Vincent and Dan thanks for the replies.
Just to clarify, Vincent said:
Dependencies should be used in trac (it is one of the field in the
definition of the ticket and consists an a (possibly empty) sequence of
patches).
but, as Dan implied, the dependency field in trac if for when a patch
Hi Andrew,
On 2012-07-30, Vincent Delecroix 20100.delecr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Dependencies should be used in trac (it is one of the field in the
definition of the ticket and consists an a (possibly empty) sequence
of patches). An example at [1]. When a patch is ready in
I have rebased Jason's patch and against 5.2-rc0.I am checking the doctests
etc. When I am done I will repost the patch to trac and the queue.
There was a message on sage-release that Sage 5.2 is now
available. It would be good to test it on that.
Hi Keeler,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:14:41PM -0700, Keeler Russell wrote:
I've been working on a function to calculate the chromatic symmetric
function (a.k.a. CSF) of a graph as part of a related research project.
You can find the code here: https://github.com/keeler/csf
I have rebased Jason's patch so that it apples to 5.2-rc0.
I also uploaded the new patch to trac, where I had to rename the patch as
trac would not give me permission to delete some one else's patch. The
patch probably won't apply cleanly to 5.2-rc0 for trivial reasons (white
space) as it
ps. I put a +5.2 guard on the patch
concrete_combinatorial_statistics_and_maps-cs.patch
as it didn't apply cleanly to files that I hadn't touched. (I also guarded
my patch trac_X-Kleshchev-partitions-am.patch which I forgot to do when
I uploaded it earlier).
Andrew
--
You received this
I also uploaded the new patch to trac, where I had to rename the patch as
trac would not give me permission to delete some one else's patch. The
patch probably won't apply cleanly to 5.2-rc0 for trivial reasons (white
space)
It should apply cleanly to 5.2. Assuming you fix that and repost
It should apply cleanly to 5.2. Assuming you fix that and repost it,
unfortunately, 9265 does not apply anymore on 5.1...
Best, Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-combinat-devel group.
To post to this group, send email to
Christian Stump wrote:
unfortunately, 9265 does not apply anymore on 5.1...
I think a lot of patches are broke on 5.1 right now. Here is a partial list.
trac_5457-review-as.patch
trac_9265_tableaux_categories_jb.patch
trac_12774-coxeter-ms.patch
Sorry, I forgot the guard for trac_5457-review-as.patch and just added it!
Anne
On 7/30/12 8:12 PM, Daniel Bump wrote:
Christian Stump wrote:
unfortunately, 9265 does not apply anymore on 5.1...
I think a lot of patches are broke on 5.1 right now. Here is a partial list.
Hi All!
Since there were some nonlocal changes in sage-5.1, I think it would be best if
all
developers now switch to sage-5.2 and we focus our efforts on rebasing all
patches
to this new version of sage (instead of trying to keep backwards compatibilty
for much longer).
Best,
Anne
On 7/30/12
Dear Dan and Christian,
I have rebased 9265 so that it applies on 5.1 but I haven't uploaded it as
I wanted to rename it and make sure that I don't clobber anything else in
the 5.1 or 5.2 queues. The main problem is that even though the queue
applies on 5.2 sage does not run due -- so far --
12 matches
Mail list logo
