Re: [sage-combinat-devel] comments/questions on poset code

2012-02-15 Thread Anne Schilling
On 2/14/12 2:33 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:05:21PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote: No. It is really a different poset, see: ... which returns the original poset. But to_poset gives Q from the above computation. Ok; out of curiosity, why do you need the relabelled

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] comments/questions on poset code

2012-02-15 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi Florent, Thanks for your answer. I pushed the first framework of the code (some methods are still missing), but I get some doc-test failures regarding categories which I am not sure how to fix. I think the problem is that the elements LinearExtensionsOfPoset are not in its parent, but

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: coxeter groups in python

2012-02-15 Thread Dima Pasechnik
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.combinat.devel, you wrote: I tried to do some computations with the existing Iwahori-Hecke algebra module inside sage earlier this year. I needed to work over the rational function field C(x), for an indeterminate x. In the end I gave up and went back to using