Hi John,
Extremely short answer (I must catch a train)...
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 09:46:54PM -0700, John H Palmieri wrote:
Some questions about defining an AlgebraWithBasis or a
GradedAlgebraWithBasis:
- Do these need to be defined using CombinatorialFreeModule, as in the
example?
No !
Hi John!
Again, I'll stick to a very short answer for the moment. Prompted by
your questions, I now have a clearer idea of what sort of wizard-like
document is needed by the developers when choosing the implementation
for a parent. I'll try to work on it this week, and keep you updated
On May 25, 12:46 am, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
Hi John!
Again, I'll stick to a very short answer for the moment. Prompted by
your questions, I now have a clearer idea of what sort of wizard-like
document is needed by the developers when choosing the
I would like to construct the set of ordered partitions of a positive
integer n subject to a condition like this:
- if the partition is (l_1, l_2, ...), then I want to specify a
variant of slope: I want to specify integers a and b, or lists of
integers (a_1, a_2, ...) and (b_1, b_2, ...) and
Ok, in case I get hit by lightning in the next twelve hours, I've at
least figured out what the bug is, but fixing it will take some
effort. Essentially, the bug is in double_coset.pyx, when we do the
first set of refinements to get the left partition stack and the first
partition stack set up.
When on builds 'sympow', a directory $SAGE_LOCAL/lib/sympow is made, and the
file 'sympow' executable copied there:
drkir...@hawk:~/sage-4.4.2$ ./local/lib/sympow/sympow
sympow 1.018 RELEASE (c) Mark Watkins --- see README and COPYING for details
It seems a strange decision to copy an
On 25 Mai, 09:07, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote:
combinations higher up.
[...]
Now that I understand the bug, my experience is it's best to sleep on
it, and tackle fixing it tomorrow. This way I've given myself a nice
outline towards doing that...
This is good practice not just for
I agree!
John
On 25 May 2010 08:44, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
When on builds 'sympow', a directory $SAGE_LOCAL/lib/sympow is made, and
the file 'sympow' executable copied there:
drkir...@hawk:~/sage-4.4.2$ ./local/lib/sympow/sympow
sympow 1.018 RELEASE (c) Mark
When on builds 'sympow', a directory $SAGE_LOCAL/lib/sympow is made, and
the file 'sympow' executable copied there:
drkir...@hawk:~/sage-4.4.2$ ./local/lib/sympow/sympow
sympow 1.018 RELEASE (c) Mark Watkins --- see README and COPYING for
details
It seems a strange decision to copy
On 25 Mai, 02:13, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 05/24/10 05:26 PM, leif wrote:
Looks like the (fairly old) gcc/g++ in /usr/local is misconfigured; it
definitely tries to link a 64-bit (x86_64) C++ program against the 32-
bit libstdc++.so (in /usr/local/lib) instead of
On May 25, 11:14 am, François Bissey f.r.bis...@massey.ac.nz wrote:
Hi,
sympow is a weird program. Not really completely standard. The problem
is the datafiles folder for the data generated by sympow must be in the
same folder as the one containing the executables and the sympow scripts.
Hi,
I am debugging a patch of my own. Perhaps due to the patch, I get the
following strange doctest failure.
sage -t 4.4.2/devel/sage-main/sage/modules/free_module.py
**
File
On May 25, 11:14 am, François Bissey f.r.bis...@massey.ac.nz wrote:
Thats no more correct on gentoo - I have written a set of sed commands
which fixes this behaviour:
http://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/blob/master/sci-mathematics/sympow
/sympow-1.018.ebuild
(see lines 27 to 55).
On 25 Mai, 11:18, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
What I wanted to say is that installing another version of gcc in /usr/
local on systems (like Linux distros) where there already is a
native one (gcc) in /usr is non-trivial, i.e. this doesn't work out
of the box.
