On Jan 22, 2008 8:58 PM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 22-Jan-08, at 6:00 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> >
> > On Jan 22, 2008 9:45 AM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi everyone, I have no idea if this is true, or if it was auto-
> >> generated and is spam,
On Jan 22, 2008 4:51 PM, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 22, 2008, at 5:41 AM, mhampton wrote:
>
> > I think this could be an exciting way to get all the java applet
> > makers out there interested in sage, although I don't completely
> > understand the architecture of what t
On 22-Jan-08, at 6:00 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Jan 22, 2008 9:45 AM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone, I have no idea if this is true, or if it was auto-
>> generated and is spam, or what, but some people here might care.
>>
>
> I care. I just tried this and in
On Jan 23, 5:39 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2008 7:17 PM, mabshoff
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > But in the end it boils down to this: Do people want universal
> > binaries, considering the size tradoff? I do think so, but I hope this
> > isn't like the liv
On Jan 22, 2008 7:17 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But in the end it boils down to this: Do people want universal
> binaries, considering the size tradoff? I do think so, but I hope this
> isn't like the live-CD where everybody says that it is a good idea but
> when push comes to sho
Hi Andrey,
Some of that is code that is still under a bit of development so I did
not expose it. In particular, I haven't thought in depth about the
design for how all of the Lie theory stuff will go together.
--Mike
On Jan 22, 2008 4:51 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Wh
On Jan 22, 2008, at 5:41 AM, mhampton wrote:
> I think this could be an exciting way to get all the java applet
> makers out there interested in sage, although I don't completely
> understand the architecture of what this is supposed to do.
The way I understand it, JASON is a simple format to se
Hi Justin,
On Jan 23, 3:55 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2008, at 6:15 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > On Jan 23, 2:59 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Jan 22, 2008 1:48 AM, boyfarrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
> >> None of us know how t
On 22-Jan-08, at 6:03 PM, Ted Kosan wrote:
>
> Justin wrote:
>
>> It's not true that testing GUIs is in any way impossible (I believe
>> several companies make such products, and make a pretty good living
>> at it).
>>
>> However, I don't think there is a freely-available way to do it, and
>> in
On Jan 22, 2008, at 6:15 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2:59 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Jan 22, 2008 1:48 AM, boyfarrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>> None of us know how to make one for a program as complicated as Sage
>> (i.e., a 5 million line program that co
>
> On Jan 19, 9:51 pm, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I created a 1-page Quick Reference Guide for Sage (used last week in a
> > 4-day segment of an undergrad course at Chapman University). It is
> > available
> > athttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/jipsen/sageqref/sageqref.
On Jan 22, 2008 3:46 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thoughts on this thread:
>
> For finite fields (or any other fields) the concept of additive
> generator makes no sense -- only finite prime fields have one and it
> is hardly a useful concept then since every nonzero element is
On Jan 23, 2:59 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2008 1:48 AM, boyfarrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello,
>
> > Thanks for the reply. I don't mind building it from source. Just
> > wanted to check that it would work before I tried.
>
> > One could contact H
On Jan 22, 2008 9:45 AM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone, I have no idea if this is true, or if it was auto-
> generated and is spam, or what, but some people here might care.
>
I care. I just tried this and indeed it reduced the size of the sage-vmware
tarball by over
Justin wrote:
> It's not true that testing GUIs is in any way impossible (I believe
> several companies make such products, and make a pretty good living
> at it).
>
> However, I don't think there is a freely-available way to do it, and
> in this aspect, your point is well-taken, and reinforces t
On Jan 22, 2008 1:48 AM, boyfarrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for the reply. I don't mind building it from source. Just
> wanted to check that it would work before I tried.
>
> One could contact HPC (http://hpc.sourceforge.net/) to provide binary
> support for sage on the Ma
On Jan 22, 2008 4:51 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why the module sage.combinat.dynkin_diagram is not listed on the
> module index page http://sagemath.org/doc/html/ref/modindex.html ?
Code in Sage is only listed in the "print" reference manual when it is
sufficiently stab
Why the module sage.combinat.dynkin_diagram is not listed on the
module index page http://sagemath.org/doc/html/ref/modindex.html ?
