On Jun 24, 2009, at 1:57 AM, Maurizio wrote:
I agree. We could do something like plotting all the deltas with a
stem plot and then superimposing the rest of the plot
Maurizio
It might give the wrong impression.
On 24 Giu, 04:21, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
One way would be
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Mike Hansen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
exp(-x^i).integral(x,0,1) returns
Traceback (click to the left for traceback)
...
Is %i an integer?
Ouch!
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:01:58AM -0400, David Roe wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:29:34AM +0200, Franco Saliola wrote:
I'm also in favor of _test_X to avoid cluttering up the tab
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Nicolas M.
Thierynicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:01:58AM -0400, David Roe wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:29:34AM +0200, Franco Saliola
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:49:20AM +0200, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Nicolas M.
Thierynicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:01:58AM -0400, David Roe wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Nicolas M.
Thierynicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:49:20AM +0200, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Nicolas M.
Thierynicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:01:58AM -0400, David Roe wrote:
This is the first release of the new cycle, and I've agreed to step in
and co-chair the release with Tom. The source tarball and sage.math
binary are available:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.alpha0.tar
2009/6/24 Robert Miller rlmills...@gmail.com:
6196 mpmath support
5481 devel/doc/output/* should be filtered from the list of files to doctest
6276 atlas-3.8.3.p2 dumps core on Solaris 10 with gcc 4.4.0
4712 Make the doctest timeouts in Sage easily adjustable
5517 cvxopt-0.9.p7: build failure
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Robert Millerrlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first release of the new cycle, and I've agreed to step in
and co-chair the release with Tom. The source tarball and sage.math
binary are available:
The source tarball and sage.math
binary are available:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.alpha0.tarhttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.alpha0-s...
If you are involved with one of them, you
are encouraged to try applying the patches to
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I think we should really make some effort to improve our page on Wikipedia.
Comparing the Sage and Mathematica pages on Wikipedia shows the
Mathematica one is much nicer. Would it not be sensible to put some
* Solvers for systems of equations, ODEs, PDEs, DAEs, DDEs and
recurrence relations
no clue
perhaps desolve and friends?
* Numeric and symbolic tools for discrete and continuous calculus
yes. I don't know what discrete calculus means.
Probably this means difference
I think Sage does have at least one mathematical database (in fact
more than one...) !
John
2009/6/24 kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com:
* Solvers for systems of equations, ODEs, PDEs, DAEs, DDEs and
recurrence relations
no clue
perhaps desolve and friends?
* Numeric and symbolic
Hi
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Burcin Erocalbur...@erocal.org wrote:
If there are no objections to the above definition of hybrid approach,
the options for default printing are:
1) Mathematica style
2) Maple style
3) hybrid
I still vote for 1, MMA style. To state the reasons again,
Burcin Erocal wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:42:46 -0300
Golam Mortuza Hossain gmhoss...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:20 PM, kcrismankcris...@gmail.com wrote:
So the conclusion is that we will go with the Mathematica style
notation.
Does that also apply to Golam's
Robert Miller wrote:
Other easy ways to save release managers time, resulting in more
frequent releases and shorter wait times to get your code merged:
* Please include the trac number in each commit message if possible.
Surely this could be scripted? Just prepend a Trac #: to the
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Robert Miller wrote:
Other easy ways to save release managers time, resulting in more
frequent releases and shorter wait times to get your code merged:
* Please include the trac number in each commit message if
Each of the following tickets were rejected by the merge scripts, but
unfortunately the failures are not available at this time (this is due
to human error on my part). If you are involved with one of them, you
are encouraged to try applying the patches to 4.1.alpha0 and see why/
if they
2009/6/24 Robert Miller rlmills...@gmail.com:
This is the first release of the new cycle, and I've agreed to step in
and co-chair the release with Tom. The source tarball and sage.math
binary are available:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.alpha0.tar
Test(obj) returns something that provides all kinds of functionality
and methods for testing said object. This can call certain _ methods
on obj.
+1 to this, -1 to lazy attributes, properties, etc.
