I've Debianized the GAP Guava package and scipy_sandbox packages, so now
the tests related to those pass.
However, I seem to have one new doctest failure.
sage -t devel/doc/const/const.tex
**
File
Hey Dan,
The testdoc.py file looks to be right. I just upgraded to Ubuntu 8.04
(32bit) and could not reproduce the problem with the 2.11 binary
posted on sagemath.org.
Has anyone else seen the problem Dan reported in 2.11?
Cheers,
Yi
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Dan Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since the Debian distribution of SAGE uses Maxima with GCL list, I figured
I'd run the benchmarks Mike posted on my installation. The SAGE times are
comparable to those in Mike's test, while the Maxima tests are faster:
sage: load /home/tabbott/fermat_gcd_1var.py
sage: time a = p1.gcd(p2,
On Mar 31, 10:55 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Roman Pearce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need Algorithms for Computer Algebra by Geddes, Czapor, and
Labahn:
Chapter 5: Chinese Remainder Theorem
Chapter 6: Newton's Iteration and Hensel
Hi!
Suprise, there exists a tutorial for PolyBoRi.
http://polybori.sourceforge.net/doc/tutorial/index.html
It is available in tex-format under
doc/tutorial/tutorial.tex
in our source distribution.
think it would be nice, to include it in the SAGE documentation in
some way.
I started this
On Apr 1, 12:46 pm, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like a good idea, and certainly vastly better than my gp code
which was really only a toy.
I CC'ed this so sge-devel.
John
On 01/04/2008, Martin Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
let me (ab)use this
On Apr 1, 10:41 am, shreevatsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone else was trying to do something, and I tried something and got
a crash; mabshoff asked me to post a backtrace. (So if it is very
long, don't blame me ;-))
This is probably invalid mathematics that should raise an exception,
Someone else was trying to do something, and I tried something and got
a crash; mabshoff asked me to post a backtrace. (So if it is very
long, don't blame me ;-))
This is probably invalid mathematics that should raise an exception,
but it causes a crash instead on my OS X 10.4. The other person
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Robert Dodier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:34 AM
Subject: [Maxima] Maxima 5.15 release branch scheduled for April 5
To: Maxima List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I am planning to make the 5.15 release branch on April 5
On Apr 1, 8:58 am, root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Abshoff made that comment. He's motivated by wanting
to port Sage to a wide range of architectures and keep everything
maintainable, since he works incredibly hard on that. He suffers
a huge amount trying to deal with build issues
Roman, I thoroughly agree with you that the multipolygcd and factoring
problem is not going to go away overnight. I'm sure by your comments
that you can guess what we've been doing with FLINT for univariate gcd
and how long even that is taking.
Also, I too get frustrated by some of the
On 1 Apr, 05:21, Mike Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've posted some benchmarks
athttp://wiki.sagemath.org/MultivariateGCDBenchmarks.
--Mike
I can't do timings for the degree 1000 or 2000 (at least Allan Steel
gives it as degree 2000, whereas your page Mike seems to say it is
degree
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:39 AM, Michael Brickenstein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Suprise, there exists a tutorial for PolyBoRi.
http://polybori.sourceforge.net/doc/tutorial/index.html
It is available in tex-format under
doc/tutorial/tutorial.tex
in our source distribution.
On Apr 1, 9:54 am, bill purvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 30, 2008, at 19:37 , William Stein wrote: Hello folks,
Sage 2.11 has been released on March 30th, 2008. It is available at
http://sagemath.org/download.html
Built on my poor little laptop. Toshiba - 2.9GHz Celeron,
On Mar 30, 2008, at 19:37 , William Stein wrote:
Hello folks,
Sage 2.11 has been released on March 30th, 2008. It is available at
http://sagemath.org/download.html
Built on my poor little laptop. Toshiba - 2.9GHz Celeron, 512MB RAM.