With the native gcc,
On 25 Mai, 11:30, Kwankyu Lee ekwan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am debugging a patch of my own. Perhaps due to the patch, I get the
following strange doctest failure.
sage -t 4.4.2/devel/sage-main/sage/modules/free_module.py
On 25 Mai, 11:41, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
This is a known issue, and most probably ;-) not related to your
patch:
See e.g.http://groups.google.com/group/sage-release/msg/dac6cb862ecf6a8e
Direct link to the ticket:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9003
-Leif
--
To post to
Someone has just pointed out that the mpir.texi document, from which
our pdf documentation is generated contains:
@c @author Original version by Torbj@orn Granlund, Swox AB - modified
by William Hart
@c @email{goodwillh...@gmail.com}
So, not only did we not remove the original author
Hi Leif,
This doctest failure did not occur without applying my own patch, so I
thought my patch was the cause. A weird bug indeed...
Thank you for the pointers.
Kwankyu
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
On 25 Mai, 14:01, Kwankyu Lee ekwan...@gmail.com wrote:
This doctest failure did not occur without applying my own patch, so I
thought my patch was the cause. A weird bug indeed...
Interesting. Is this behavior reproducable (i.e. present in all test
runs)?
Is your patch on trac? This could
On May 25, 8:39 am, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
On 25 Mai, 14:01, Kwankyu Lee ekwan...@gmail.com wrote:
This doctest failure did not occur without applying my own patch, so I
thought my patch was the cause. A weird bug indeed...
Interesting. Is this behavior reproducable (i.e.
Hello, Bill.
Now, we are looking into why this isn't appearing on the title page of
the pdf documentation. That appears to be a technical issue! We will
also add The GMP Development Team as per the latest GMP
documentation.
I think that when you fix _everything_ someone still will be able
Oh, this is absolutely delicious!
Here is the author information from the gmp-4.2.1.tar.gz in doc/gmp.texi:
@c @author by Torbj@orn Granlund, Swox AB
@c @email{tege@@swox.com}
Note the @c comments here, which as far as I see, do indeed comment
out the author information!! I invite people to
Added information to the ticket http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9003
Kwankyu Lee
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
Fixed!
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9045
Note that the patch does not yet have any doctests. I'm waiting on a
better description of the graphs which caused the bug in the first
place. (Although we could use the graph6 strings for now, since having
this merged is probably pretty
+1 to using Graph6 strings, and I'll review this tomorrow.
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote:
Fixed!
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9045
Note that the patch does not yet have any doctests. I'm waiting on a
better description of the graphs
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Tom Boothby tomas.boot...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to using Graph6 strings, and I'll review this tomorrow.
OK, the doctest is in the patch, and all ready for review.
--
Robert L. Miller
http://www.rlmiller.org/
--
To post to this group, send an email to
Hello, Bill.
So it is established that we are being accused of academic fraud for
removing the author information WHEN IT WAS DONE BY SOMEONE ON THE GMP
TEAM in the actual version of GMP we forked from!!
Confirmed.
I think what is currently on the GMP website is FAR more damaging to
the
Hi all,
I just had a new spkg (rightly) rejected because it didn't have a
changelog entry in SPKG.txt , as specified by [1], Does anyone know
why are we manually keeping a text changelog when the files under our
control are already under revision control?
- Robert
[1]
My point is, imagine how damaging it will be to the author of those
comments if they just leave them there. Trust me, they'll go of their
own accord. We don't need to touch this one.
If someone else feels strongly that action needs to be taken, well I
won't be getting in their way. As for me, on
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
Hi all,
I just had a new spkg (rightly) rejected because it didn't have a changelog
entry in SPKG.txt , as specified by [1], Does anyone know why are we
manually keeping a text changelog when the files under
In fact, unless I am mistaken refresh your browser!
Now let's all forget this ever happened and let's get on with our jobs.
Bill.