Nick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email
I am accumulating a large number of small text files in /tmp, for example
j...@host-57-44%cat /tmp/fileqibSwS
cpu MHz : 2800.113
cpu MHz : 2800.113
cpu MHz : 2800.113
cpu MHz : 2800.113
and
j...@host-57-44%cat filekswTqv
make[2]: Entering directory
On Jun 23, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I think we should really make some effort to improve our page on
Wikipedia.
I'll second this. Wikipedia is the highest source of traffic for
Cython after google and people typing in cython.org directly (despite
an only average
+1 for the MMA style.
I am +1 for mathematica style, but can someone explain why
In[5]:= D[F[x+2*y], x, x]
Out[5]= F''[x + 2 y]
Why is x somehow considered special and y not?
Nick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
On Jun 24, 2009, at 12:52 AM, William Stein wrote:
But, err, guys, are you telling *me* that you want an
attribute here
instead of a method? Or should this be:
One new attribute in tab completion is fine. A dozen, not so much. I
still like the approach below better though.
I
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Robert
Bradshawrober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Jun 24, 2009, at 12:52 AM, William Stein wrote:
But, err, guys, are you telling *me* that you want an
attribute here
instead of a method? Or should this be:
One new attribute in tab completion
On Jun 23, 2009, at 4:24 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
Indeed. The current trac naming convention really strongly
encouraged
you to do the right thing, which is to always open a trac ticket
for
whatever you're working on.
Definitely. That also why I 100% support having the ticket
2009/6/24 Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com:
+1 for the MMA style.
I am +1 for mathematica style, but can someone explain why
In[5]:= D[F[x+2*y], x, x]
Out[5]= F''[x + 2 y]
Why is x somehow considered special and y not?
F is a function of one variable. F'' is its second
I used to include a commit message when I did not use MQs. With MQs I
make the patch using sage -hg export qtip blah.patch and do not
get prompted for a commit message. Thelast one I did then ended up
with [mq]: intpts where the commit message would be, so perhaps that
is the commit
On Jun 24, 6:16 pm, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
I'll second this. Wikipedia is the highest source of traffic for
Cython after google and people typing in cython.org directly (despite
an only average page)--I wouldn't be surprised if it accounts for a
significant
I think the following is a counterexample to The trac_ prefix does
not bring any useful information.
I still think it's not really, and it is just making the name longer,
but I don't really care either.
I don't see the use for it either, but it's not a huge issue for me.
I want to weigh
On 24-Jun-09, at 9:42 AM, John Cremona wrote:
2009/6/24 Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com:
+1 for the MMA style.
I am +1 for mathematica style, but can someone explain why
In[5]:= D[F[x+2*y], x, x]
Out[5]= F''[x + 2 y]
Why is x somehow considered special and y not?
F is a
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I think we should really make some effort to improve our page on Wikipedia.
OK, based on some input from others, and what I found with Google, I
have revised the 'Features* section somewhat (and only the Features to
date).
The current page is here (this might include
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Craig Citrocraigci...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the following is a counterexample to The trac_ prefix does
not bring any useful information.
I still think it's not really, and it is just making the name longer,
but I don't really care either.
I don't see
2009/6/24 Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I think we should really make some effort to improve our page on Wikipedia.
OK, based on some input from others, and what I found with Google, I
have revised the 'Features* section somewhat (and only the Features
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Nick Alexanderncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
Put 'em in a folder, then -- trac/* will pick 'em up. Having tickets
start with a repo name would vastly improve the automerge experience.
+1 to repo_num_desc.patch
Can repo be optional and default to devel/sage?
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Tom Boothbytomas.boot...@gmail.com wrote:
Each of the following tickets were rejected by the merge scripts, but
unfortunately the failures are not available at this time (this is due
to human error on my part). If you are involved with one of them, you
are
6196
5991
6164
6200
6269
I'm generating reports on these right now and posting them to tickets
as they come.
Ah -- and 6269 almost certainly failed because I applied both patches
on the ticket, not because the second patch was actually bad.
A related page to look at would be
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_computer_algebra_systems
Note that Mma is declared there to be ubiquitous while Maple only
notes its libraries' sources are viewable. Our friends at Axiom even
link from there to a video!
- kcrisman
2009/6/24 Tom Boothby tomas.boot...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Nick Alexanderncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
Put 'em in a folder, then -- trac/* will pick 'em up. Having tickets
start with a repo name would vastly improve the automerge experience.
