Hi Vincent,
1) I find the actual __repr__ boring (Ferrers diagram). Why do not
keep the old list representations which is really clearer than lines
of sharps ? Is there a reason to prefer Ferrer diagrams than list of
integers ?
A very good one: my current research problem ;-) it
These tickets have patches awaiting review. After applying the
relevant patches at those tickets and rebuilding the whole Sage
standard documentation, you would get something like what is available
at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/8470-newdoc/
The tutorials all look pretty good.
Oh, but Florent, I think I agree with Vincent that the list of
decreasing numbers is better as the default representation. For example
now:
sage: p = SFAPower(QQ)
sage: h = SFAHomogeneous(QQ)
sage: h(p[3])
h#
#
# - 3*h##
# + 3*h###
which is not very readable!
If one can use your
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 07:38:48PM +1100, Minh Nguyen wrote:
and hit the enter key to read the group theory tutorial from the
command line, or do the same thing from within the notebook interface.
I tried to achieve this, but failed. Here is what happened. To do
Thanks for investigating this!
Hi Nicolas,
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
SNIP
For the first one, __init__ import's primer. For the second, I set
the __doc__ entry.
Yes, that trick of yours is certainly better than hacking sage/all.py.
One problem down, one to go. I
Hello all,
I'm looking over #8486 and the patch there tests to see if the xelatex
program is available with
os.system('which xelatex /dev/null')
Now, the Python documentation says one should use the subprocess module
instead of os.system [1], and also I recall that apparently the which
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Dan Drake dr...@kaist.edu wrote:
I'm looking over #8486 and the patch there tests to see if the xelatex
program is available with
os.system('which xelatex /dev/null')
See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8474 which was just merged :-)
--Mike
--
Hi guys and gals,
Currently I'm attempting to fit the following data to the general
logistic model:
[(0,0),(1,0),(2,13),(3,28),(4,48),(5,89),(6,107),(7,168),(8,188),(9,209)]
The form of the logistic curve I am using is:
K/(1 + a*exp(r * (t - t0)))^(1/v)
with K,a,r,t0 and v being parameters, t
Hi folks,
I thought I should provide an update about my proposal [1] to include
the following in the Sage standard documentation:
* FAQ
* Python Functional Programming for Mathematicians
* Sage and Coding Theory
* Sage and Cython: A Brief Introduction
* Linear Programming in Sage
* Group
Hi Dima,
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 4:11 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
Minh,
I wonder how one can contribute changes/patches to files in sage/doc/
en/constructions
I think you could just create a patch, like the way you do when you
create a patch for a new module in the Sage
Hi Dan,
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 08:42:59PM +0900, Dan Drake wrote:
I briefly looked at what you did, and it looks nice.
:-)
I'll integrate this into SageTeX, polish it up, and get a spkg
prepared as soon as I can.
Great, thanks!
Maybe the most important for us would be to get a
Mike Hansen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Dan Drake dr...@kaist.edu wrote:
I'm looking over #8486 and the patch there tests to see if the xelatex
program is available with
os.system('which xelatex /dev/null')
See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8474 which was just
Since Sage now (mostly) works on Solaris, I thought I'd try it on
my SB1500 running OpenSolaris with SunStudio.
Prerequisites:
- Install SUNWgmake and SUNWgtar
- ln -s /bin/gmake .../sage-.../local/bin/make
- ln -s /bin/gtar .../sage-.../local/bin/tar
(bash is already installed as /bin/sh)
This
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Since Sage now (mostly) works on Solaris, I thought I'd try it on
my SB1500 running OpenSolaris with SunStudio.
Prerequisites:
- Install SUNWgmake and SUNWgtar
- ln -s /bin/gmake .../sage-.../local/bin/make
- ln -s /bin/gtar .../sage-.../local/bin/tar
(bash is already
Yes, not only does 4.3.4.alpha1 build ok on Solaris 10 (SPARC), but it also
passes all the doctests, without any patches applied whatsoever.
Of course, it still fails the Mathematica test, and perhaps some of other
optional packages. But all the standard packages build, and all the standard
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 at 10:39AM +, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
* John Palmieri has written a library function for Sage, called
have_program() which determines if the program exists. It does not
report it's path, as John did not need that information, but only
whether it exists or not.
Hi Nicolas,
The list sage-nt was set up to have a lower volume and lower noise
forum
for sage-devel issues with mathematical (number theoretic) interest.
I also don't track sage-combinat for similar reasons as John, and
miss
most of what passes on sage-devel due to the high volume. Maybe
there
On 12 March 2010 14:01, David Kohel drko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
The list sage-nt was set up to have a lower volume and lower noise
forum
for sage-devel issues with mathematical (number theoretic) interest.
I also don't track sage-combinat for similar reasons as John, and
miss
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:14 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 March 2010 14:01, David Kohel drko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
The list sage-nt was set up to have a lower volume and lower noise
forum
for sage-devel issues with mathematical (number theoretic) interest.
Felix Lawrence wrote:
FullForm looks like a bit of a headache to me - in part one of the
examples given, InputForm gives Sqrt[5], whereas FullForm gives
Power[5,Rational[-1,2]]. The former is closer to sage's syntax and
should be easier to parse (and a basic parser for InputForm already
exists,
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, William Stein wrote:
We might make a PPA for Ubuntu. If someone is interested in an easy way to
install Sage via dpkg, that might be the best option at this point.
