On Tuesday, 17 July 2012 12:55:13 UTC+8, Keshav Kini wrote:
Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com writes:
On Monday, 16 July 2012 20:49:31 UTC+8, Keshav Kini wrote:
Not really. That's only if you do `hg import --exact`, and your
patch
has the correct headers.
yes, but it
what I usually do is:
this is a very nice and detailed description -- thanks! maybe you
wanna add it to wiki?
* hg qrefresh followed by hg export qtip foo.patch
is there, in this situation, a difference between hg export qtip
foo.patch and hg qrefresh (that's what I usually do here) ?
Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de writes:
Hi Frederic,
what I usually do is:
* When I have a patch foo.patch that needs rebasing, then I take a
Sage installations with all required prerequisites (i.e.,
the dependencies of foo.patch).
* Then, I try to apply foo.patch (i.e., hg
Christian Stump
christian.st...@gmail.com writes:
is there, in this situation, a difference between hg export qtip
foo.patch and hg qrefresh (that's what I usually do here) ?
`hg qrefresh` adds uncommitted changes into the topmost patch; `hg
export qtip foo.patch` simply copies the existing
This pain is caused by mq (sorry, mq, you are evil. live with it :-)).
Just pretending that the patch is a regular patch, importing it with hg
import
would land you in a workflow very much like the git's workflow for the
problem Ralf described.
(git doesn't really have an advantage here, rather
Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com writes:
This pain is caused by mq (sorry, mq, you are evil. live with it
:-)).
Just pretending that the patch is a regular patch, importing it with
hg import
would land you in a workflow very much like the git's workflow for
the
problem Ralf described.
Not
On Monday, 16 July 2012 20:49:31 UTC+8, Keshav Kini wrote:
Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com writes:
This pain is caused by mq (sorry, mq, you are evil. live with it
:-)).
Just pretending that the patch is a regular patch, importing it with
hg import
would land you in a workflow
Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com writes:
On Monday, 16 July 2012 20:49:31 UTC+8, Keshav Kini wrote:
Not really. That's only if you do `hg import --exact`, and your
patch
has the correct headers.
yes, but it should have them if its creator had
[diff]
git = 1
in her/his .hgrc.