On 25 May 2010 18:47, Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com wrote:
My point is, imagine how damaging it will be to the author of those
comments if they just
On May 25, 1:50 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
Hi all,
I just had a new spkg (rightly) rejected because it didn't have a changelog
entry in SPKG.txt , as specified by [1], Does anyone know
On 5/25/10 12:41 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Hi all,
I just had a new spkg (rightly) rejected because it didn't have a
changelog entry in SPKG.txt , as specified by [1], Does anyone know why
are we manually keeping a text changelog when the files under our
control are already under revision
On May 25, 2010, at 11:23 AM, kcrisman wrote:
On May 25, 1:50 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
Hi all,
I just had a new spkg (rightly) rejected because it didn't have a
changelog
entry in
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:23 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 25, 1:50 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
Hi all,
I just had a new spkg (rightly) rejected because it didn't have a
On May 25, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 5/25/10 12:41 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Hi all,
I just had a new spkg (rightly) rejected because it didn't have a
changelog entry in SPKG.txt , as specified by [1], Does anyone know
why
are we manually keeping a text changelog when the
On 5/25/10 1:23 PM, kcrisman wrote:
On May 25, 1:50 pm, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
Hi all,
I just had a new spkg (rightly) rejected because it didn't have a changelog
entry in SPKG.txt , as
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On May 25, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 5/25/10 12:41 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Hi all,
I just had a new spkg (rightly) rejected because it didn't have a
changelog entry in SPKG.txt , as
changelog, where it will scroll off the bottom and be forgotten. I'd
This is my main point, as well as for those who in the future will
just be learning hg and find going the right directory etc.
difficult.
As for HISTORY.txt, I don't understand why that isn't updated, since
On May 25, 2010, at 11:50 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On May 25, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 5/25/10 12:41 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Hi all,
I just had a new spkg (rightly) rejected because it
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:02 PM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
changelog, where it will scroll off the bottom and be forgotten. I'd
This is my main point, as well as for those who in the future will
just be learning hg and find going the right directory etc.
difficult.
sage -hg log
On 5/25/10 2:01 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On May 25, 2010, at 11:50 AM, William Stein wrote:
Having info about patches is a good idea. I'm definitely not
convinced SPKG.txt is the right place for it. I would install propose
something *like* for every patch foo, having a file foo.wtf (or
Hello, Bill.
In fact, unless I am mistaken refresh your browser!
Now let's all forget this ever happened and let's get on with our jobs.
+1!
--
With best regards,
Sergey mailto:sergey.bochka...@alglib.net
--
To post to this group, send an email to
On May 25, 3:05 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:02 PM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
changelog, where it will scroll off the bottom and be forgotten. I'd
This is my main point, as well as for those who in the future will
just be learning hg and
On May 25, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 5/25/10 2:01 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On May 25, 2010, at 11:50 AM, William Stein wrote:
Having info about patches is a good idea. I'm definitely not
convinced SPKG.txt is the right place for it. I
On May 25, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 5/25/10 2:01 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On May 25, 2010, at 11:50 AM, William Stein wrote:
Having info about patches is a good idea. I'm definitely not
convinced SPKG.txt is the right place for it. I
On 5/25/10 2:52 PM, William A. Stein wrote:
+1 to Robert's comments. Already, I don't ever make or use foo.patch files
anymore because they are completely redundant and one more easily-forgotten
step to make (they should be totally automated if they are required).
Interesting
I'm not
On May 25, 2010, at 12:35 PM, kcrisman wrote:
On May 25, 3:05 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:02 PM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com
wrote:
changelog, where it will scroll off the bottom and be forgotten.
I'd
This is my main point, as well as for those
Hello, everyone !
I've been looking for a function that allows one to compute Bezout
coefficients of two numbers (say natural numbers). There is the GCD
function, but I haven't found anything about Bezout coefficients. This
is not complicated to write one, but it would be better if it was
On May 24, 9:11 pm, ablondin alexandre.blondin.ma...@gmail.com
wrote:
You're right ! It doesn't work with the view() function. On the other
hand, when I select latex instead of sage and I enter the command
\sage{A()}
it displays 123 on the first line and 23 on the second line, with the
2's
And I reiterate that I recall somewhere a suggestion on sage-devel
that commit messages should be one line long. Does no one else
remember that? Or did it mean it should not have any carriage
returns, but be as long as it wants (in which case this was not clear
at all)?
