On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:48:55AM -0800, Simon King wrote:
It may fix the plot problem, but it probably doesn't fix the bug
that I was fixing at #12351. Namely, the patch from #10998 does not
change the __eq__ method of poset elements. Hence, you would still
have that comparing a poset
Hi Nicolas,
On 27 Jan., 15:01, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
With the Sage-Combinat queue installed, I get:
sage: P = Poset([[1,2],[4],[3],[4],[]])
sage: P(0) == int(0)
False
OK, that probably means that the original bug (namely __eq__ assuming
that both
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 03:11:23PM -0800, Simon King wrote:
OK, that probably means that the original bug (namely __eq__ assuming
that both arguments are poset elements) is indeed fixed by coercion
I will double check!
If it is the case, then I suggest that you also add the
P(0)==int(0)
