great if sage -docbuil
Hi there,
Rereading a few patch, I've found a bunch of systematically wrong Sphinx
markup. Just to make sure, let me recall a few fact about ReST and Sphinx.
First of all, when I'm unsure of a markup, I found [1] quite helpful as well
as concise. When a more advanced markup is needed I ofte
Hi there,
> > I just created a poset using the new category. It seems to work except for
> >
> > sage: TestSuite(poset).run()
> > [...]
> > AssertionError: Not implemented method: antichains
> >
> > The followi
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 08:15:40AM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> On 4/22/11 3:49 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> >On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 07:49:34PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> >>On 4/17/11 9:59 AM, Florent Hivert wrote:
> >>>You should'nt simply disable them but add a guard against 4.7.1 with a
