On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:41:47AM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Thanks for fixing this!
> The category categories/classical_crystals.py already had an import QQ
> before my patch (and it is still there). Should this be removed as well?
If you feel like it, sure, go ahead (note: I am only speakin
Hi Nicolas,
> - Starting from trac_8327_universal_cyclotomic_field-cs.patch, Sage
> startup was broken due to an import loop. That was in fact due to
> the Crystal category recently importing parent:
> CombinatorialFreeModule, QQ (which category code should not do).
Thanks for fixing this!
On 10/10/12 9:04 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 05:59:48PM +0200, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
>> For naming convention, I would like to see Recursive and I don't
>> understand why there is a Search in the name ? It is more an
>> exhaustion than a search, isn't it ?
>
> Well, t
> And then
> {{{
> sage: S = SearchForest(roots = [''], children = children)
> sage: list(S.elements_of_depth(4))
> ['abac', 'abca', 'abcb', 'acab', 'acba', 'acbc', 'babc', 'baca',
> 'bacb', 'bcab', 'bcac', 'bcba', 'caba', 'cabc', 'cacb', 'cbab',
> 'cbac', 'cbca']
> sage: S.elements_of_depth_iterat
Hi Simon,
> On 2012-10-10, Florent Hivert wrote:
> > I'd like to gather proposal and find an agreement on the names for
> > SearchForest and post_process.
>
> I don't know if my answer to sage-devel will automatically appear here
> as well. If not: I suggested "RecursiveSet" and "branch_cut"
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 05:59:48PM +0200, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
> For naming convention, I would like to see Recursive and I don't
> understand why there is a Search in the name ? It is more an
> exhaustion than a search, isn't it ?
Well, that was just a keyword, hoping it would ring a bell wit
Hi,
> Thanks to Nicolas the Little, Sage has a SearchForest class. It is a very nice
> tools to iterate through sets defined by a recursive choice
> tree. Unfortunately, currently due to the name someone who doesn't know that
> it exists has no chance to find it. It seems that there is an agreemen
Dear Sage-Combinat fans, dear Rob,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 03:02:50PM +0200, Florent Hivert wrote:
> I'd like to gather proposal and find an agreement on the names for
> SearchForest and post_process.
>
> Here are some proposal for search forest:
> - TreeGeneratedSet
> - ForestGeneratedS
Dear Florent,
On 2012-10-10, Florent Hivert wrote:
> I'd like to gather proposal and find an agreement on the names for
> SearchForest and post_process.
I don't know if my answer to sage-devel will automatically appear here
as well. If not: I suggested "RecursiveSet" and "branch_cut" as new
name
Hi There,
Thanks to Nicolas the Little, Sage has a SearchForest class. It is a very nice
tools to iterate through sets defined by a recursive choice
tree. Unfortunately, currently due to the name someone who doesn't know that
it exists has no chance to find it. It seems that there is an agre
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 02:59:14PM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
> Fernando posted this (below) on the IPython-dev list. This looks
> like a really impressive take on how to interact with Python code.
> It's using Jython, so not immediately usable for us. But if we
> could do these things from the no
Hi Florent,
> The doc currently doesn't compile (at least on sage-5.3 upto
> map_reduce.patch).
>
> [...]
>
> Vincent: can you fix it ?
Done!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-comb
Hi Andrew, Anne,
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 06:02:51PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> I get the same problem as Andrew if the queue is applied up to
> trac_12895-subcategory-methods-nt.patch
> on sage-5.4.rc0. However, before I was working up to
> trac_12774-coxeter-ms.patch which is higher
13 matches
Mail list logo