Still having some problems with the evaluate
Hi,
if you look at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/RecentChanges?max_days=14
you will see once again some idiot spammers creating crap pages in the
wiki. While we aren't too badly effected by Spam I think it has gotten
worst over time. So what should we do?
a) The wiki has a Spam detection system,
On Apr 1, 2:57 pm, Harald Schilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
b) install a Captcha.
+1
this one is good and usefulhttp://recaptcha.net/
c) Just like trac hand out account[s] ...
-1
Yeah. I forgot to mention that I consider this as a last resort type
of solution after (a) and (b) have
On Apr 1, 2008, at 4:53 AM, mabshoff wrote:
On Apr 1, 10:41 am, shreevatsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone else was trying to do something, and I tried something and
got
a crash; mabshoff asked me to post a backtrace. (So if it is very
long, don't blame me ;-))
This is probably
Hi,
I downloaded sage-2.11.tar and did make on 2 machines, both 64-bit
Debian.
One went fine, make test is still running but seems ok.
The other make failed
install log: http://www.yobi.be/files/install.log.bz2 (300k)
tail:
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: executing depfiles
On Apr 1, 5:42 pm, philt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded sage-2.11.tar and did make on 2 machines, both 64-bit
Debian.
One went fine, make test is still running but seems ok.
The other make failed
install log:http://www.yobi.be/files/install.log.bz2(300k)
SNIP
You g++
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:52 AM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 1, 5:42 pm, philt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded sage-2.11.tar and did make on 2 machines, both 64-bit
Debian.
One went fine, make test is still running but seems ok.
The other make
Hi,
Sage motivation is to create a viable alternative to Ma*.
There are also people, who don't need an alternative to Ma*, but
rather a good library, read for example this email from Gael:
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy/msg/f8f497d1d32fab30
who works on Mayavi2 (yet we have paraview3,
On Apr 1, 5:57 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:52 AM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 1, 5:42 pm, philt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded sage-2.11.tar and did make on 2 machines, both 64-bit
Debian.
One went fine,
I wonder if he has enough RAM? Maybe gcc does dumb things
when there isn't enough ram sometimes.
Well, I would assume that the OOM killer might do something stupid. If
malloc fails inside gcc I would expect it to die gracefully. Maybe
Phil should check /var/log/messages for any signs
Right now pulling in group theory may end up pulling in calculus. There are
similar issues all over with really tight coupling between subsystems. It
ought to be possible to use group theory (maybe without a feature or two)
without calculus and vice versa.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Nick
Maybe. I see two real issues.
1) Sage right now has really bad global namespace pollution issues that make
it very hard to import just one or two files. I don't see why this
shouldn't be fixable, it just needs someone to work on it. This would not
be that hard, and would probably catch some
On 1-Apr-08, at 10:36 AM, Gary Furnish wrote:
Right now pulling in group theory may end up pulling in calculus.
There are similar issues all over with really tight coupling
between subsystems. It ought to be possible to use group theory
(maybe without a feature or two) without
On 1-Apr-08, at 10:21 AM, Gary Furnish wrote:
Maybe. I see two real issues.
1) Sage right now has really bad global namespace pollution issues
that make it very hard to import just one or two files. I don't
see why this shouldn't be fixable, it just needs someone to work on
it.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Sage motivation is to create a viable alternative to Ma*.
There are also people, who don't need an alternative to Ma*, but
rather a good library, read for example this email from Gael:
On Apr 1, 2008, at 5:43 AM, mabshoff wrote:
Hi,
if you look at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/RecentChanges?max_days=14
you will see once again some idiot spammers creating crap pages in the
wiki. While we aren't too badly effected by Spam I think it has gotten
worst over time. So what should
On Apr 1, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Nick Alexander wrote:
On 1-Apr-08, at 10:36 AM, Gary Furnish wrote:
Right now pulling in group theory may end up pulling in calculus.