I put mine in a folder
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 09:52:51AM +0200, William Stein wrote:
One thing I am not very keen on is that to get the list of available
tests, one need to do:
sage: t = Test(foo)
sage: t.asstab
But I guess I can live with that (in practice, I myself will be using
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Nicolas M.
Thierynicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 09:52:51AM +0200, William Stein wrote:
One thing I am not very keen on is that to get the list of available
tests, one need to do:
sage: t = Test(foo)
sage:
I think the following is a counterexample to The trac_ prefix does
not bring any useful information.
I still think it's not really, and it is just making the name longer,
but I don't really care either.
I don't see the use for it either, but it's not a huge issue for me.
I should
On Jun 24, 10:34 pm, Robert Miller rlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
I really like having the ticket number first, it makes it easy to see
(given an ordered list of patches) what patches belong as part of a
single ticket. E.g.
6201-heegner.patch
6201-referee-fixes.patch
...
+1
Another point to make is a video I saw recently by the SVN guys, who
claimed that the amount of discussion which centers around a decision
is inversely proportional to how important it is. They related a story
where the project nearly forked and many feelings were hurt over
something ten
Robert Miller wrote:
I think the following is a counterexample to The trac_ prefix does
not bring any useful information.
I still think it's not really, and it is just making the name longer,
but I don't really care either.
I don't see the use for it either, but it's not a huge issue for me.
kcrisman wrote:
A related page to look at would be
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_computer_algebra_systems
Note that Mma is declared there to be ubiquitous while Maple only
notes its libraries' sources are viewable. Our friends at Axiom even
link from there to a video!
-
Hi Golam,
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:58:19 -0300
Golam Mortuza Hossain gmhoss...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Burcin Erocalbur...@erocal.org
wrote:
If there are no objections to the above definition of hybrid
approach, the options for default printing are:
1)
On Jun 24, 5:04 am, Robert Miller rlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/graphs/graph.py # 25 doctests
failed
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/databases/database.py # 20
doctests failed
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/geometry/polyhedra.py # 1
doctests
As reported before, ATLAS fails to build on Solaris if the Sun linker is
used, since the flags in one of the makefiles are GNU-specific.
The patch applies 'sed' a few times to substitute the GNU flags to the
Sun flags:
-shared == -G
-soname == -h
--whole-archive == -z allextract
Hi folks,
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Robert Millerrlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first release of the new cycle, and I've agreed to step in
and co-chair the release with Tom. The source tarball and sage.math
binary are available:
SNIP
Here are the tickets merged in Sage
William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Nicolas M.
Thierynicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 09:52:51AM +0200, William Stein wrote:
One thing I am not very keen on is that to get the list of available
tests, one need to do:
sage: t = Test(foo)
Robert Miller wrote:
This is the first release of the new cycle, and I've agreed to step in
and co-chair the release with Tom. The source tarball and sage.math
binary are available:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.alpha0.tar
Robert Miller wrote:
I think the following is a counterexample to The trac_ prefix does
not bring any useful information.
I still think it's not really, and it is just making the name longer,
but I don't really care either.
I don't see the use for it either, but it's not a huge issue for me.
William Stein wrote:
* Constrained and unconstrained local and global optimization
Yes, in scipy. See http://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/optimize.html
* Support for complex number, arbitrary precision and symbolic
computation for all functions
all functions? yeah
William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com
wrote:
Robert Miller wrote:
Other easy ways to save release managers time, resulting in more
frequent releases and shorter wait times to get your code merged:
* Please include the trac number in
On Jun 23, 2009, at 4:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
From the top README.txt
---
NOT SUPPORTED:
* FreeBSD
* Arch Linux
* Gentoo Linux
* Microsoft Windows (via Visual Studio C++)
* Microsoft Windows (via
On Jun 24, 2009, at 8:15 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Jason Groutjason-
s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Robert Miller wrote:
Other easy ways to save release managers time, resulting in more
frequent releases and shorter wait times to get your
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Robert Miller wrote:
This is the first release of the new cycle, and I've agreed to step in
and co-chair the release with Tom. The source tarball and sage.math
binary are available:
58 matches
Mail list logo