I agree that removing sage 3.0.5 (or whatever version it is) from Debian is
probably best, since our
On 12-Mar-10, at 12:22 AM, Joal Heagney wrote:
Hi guys and gals,
Currently I'm attempting to fit the following data to the general
logistic model:
[(0,0),(1,0),(2,13),(3,28),(4,48),(5,89),(6,107),(7,168),(8,188),
(9,209)]
The form of the logistic curve I am using is:
K/(1 + a*exp(r * (t -
On 12-Mar-10, at 6:14 AM, John Cremona wrote:
On 12 March 2010 14:01, David Kohel drko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
The list sage-nt was set up to have a lower volume and lower noise
forum
for sage-devel issues with mathematical (number theoretic) interest.
I also don't track
I guess that's about it:
sage: data = [(0,0),(1,0),(2,13),(3,28),(4,48),(5,89),(6,107),(7,168),
(8,188),(9,209)]
sage: var('K,a,r,t,t0,v')
(K, a, r, t, t0, v)
sage: model(t) = K/(1 + a*exp(r * (t - t0)))^(1/v)
sage: find_fit(data, model)
[K == 84.99972210745, a == 126.84970317061706, r ==
I've tried to install all the optional packages on Solaris 10 (SPARC) using
sage-4.3.4.alpha1.
I keep getting this error message.
sage: for X in optional_packages()[1]: install_package(X)
:
Force installing ace-5.0.p0
Calling sage-spkg on ace-5.0.p0
Warning: Attempted to overwrite
The group SL(2,3) has a method conjugacy_class_representatives()
while the group DiCyclicGroup(3) has a method
conjugacy_classes_representatives(). These names are similar but not
identical. Presumably one should be changed.
Dan
--
To post to this group, send an email to
On Mar 12, 10:01 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
I've tried to install all the optional packages on Solaris 10 (SPARC) using
sage-4.3.4.alpha1.
I keep getting this error message.
sage: for X in optional_packages()[1]: install_package(X)
:
Force installing
Hi Dan,
The distinction is one group is a matrix group and the other is a
permutation group.
sage/groups/matrix_gps/matrix_group.py
sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup.py
Presumably the method could be moved up the hierarchy a level. Can
you make a ticket, or should I add it to my queue?
I think I
Yay!
--Mike
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Presumably the method could be moved up the hierarchy a level. Can
you make a ticket, or should I add it to my queue?
I made a ticket: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8510
I think I like the singular. ;-)
Me too.
Dan
--
To post to this group, send an email to
It came to my attention a little while ago that Sage is applying to be
a Google Summer of Code mentoring organization, and soon after that I
discovered PYCA ( http://code.google.com/p/cellular-automata-sage-toolkit/
), a cellular automaton package written by Iztok Jeras which hasn't
seen very many
On 12-Mar-10, at 10:42 AM, Rob Beezer wrote:
Hi Dan,
The distinction is one group is a matrix group and the other is a
permutation group.
sage/groups/matrix_gps/matrix_group.py
sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup.py
Presumably the method could be moved up the hierarchy a level. Can
you make a
Hi Dan,
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 1:57 AM, bump b...@match.stanford.edu wrote:
SNIP
probably belongs only to the second tutorial on RSA. But
it is presented as a separate tutorial.
That bibliography is not intended to be a tutorial. It is intended to
be, well, a central place to collect
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 07:38:48PM +1100, Minh Nguyen wrote:
and hit the enter key to read the group theory tutorial from the
command line, or do the same thing from within the notebook interface.
I tried to achieve this, but failed. Here is what happened. To do
Thanks for investigating this!
Hi Nicolas,
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
SNIP
For the first one, __init__ import's primer. For the second, I set
the __doc__ entry.
Yes, that trick of yours is certainly better than hacking sage/all.py.
One problem down, one to go. I
Hi,
(This email got a bit long. See EXECUTIVE SUMMARY below for the
conclusion.)
There's a serious push to get Sage to work on Solaris and to keep it
working. This involves testing spkg's and at least lower-level patches
on Solaris to make sure nothing gets broken. We need to somehow
Hello, Sage developpers !
I created a ticket to correct some annoying problem about
documentation in graph theory
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8513
I can fix it myself, but I would like to have some opinions before
doing so. The question is, should we just add the reference to these
Hi Alex,
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:56 AM, ablondin
alexandre.blondin.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I can fix it myself, but I would like to have some opinions before
doing so.
See my comment at #8513.
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--
To post to this group, send an email to
On Mar 13, 2:41 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Felix Lawrence wrote:
But I've just noticed that mathematica doesn't seem to be responsible
for the weird orderings here after all - it seems to be sage itself.
For example:
sage: 4+I
I + 4
As Nick wrote some time
Yup, that's what I tried.
If you want, I can post the fmin alternative that I used instead. The
only issue is, that I had to use python functions for the model
equation, rather than a symbolic expression.
Joal Heagney
On Mar 13, 3:57 am, YannLC yannlaiglecha...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess that's
On Mar 12, 3:17 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
So the Mathematica *input* syntax is closer to the sage *input* syntax,
while the mathematica full form (i.e., the internal tree of operations)
is closer to the sage tree of operations. That makes a lot of sense.
For
Hi Alex,
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Building Sage on t2 takes a long time. It would be great to have a
t2.math binary available for each alpha/rc/final release of Sage, which
anyone can just grab and untar and start testing on *right away*.
On Mar 10, 3:09 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Yes, you heard right. Sage 4.3.4.alpha1 now builds on t2.math thanks
to the persistent hard work of David Kirkby.
I just tried to build this version of Sage on two of the Skynet
machines running Solaris, unsuccessfully,
43 matches
Mail list logo