There are similar issues all over with really tight coupling
between subsystems. It ought to be possible to use group theory
On Apr 1, 2008, at 6:15 AM, David Harvey wrote:
On Apr 1, 2008, at 4:53 AM, mabshoff wrote:
On Apr 1, 10:41 am, shreevatsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone else was trying to do something, and I tried something and
got
a crash; mabshoff asked me to post a backtrace. (So if it is very
On Apr 1, 11:23 am, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Apr 1, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Nick Alexander wrote:
On 1-Apr-08, at 10:36 AM, Gary Furnish wrote:
Right now pulling in group theory may end up pulling in calculus.
There are similar issues all over with really tight coupling
Is it safe for me to wait until 3.0 before learning what the new
coercion model actually is, or should I do that now if I want any new
functionality to be merged into 3.0?
John
On 01/04/2008, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 1, 2008, at 6:15 AM, David Harvey wrote:
On Apr
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:46 PM, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it safe for me to wait until 3.0 before learning what the new
coercion model actually is, or should I do that now if I want any new
functionality to be merged into 3.0?
Sage 3.0 will be released soon -- hopefully
On Apr 1, 2008, at 12:51 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:46 PM, John Cremona
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it safe for me to wait until 3.0 before learning what the new
coercion model actually is, or should I do that now if I want
any new
functionality to be merged
Robert,
I briefly looked over your coercion model.
_repr_ This is the easiest way to define how your object prints
It should take a string representing your object
I takes one argument, do_latex
I might comment that Axiom uses an output domain that exports functions
for
Wierd circular import issues can (should) be solved with circular cdef
imports. I think the easiest fix to crazy deps (group theory on calculus)
might be to do something alone the lines of
foo = None
def importcrazydeps():
import sage.foo as localfoo
foo = localfoo
Then have
On Apr 1, 2008, at 2:33 PM, root wrote:
Robert,
I briefly looked over your coercion model.
_repr_ This is the easiest way to define how your object prints
It should take a string representing your object
I takes one argument, do_latex
I might comment that Axiom uses an
Separate from the coercion model, I have some ideas for changing where
printing code lives (see the section on printers at the bottom of
http://www.sagemath.org:9001/days7/coercion). I agree that it should
be easy to implement output into other formats, and I'll keep that in
mind when I actually
On Apr 1, 2008, at 1:23 PM, Gary Furnish wrote:
Wierd circular import issues can (should) be solved with circular
cdef imports. I think the easiest fix to crazy deps (group theory
on calculus) might be to do something alone the lines of
foo = None
def importcrazydeps():
global foo
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Robert Bradshaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 1, 2008, at 1:23 PM, Gary Furnish wrote:
Wierd circular import issues can (should) be solved with circular
cdef imports. I think the easiest fix to crazy deps (group theory
on calculus) might be to do
On Apr 1, 2008, at 1:50 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Robert Bradshaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 1, 2008, at 1:23 PM, Gary Furnish wrote:
Wierd circular import issues can (should) be solved with circular
cdef imports. I think the easiest fix to crazy deps
On 01/04/2008, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. We're making good progress on the new coercion model (David Roe
and I were working on it last night, he finished Rings), but it is
not 3.0 material (both for timing and stability reasons).
Thanks for the explanation.
To find
Why not use import sage.rings.integer_ring as module_integer_ring. If the
location changes, just change what it is imported as.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Robert Bradshaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 1, 2008, at 1:50 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Robert
--- doc-main-2.11.0/tut/tutworks.tex2008-03-31 13:11:51.0 +1000
+++ doc-main-2.11.1/tut/tutworks.tex2008-04-02 08:00:46.0 +1000
@@ -2777,7 +2777,7 @@
We can also compute the above power in some of the computer
algebra systems that \sage includes. In each case we execute
On Apr 1, 2008, at 2:08 PM, Gary Furnish wrote:
Why not use import sage.rings.integer_ring as module_integer_ring.
If the location changes, just change what it is imported as.
