[sage-devel] Re: sage-4.1.alpha3

2009-07-03 Thread Rob Beezer
From source on 64-bit Kubuntu 9.04 on Intel Core Duo: sage -t devel/sage/doc/fr/tutorial/programming.rst # 1 doctests failed sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/darwin_utilities.pyx # 3 doctests failed --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to

[sage-devel] Re: sage-4.1.alpha3

2009-07-03 Thread John Cremona
2009/7/2 Robert Miller rlmills...@gmail.com: but on 32-bit ubuntu I also get this in the file where a previous failure was fixed by the merged patch at #6446:         sage -t  devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph_plot.py On reattempt this did pass, but it is a little worrying. What was the

[sage-devel] sage -merge problem

2009-07-03 Thread John Cremona
On a fresh clone of a freshly-built 4.1.alpha3: j...@host-57-44%sage -merge File /home/jec/sage-4.1.alpha3/local/bin/sage-apply-ticket, line 464 os.chdir(SAGE_ROOT+'/tmp) ^ SyntaxError: EOL while scanning string literal Should there be a second quote before the

[sage-devel] Re: sage -merge problem

2009-07-03 Thread davidloeffler
I got the same thing; and when I added a single quote in the obvious place, I got a new error: Traceback (most recent call last): File /home/david/sage-4.1/local/bin/sage-apply-ticket, line 20, in module import sage.misc.hg as hg File

[sage-devel] Re: sage -merge problem

2009-07-03 Thread John Cremona
2009/7/3 davidloeffler dave.loeff...@gmail.com: I got the same thing; and when I added a single quote in the obvious place, I got a new error: I have seen that one. Try running it again *not* from inside SAGE_ROOT/devel . John Traceback (most recent call last): File

[sage-devel] Re: D, diff derivative conversion and _maxima_init_ bug

2009-07-03 Thread Golam Mortuza Hossain
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Robert Bradshawrober...@math.washington.edu wrote: I thought the consensus was that the D[n], though more powerful, was far less intuitive and so we were going to go with diff(f(x,y), x) or even (df/dx)(x,y) for printing. No. If I gather properly, the

[sage-devel] Re: sage-4.1.alpha3

2009-07-03 Thread David Joyner
I got the same as Marshall (same machine+OS) but with one addition: The following tests failed: sage -t devel/sage/doc/en/a_tour_of_sage/index.rst sage -t devel/sage/doc/fr/tutorial/programming.rst sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/darwin_utilities.pyx sage -t

[sage-devel] Re: Linear Programming and MIP... Let's start something huge !

2009-07-03 Thread Nathann Cohen
Hmmm... I began to write the interface to CBC to notice that the libraries was writtten in C++ and that I needed to wrap C++ classes into Cython, which I do not know how to do ... I read several manuals and end up with compilation failures I do not know how to fix : sage: execfile(setup.py)

[sage-devel] Re: Linear Programming and MIP... Let's start something huge !

2009-07-03 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Nathann Cohennathann.co...@gmail.com wrote: Hmmm... I began to write the interface to CBC to notice that the libraries was writtten in C++ and that I needed to wrap C++ classes into Cython, which I do not know how to do ... I read several manuals and end up

[sage-devel] Re: D, diff derivative conversion and _maxima_init_ bug

2009-07-03 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Golam Mortuza Hossaingmhoss...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Robert Bradshawrober...@math.washington.edu wrote: I thought the consensus was that the D[n], though more powerful, was far less intuitive and so we were going to go with

[sage-devel] Re: D, diff derivative conversion and _maxima_init_ bug

2009-07-03 Thread Golam Mortuza Hossain
Hi, On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:01 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Golam Mortuza Hossaingmhoss...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Robert Bradshawrober...@math.washington.edu wrote: I thought the consensus was that the D[n], though

[sage-devel] Re: tinymce

2009-07-03 Thread William Stein
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Pat LeSmitheqed...@gmail.com wrote: William Stein wrote: What about control-enter?   Can you make it so   control-enter = linebreak   shift-enter = submit ? Control-enter is bound to spliteval_cell.  To make control-shift-enter, say, insert a line break,

[sage-devel] Unpickling problem

2009-07-03 Thread daveloeffler
I'm having trouble with unpickling some elements of an order in a quadratic number field. If I do sage: L = QuadraticField(-11,'a'); OL = L.maximal_order(); w = OL.0 sage: loads(dumps(w)) then I get a traceback ending with AttributeError: 'AbsoluteOrder' object has no attribute '_is_maximal'

[sage-devel] [Fwd: A variation on Rado's graph editor]

2009-07-03 Thread Pat LeSmithe
I'm still reading through the replies to my off-list message, which I've included below. They're provoking much thought! Please let me know if it's OK to post them here, too, or feel free to bring them into the light... Original Message Subject: A variation on Rado's graph

[sage-devel] Re: [Fwd: A variation on Rado's graph editor]

2009-07-03 Thread Rob Beezer
(my reply off-list) This is very promising! This all worked very smoothly on my machine, the window-in-a-window and the graph editor itself. I'm on just Firefox 3.0.11. I don't see anything in the Sage output or Latex output tabs, but maybe I'm not suppose to? To the right of the tabs I have

[sage-devel] Re: video for sage days 16

2009-07-03 Thread Rob Beezer
On Jul 2, 10:47 pm, Dan Drake dr...@kaist.edu wrote: Have you seen the video stuff in Firefox 3.5? OK, that's enough prompting to give it a whirl. Very nice. To be relieved of any dependence on Flash would be very welcome. I wonder if IE and friends will follow Firefox's lead on native

[sage-devel] Re: video for sage days 16

2009-07-03 Thread Tim Lahey
On Jul 3, 2009, at 1:58 PM, Rob Beezer wrote: On Jul 2, 10:47 pm, Dan Drake dr...@kaist.edu wrote: Have you seen the video stuff in Firefox 3.5? OK, that's enough prompting to give it a whirl. Very nice. To be relieved of any dependence on Flash would be very welcome. I wonder if IE

[sage-devel] Re: wysiwyg mathematics

2009-07-03 Thread Rob Beezer
On Jul 2, 8:08 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: No.  This can and will work fine.  In fact it already *does* with interact.  Here's a tutorial: Hi William, Thanks for the tutorial - I'll play with that idea some. Once I wrap my head around the other ideas and approaches being

[sage-devel] Re: [Fwd: A variation on Rado's graph editor]

2009-07-03 Thread Jason Grout
Pat LeSmithe wrote: I'm still reading through the replies to my off-list message, which I've included below. They're provoking much thought! Please let me know if it's OK to post them here, too, or feel free to bring them into the light... Original Message Subject: A

[sage-devel] Re: sage-4.1.alpha3

2009-07-03 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Jul 2, 2009, at 10:29 , Robert Miller wrote: Source tarball: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/ sage-4.1.alpha3.tar sage.math binary: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.alpha3-sage.math-only-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz Upgrade URL:

[sage-devel] t2 - its back up, but will go down in a couple of days.

2009-07-03 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
I took t2 down for maintenance today. I decided it was safer to do a full upgrade to Solaris 10 update 7, as despite a longer and more complex procedure than applying patches, it is actually less risky. since I'm located 3700 miles away from 't2', I obviously want the safest option.

[sage-devel] Re: [Fwd: A variation on Rado's graph editor]

2009-07-03 Thread Pat LeSmithe
Jason Grout wrote: I envision the sage code cells having javascript plugins. A plugin would be a javascript object or something that, given a piece of sage code, could return an html widget that represents that sage code in some nice, possibly interactive way, and could be queried for a