On Jun 8, 1:57 pm, Mats [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
I just installed a package using easy_install. I can import said
package in a python interactive shell, but I cannot import the package
in sage. Closer inspection reveals that:
import sys
print sys.path # -- FYI, sys.path is
On Jun 8, 10:59 pm, Dr. David Kirkby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Dave,
Is there a general policy on whether compiler flags should give the
best performance on a particular machine, or should the binaries work
on any similar system? I can see advantages in each.
Right now we pick up SSE2
On Jun 8, 11:05 pm, Alexander Dreyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
3) Next failure is polybori-0.3.1.p3
Michael suggested the change:
#!bin/sh - #!/usr/bin/env bash
but that does NOT work for me. Numerous errors still appear but they
are in C++ code and I don't know C++. I hope
On Jun 9, 9:09 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 8, 10:59 pm, Dr. David Kirkby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Dave,
Is there a general policy on whether compiler flags should give the
best performance on a particular machine, or should the binaries work
on any similar system? I
I would prefer to submit the bug as a Trac issue, but was not able to
subscribe.
Steps to reproduce the problem:
1.) download and install SAGE to a 32bit (P4) Ubuntu 8.04
2.) wget http://www.sagemath.org/packages/experimental/PIL-1.1.5.spkg
3.) ./sage -i PIL-1.1.5.spkg
4.) check the first
CCing to sage-devel, could be interesting for Gary's symbolic code
speed comparisons.
Ondrej
On Jun 9, 9:18 am, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Pearu Peterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Just a quick note that could be relevant to the
I tried to do sudo easy_install feedparser, which worked. I can
import feedparser from the python shell, but not from sage unless I
explicitly add it to my path.
I also did exactly as you did and compared the paths; as per request:
sage: import sys
sage: sys.path
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Mats [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to do sudo easy_install feedparser, which worked. I can
import feedparser from the python shell, but not from sage unless I
explicitly add it to my path.
You might want to try:
(1) Download feedparser from here:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:46 AM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Mats [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to do sudo easy_install feedparser, which worked. I can
import feedparser from the python shell, but not from sage unless I
explicitly add it to my
Hi,
So we're going to switch lite.sagemath.org to be the official
sage website soon. Could you take a quick glance at it
and see if there is anything that is *horribly totally wrong*
in your humble opinion. If not, we'll be good to go.
I'm not trying to solicit little nitpicks with this email,
Has anyone yet tested to see how well the new site mirrors?
I haven't looked at the source html but just just ask since I think
10 or so non-functioning mirrors would be a bad thing.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:25 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
So we're going to switch
On Jun 9, 9:42 am, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone yet tested to see how well the new site mirrors?
I haven't looked at the source html but just just ask since I think
10 or so non-functioning mirrors would be a bad thing.
Hi,
I think this is a definite issue since it
On page http://lite.sagemath.org/development.html at the bottom it
looks to me as if the meter diagram is saying that the quality of Sage
is 51.5%. I know that this page is for developers but if more
casual enquirers look here they might get the impression that only
51.5% of the code is tested.
I tried to do sudo easy_install feedparser, which worked. I can
import feedparser from the python shell, but not from sage unless I
explicitly add it to my path.
As sys.path shows by sudoing you are installing into the system wide
python. As William has pointed out that is not the way to
On 9-Jun-08, at 9:25 AM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
So we're going to switch lite.sagemath.org to be the official
sage website soon. Could you take a quick glance at it
and see if there is anything that is *horribly totally wrong*
in your humble opinion.
Do broken links count? From
On Jun 9, 2:43 am, IzI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would prefer to submit the bug as a Trac issue, but was not able to
subscribe.
Steps to reproduce the problem:
1.) download and install SAGE to a 32bit (P4) Ubuntu 8.04
2.)
Hi,
This is on an 8-core 2GHz xeon running debian. (Tom Boothby's machine.)
In a clean build of sage-3.0.2:
sage: time x = bernoulli(4)
CPU times: user 4.19 s, sys: 0.01 s, total: 4.20 s
Wall time: 4.20 s
sage: time x = bernoulli(4)
CPU times: user 3.18 s, sys: 0.01 s, total: 3.18 s
On Jun 9, 1:45 am, Dr. David Kirkby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 9, 9:09 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 8, 10:59 pm, Dr. David Kirkby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Dave,
Is there a general policy on whether compiler flags should give the
best performance on a
On Jun 9, 6:42 pm, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone yet tested to see how well the new site mirrors?
I should comment out the mirror thing until it is populated
everywhere. Then add only those which work!
H
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this
Horribly wrong: each page's title seems to be the same because the
part that is on each one is so long, Sage Open Source Mathematics
Software. Please, pretty please put the name of the page first or
shorten the Sage Open ... blah part to say Sage. I have 5 tabs open
right now and I'm not sure
FYI, when I computed bernoulli(10^7+4), I did so from sage -gp -- not from the
sage interface to gp.
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, David Harvey wrote:
Hi,
This is on an 8-core 2GHz xeon running debian. (Tom Boothby's machine.)
In a clean build of sage-3.0.2:
sage: time x = bernoulli(4)
CPU
On Jun 9, 6:51 pm, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On pagehttp://lite.sagemath.org/development.htmlat the bottom it
looks to me as if the meter diagram is saying that the quality of Sage
is 51.5%. ...
This section is something that must be exapanded in the near future -
e.g. I want
On Jun 9, 2008, at 1:19 PM, mabshoff wrote:
On Jun 9, 10:05 am, David Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi David,
This is on an 8-core 2GHz xeon running debian. (Tom Boothby's
machine.)