Andrey
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send e
On Jan 22, 11:34 pm, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Sage team,
>
> in reply to myself, in the hope to clearify things:
>
> > After installing gnutls, building was successful. However, I was
> > unable to run the notebook in the alpha-versions.
>
> I mean: saying "./sage -notebook",
On Jan 23, 12:09 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2008, at 1:30 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 22, 2008 10:20 AM, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Is there a good reason why the file 'sage-2.9.1.txt'
> >> is at the top-level of sage-2.10?=
>
> > It'
On Jan 22, 2008, at 1:30 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Jan 22, 2008 10:20 AM, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Is there a good reason why the file 'sage-2.9.1.txt'
>> is at the top-level of sage-2.10?=
>
> It's a mistake. It's actually not in the current sage-2.10.tar
> tarball in the to
On Jan 22, 2008, at 9:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>> I think this could be an exciting way to get all the java applet
>>> makers out there interested in sage, although I don't completely
>>> understand the architecture of what this is supposed to do.
>>
>> Wouldn't a Java applet imply tha
On Jan 22, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Nick Alexander wrote:
> On 22-Jan-08, at 9:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this could be an exciting way to get all the java applet
makers out there interested in sage, although I don't completely
understand the architecture of what this is supp
On Jan 22, 2008, at 5:54 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
>> I think this could be an exciting way to get all the java applet
>> makers out there interested in sage, although I don't completely
>> understand the architecture of what this is supposed to do.
>
> Wouldn't a Java applet imply that the f
On Jan 22, 2008 1:57 PM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd imagine one would do it the same was as doctests, (almost) always
> > assigning to a variable and then spitting out the string if it is not
> > None... This doesn't solve the issue printing things from within a
> > function
On Jan 22, 2008 11:02 AM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> A while ago some of us were talking about ways to draw things in the web
> browser. Apparently Firefox, Safari, and Opera already support using
> the canvas element to draw images in a web browser. See
> http://labs.mininova.
On 21-Jan-08, at 10:21 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 20, 2008, at 11:13 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> On Jan 20, 2008 2:58 PM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 20-Jan-08, at 2:47 PM, Simon King wrote:
>>>
Dear Nick
On Jan 20, 8:24 pm, Ni
On Jan 22, 2008 10:20 AM, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there a good reason why the file 'sage-2.9.1.txt'
> is at the top-level of sage-2.10?=
It's a mistake. It's actually not in the current sage-2.10.tar
tarball in the top level if you just extract it. I wonder how it
gets put in th
I've just taken a break from trying to debug the problem where
notebook fails
to respond to clicks on 'evaluate' to try out some bits of Sage that
I'd not
yet used: symbolic algebra.
I had typed in a simple bit of code
{{{
var('a'); var('b'); var('c')
|
}}}
{{{
c = pi - a - b
|
}}}
The first cell
I've been doing some more investigating this problem. William has
reported it in Opera and I've
just been testing using Internet Explorer (yuk). I started Wireshark
(used to be called Ethereal)
to monitor traffic between my rarely-used Windows box and my Linux
laptop which is running
the notebook
Jason wrote:
> Apparently (according to the HTML5 draft) eventually we will have a 3d
> canvas in HTML. It seems like that will be really nice since then the
> 3d drawing would presumably be done by the browser (i.e., fast).
This technology looks like it has great potential :-)
Ted
--~--~
William wrote:
> I propose the following:
>
> (1) Json support is made an optional package
> (2) Once there are some actual interesting uses of it, then we
>seriously consider making it a standard package. (This could
>be a week from now, etc.)
+1
Ted
--~--~-~--~--
On Jan 22, 2008 5:41 AM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree - an optional package makes more sense for the moment. The
> spkg is less than a mb, fortunately, so adding it to the standard
> packages eventually wouldn't inflate the total size that much.
I propose the following:
(1)
It's easier for me to just download the new binary than to try to fix
this, but for development purposes the following messages may be
useful:
sage: An error occurred while installing ntl-5.4.1.p10
Please email sage-devel http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
explaining the problem and send t
A while ago some of us were talking about ways to draw things in the web
browser. Apparently Firefox, Safari, and Opera already support using
the canvas element to draw images in a web browser. See
http://labs.mininova.org/canvas/ for some examples or
http://www.abrahamjoffe.com.au/ben/canv
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Nick Alexander wrote:
> >>> I would like to establish some (roughly) like this: If a
> >>> computation cannot be
> >>> expressed from the command line (in pure Python) then it cannot be
> >>> a standard
> >>> part of Sage. E.g. if you cannot compute $sin(x)$ for some $x$
> >
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
[...]