I think the point is that re-arranging the rings directory should
have minimal impact outside of it. This is one
I think it is entirely possible that fixing import problems may have to come
at the expense of ease of use. I don't see rings.basic helping much. I
envision grand discussions about what constitutes a basic ring and what
should and should not be included. What happens if we still have issues
--- doc-main-2.11.0/ref/libs.tex2008-03-31 13:11:51.0 +1000
+++ doc-main-2.11.1/ref/libs.tex2008-04-02 08:23:12.0 +1000
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
The interfaces are implemented via shared libraries and data is moved
between systems purely in memory. In particular, there
--- doc-main-2.11.0/ref/networking.tex 2008-03-31 13:11:51.0 +1000
+++ doc-main-2.11.1/ref/networking.tex 2008-04-02 08:24:06.0 +1000
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
mature, fast, and offers a vast range of networking functionality.
The SAGE Notebook (see Chapter~\ref{ch:notebook})
-is
--- doc-main-2.11.0/doc/doc.tex 2008-03-31 13:11:51.0 +1000
+++ doc-main-2.11.1/doc/doc.tex 2008-04-02 08:43:35.0 +1000
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@
\LaTeX{} provides a variety of environments even without the
additional markup provided by the Python-specific document classes
-
--- doc-main-2.11.0/inst/inst.tex 2008-03-31 13:11:51.0 +1000
+++ doc-main-2.11.1/inst/inst.tex 2008-04-02 08:51:30.0 +1000
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@
Complete compilation of \SAGE is currently not supported on Solaris
or *BSD. It is possible to compile most of \SAGE
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Michael Brickenstein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Suprise, there exists a tutorial for PolyBoRi.
http://polybori.sourceforge.net/doc/tutorial/index.html
It is available in tex-format under
doc/tutorial/tutorial.tex
in our source distribution.
Hello,
On sci.math.symbolic, I saw that Roman Pearce posted some benchmarks
from his closed source library for performing sparse multivariate
polynomial arithmetic, which can be found at
http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/~rpearcea/ . The benchmarks (
Excellent stuff! Please post videos of all of the lectures.
But, Will, if that is you giving the lecture you need to increase your
lean body mass! More muscle = more math.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
Jason Grout wrote:
CCing sage-devel since this has turned into a devel discussion. The
original thread is on sage-support.
Joel B. Mohler wrote:
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 05:20:47 pm Joel B. Mohler wrote:
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 04:45:16 pm alex clemesha wrote:
With respect to the
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 at 06:04PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
This is video from lecture one of my Sage course
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-826792746508034hl=en
Check out the related videos that show up:
http://math.kaist.ac.kr/~drake/img/videos-related-to-sage.png
It must have
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Grout wrote:
CCing sage-devel since this has turned into a devel discussion. The
original thread is on sage-support.
Joel B. Mohler wrote:
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 05:20:47 pm Joel B. Mohler wrote:
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Thanks for your input. We are considering a more advanced model
(David Roe has lots of ideas on this front), but this falls outside
of the central focus coercion scheme. (This is one reason to use
_repr_ rather than the Python __repr__ so that the base object's
On Apr 1, 2008, at 2:03 PM, John Cremona wrote:
On 01/04/2008, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. We're making good progress on the new coercion model (David Roe
and I were working on it last night, he finished Rings), but it is
not 3.0 material (both for timing and stability
I'm trying to add _fast_float_ functionality to SymbolicEquation
objects. However, a perusal of the sage.ext.fast_eval.pyx file seems to
indicate that the operations , =, ==, =, , and != are not supported
by the fast_float machinery. Is that correct? If so, how do I add
these operations?
Hi William!
It is pure latex (I have chosen this format, as I wanted to reuse it
at some day for SAGE).
Michael
On 1 Apr., 23:53, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Michael Brickenstein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Suprise, there exists a
Hi!
Without saying anything about the quality of Romans work (I can't
judge that without a deeper look):
I don't find it very impressive, posting some benchmark for just one
example.
Note, that the example is dense.
If he is using fast (Strassen-like) algorithms, then it is quite
natural, to
63 matches
Mail list logo