In a clean build of sage-3.0.2:
sage: time x = bernoulli(4)
CPU times: user 4.19 s,
Why are sage developers missing from
http://lite.sagemath.org/development-ack.html ? Oh I see.. they're on
the dev map. Could there be an explicit link to this page from
http://lite.sagemath.org/development-ack.html ?
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:25 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Jun 6, 2008, at 10:00 AM, John Cremona wrote:
2008/6/6 Nick Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This thread got slightly off topic to the original question though:
where should sqrt(2) belong? Z[sqrt(2)], SR, or somewhere else?
I always want my data to start as close to the initial object as
On Jun 9, 9:23 am, Dr. David Kirkby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The R manual says R fails tests if built with gcc 4 (where 4.00 or 4.x
is not specified) on Solaris x86. I will try a build on Solaris x86 as
some time with both Forge and gcc, but not today.
Dave
The official source of R (ver
On Jun 9, 6:15 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As is I tested R 2.6.1 on OSX, Linux and Solaris and the test suite
failed on every platform I tested. You can draw your own conclusion
what I called R afterwards. There is already a ticket for that and I
hope that the 2.7 upgrade will fix
there is no link to Standard and Optional Packages
http://www.sagemath.org/packages.html
Iztok
On Jun 9, 6:25 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
So we're going to switch lite.sagemath.org to be the official
sage website soon. Could you take a quick glance at it
and see if
I will post the log tomorrow (I used a borrowed PC with P4 and Ubuntu
8.04 for a trial installation), so I will try to write some other
details today.
The bug is not related to the PIL package, it was used only as an
example for repeating the bug.
I got the same error (limits.h line 122) while
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 10:19 -0700, mabshoff wrote:
[...]
No clue. Can you actually compare the gp binary from Sage directly
with the timings from your self builid binary to eliminate the problem
that libPari is involved here? If the gp binary in Sage is slower by a
factor of three compared
On Jun 9, 2008, at 5:17 PM, Jonathan Bober wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 10:19 -0700, mabshoff wrote:
[...]
No clue. Can you actually compare the gp binary from Sage directly
with the timings from your self builid binary to eliminate the
problem
that libPari is involved here? If the gp
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 2:27 PM, David Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jun 9, 2008, at 5:17 PM, Jonathan Bober wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 10:19 -0700, mabshoff wrote:
[...]
No clue. Can you actually compare the gp binary from Sage directly
with the timings from your self
On Jun 9, 2008, at 5:35 PM, Michael Abshoff wrote:
I wonder if we are just building GMP incorrectly. That bernfrac()
routine should depend mainly on the speed of long integer
multiplication and division. I am not a GP expert --- how does one
generate large random integers in GP? I could try
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 2:43 PM, David Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 9, 2008, at 5:35 PM, Michael Abshoff wrote:
I wonder if we are just building GMP incorrectly. That bernfrac()
routine should depend mainly on the speed of long integer
multiplication and division. I am not a GP
Hi,
I have been revisiting some process control code in Knoboo, and
realized
how well Sage responds to SIG-INT compared to standard Python. It
basically
works too good... ;)
Can somebody point me to the most relevant pieces of code/
documentation
concerning signal handling in Sage so I can learn
Doesn't gmp 4.2.1 build on cygwin? Do you happen to recall what the
issues were, as it'll be a problem for mpir too (though I did manage
one build on cygwin already).
Bill.
On 9 Jun, 22:58, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 2:43 PM, David Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Bill,
On Jun 9, 3:07 pm, Bill Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't gmp 4.2.1 build on cygwin? Do you happen to recall what the
issues were, as it'll be a problem for mpir too (though I did manage
one build on cygwin already).
Bill.
At some point after a recent Cygwin update gmp 4.2.1
On Jun 9, 2008, at 5:17 PM, Jonathan Bober wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 10:19 -0700, mabshoff wrote:
[...]
No clue. Can you actually compare the gp binary from Sage directly
with the timings from your self builid binary to eliminate the
problem
that libPari is involved here? If the gp
On Jun 9, 3:20 pm, David Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 9, 2008, at 5:17 PM, Jonathan Bober wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 10:19 -0700, mabshoff wrote:
[...]
No clue. Can you actually compare the gp binary from Sage directly
with the timings from your self builid binary to
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have been revisiting some process control code in Knoboo, and
realized
how well Sage responds to SIG-INT compared to standard Python. It
basically
works too good... ;)
Could you please make this question much
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:31 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 9, 3:20 pm, David Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 9, 2008, at 5:17 PM, Jonathan Bober wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 10:19 -0700, mabshoff wrote:
[...]
No clue. Can you actually compare the gp binary
In knoboo.kernel.engine.server.py, the method serve_forever has an exception
handler for KeyboardInterrupt; this is to prevent the server from being
shutdown by accident.
When the interrupt button in the notebook is pressed,
knoboo.kernel.process.EngineProcessControl sends INT signals to the
Hello folks,
I *just* replaced the current SSL certificate of www.sagenb.com that
was only valid for another couple weeks with one that expires five
years from now. So your browser will likely complain about the new
certificate, but that is expected If you are using a FireFox 3 based
browser you
I think the person involved with coordinating the
modular q-expansion code is William Stein himself,
so I'm cc'ing the sage-devel list for others interested
in this info. My guess is that, if William doesn't
know about this Pari code already then he will want
to know what license it is released
On Jun 9, 2008, at 5:58 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 2:43 PM, David Harvey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 9, 2008, at 5:35 PM, Michael Abshoff wrote:
I wonder if we are just building GMP incorrectly. That bernfrac()
routine should depend mainly on the speed of long
On Jun 9, 7:01 pm, David Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 9, 2008, at 5:58 PM, William Stein wrote:
SNIP
The last version, so that we could build on cygwin, and also it was
needed
for OS X 10.5 64-bit. We will switch to mpir soon, as soon as
there is a
release :-)
46 matches
Mail list logo