>
> The toybuchberger doctest currently fails spectacularly, but
> aside from that all doctests should work. I am assuming that
> Martin Albrecht will fix that one easily once he is able to
> reproduce it.
>
To answer your question in IRC: yes it is reprodu
Carl Witty wrote:
> On Jan 21, 1:31 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> dortmund.de> wrote:
>> On Jan 21, 5:44 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> mabshoff wrote:
>>> For now, we could have some custom queries that look for "patch" in the
>>> title of an issue to somewhat narrow down the lis
Is there a good reason why the file 'sage-2.9.1.txt'
is at the top-level of sage-2.10?
Kate
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visi
On Jan 21, 1:31 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Jan 21, 5:44 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> mabshoff wrote:
> > For now, we could have some custom queries that look for "patch" in the
> > title of an issue to somewhat narrow down the list, right?
>
> Anybody w
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
>
> On 22-Jan-08, at 9:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
I think this could be an exciting way to get all the java applet
makers out there interested in sage, although I don't completely
understand the architecture of what this is
On 22-Jan-08, at 9:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>> I think this could be an exciting way to get all the java applet
>>> makers out there interested in sage, although I don't completely
>>> understand the architecture of what this is supposed to do.
>>
>> Wouldn't a Java applet imply that t
Hi everyone, I have no idea if this is true, or if it was auto-
generated and is spam, or what, but some people here might care.
Nick
Begin forwarded message:
> From: lou blaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: January 22, 2008 7:41:18 AM PST
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Sage download procedu
>> I think this could be an exciting way to get all the java applet
>> makers out there interested in sage, although I don't completely
>> understand the architecture of what this is supposed to do.
>
> Wouldn't a Java applet imply that the functionality it provides could only be
> accessed via Sa
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
[...]
>
> The toybuchberger doctest currently fails spectacularly, but
> aside from that all doctests should work. I am assuming that
> Martin Albrecht will fix that one easily once he is able to
> reproduce it.
>
Yes toybuchberger failed and this one on Fedora 7:
> I think this could be an exciting way to get all the java applet
> makers out there interested in sage, although I don't completely
> understand the architecture of what this is supposed to do.
Wouldn't a Java applet imply that the functionality it provides could only be
accessed via Sage's we
I agree - an optional package makes more sense for the moment. The
spkg is less than a mb, fortunately, so adding it to the standard
packages eventually wouldn't inflate the total size that much.
There are several optional packages that I use a lot and I hope to
eventually have in sage as standa
On Jan 22, 2008 5:05 AM, Ted Kosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> William wrote:
>
> > > If further testing is successful, I would like to have simpleJSON
> > > included in SAGE. What procedure do I need to follow in order to make
> > > an official software addition request?
> >
> > (1) Convince
Thoughts on this thread:
For finite fields (or any other fields) the concept of additive
generator makes no sense -- only finite prime fields have one and it
is hardly a useful concept then since every nonzero element is one.
It's different if talking about generators (plural!) which I think is
w
William wrote:
> > If further testing is successful, I would like to have simpleJSON
> > included in SAGE. What procedure do I need to follow in order to make
> > an official software addition request?
>
> (1) Convince us it's a good idea. You basically just did that.
>
> (2) Create a trac tick
On Monday 21 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That shouldn't be caused by anything William has described doing, but is a
> bug. What operating system, and version of firefox are you using?
>
This is getting cross-threaded - see the thread:
Sage 2.10.alpha notebook problem
for the details
Hi Williams,
On Jan 22, 8:52 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 21, 2008 11:36 PM, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 22, 8:04 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > dortmund.de> wrote:
>
> > > > On the funny side of things my regular copy fails the calculu
Hello folks,
this is 2.10.1.alpha1. This is the fruit of two days merging
quite a number of patches and I had planned to release this about
24 hours ago, but ran into some very odd segfault in one of the
doctests. After applying another bunch of patches it went away.
The interesting bit was that
53 matches
Mail list logo
