I just marked it as needs work. it needs a (trivial, hopefully) rebase
for Sage 5.2.rc0.
Dima
On Tuesday, 24 July 2012 10:19:56 UTC+8, Andrew Mathas wrote:
Hi Jason,
What is the status of your patch #9265? It is not marked as needing review
and I'd actually assumed it was already merged
Hi All!
I guarded Mark's patch for sage-5.2.rc0 since he will only be able to rebase
it next week.
The queue should now apply also for sage-5.2.rc0, but a lot of patches had
to be guarded. Please check the queue to see whether your patch is marked
#+5_2_rc0 needs rebase on 5_2_rc0!!!
and
Hey Andrew,
Here's my 2 cents.
1. When I am doing lot of calculations I often generate a large amount of
output and, consequently, I like this output to be as concise and readable
as possible. Most of the _repr_ and _str_ methods
do not achieve this.
What do people think about
On 7/24/12 6:06 PM, Daniel Bump wrote:
The symmetric function patch #5457 is a big step towards being
able to work with the Hopf algebra of symmetric functions.
I am glad you appreciate the new functionalities!
Here's an interesting fact. Recall that the elements of the
symmetric function