Only the
Hello,
I've been looking for a function that allows one to compute Bezout
coefficients of two numbers (say natural numbers). There is the GCD
function, but I haven't found anything about Bezout coefficients. This
is not complicated to write one, but it would be better if it was
included
On 5/25/10 2:56 PM, William A. Stein wrote:
On May 25, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 5/25/10 2:01 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On May 25, 2010, at 11:50 AM, William Stein wrote:
Having info about patches is a good idea. I'm definitely not
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:56 PM, William A. Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting. If I remember correctly, you and I had a long discussion about
those patch files, in which I was totally against them, and you argued for
them. I think they are there now mostly because of you. I'm
On 5/25/10 3:07 PM, kcrisman wrote:
There remains one additional problem. If we have been putting long
information into SPKG.txt for a while with almost no information in
the commit messages, getting rid of the SPKG.txt ones will leave a
fairly large piece of their history mysterious at
On May 25, 2010, at 1:11 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 5/25/10 2:56 PM, William A. Stein wrote:
On May 25, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Jason Groutjason-
s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 5/25/10 2:01 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On May 25, 2010, at 11:50 AM, William Stein wrote:
Having info about
On May 25, 2010, at 1:17 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 5/25/10 3:07 PM, kcrisman wrote:
There remains one additional problem. If we have been putting long
information into SPKG.txt for a while with almost no information in
the commit messages, getting rid of the SPKG.txt ones will leave a
Is anyone else getting duplicate copies of Sage messages? -- Tim
Mike Hansen wrote:
Hello,
I've been looking for a function that allows one to compute Bezout
coefficients of two numbers (say natural numbers). There is the GCD
function, but I haven't found anything about Bezout
Thanks !
I would never have guessed the name !
Alex
On 25 mai, 16:28, Tim Daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
Is anyone else getting duplicate copies of Sage messages? -- Tim
Mike Hansen wrote:
Hello,
I've been looking for a function that allows one to compute Bezout
coefficients of
Way to go... this would be excellent - instant scalable sage
computing:
check out the kind of thing BIx folks are doing for the community:
http://bcbio.wordpress.com/2010/05/08/automated-build-environment-for-bioinformatics-cloud-images/
You have to get sage into this party - actually I think a
On May 25, 2010, at 1:42 PM, ablondin wrote:
Thanks !
I would never have guessed the name !
Alex
And I had never heard of the term Bezout coefficients :). The is an
abbreviation for extended gcd.
On 25 mai, 16:28, Tim Daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
Is anyone else getting duplicate
Hi,
If you've very interested in attending Sage Days 23
http://wiki.sagemath.org/days23
Please send me an offlist email. There may be some funding left for
additional people (mainly lodging and possibly travel within Europe).
It would be good to have a few more people around at that
I couldnt see a solution to this in this thread so heres a related question
The following produces the exact output Id like to produce (to assign to the
_repr_ property of a class)
%latex
N(\mu,\sigma^2)
How can I set things up to do this in a (_repr_) function (as a sage
statement/function
Hello,
I propose to make Cephes ( http://moshier.net/ and
http://www.netlib.org/cephes/ ) a standard SPKG in Sage. In order to
complete the Cygwin port on Windows, we need support for c99 complex
numbers which the SPKG provides (amongst other things). The SPKG can
be found at #8780. The spkg
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I propose to make Cephes ( http://moshier.net/ and
http://www.netlib.org/cephes/ ) a standard SPKG in Sage. In order to
complete the Cygwin port on Windows, we need support for c99 complex
numbers which the SPKG
Is license info available?
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I propose to make Cephes ( http://moshier.net/ and
http://www.netlib.org/cephes/ ) a standard SPKG in Sage. In order to
complete the Cygwin port on Windows, we need support for c99
On 5/25/10 8:49 PM, David Joyner wrote:
Is license info available?
According to http://www.netlib.org/cephes/readme
Some software in this archive may be from the book _Methods and
Programs for Mathematical Functions_ (Prentice-Hall or Simon Schuster
International, 1989) or from the
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 5/25/10 8:49 PM, David Joyner wrote:
Is license info available?
According to http://www.netlib.org/cephes/readme
Some software in this archive may be from the book _Methods and
Programs for Mathematical
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 5/25/10 8:49 PM, David Joyner wrote:
Is license info available?
It's included in Debian as GPL -- we can just obtain a copy from them. See
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 5/25/10 8:49 PM, David Joyner wrote:
Is license info available?
It's included in Debian as GPL -- we can just obtain a copy from them.
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 7:05 PM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 5/25/10 8:49 PM, David Joyner wrote:
Is license info available?
Please see http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9003 for
details. The reason I'm bringing this up on sage-devel is that
apparently (I can't really believe this is the actual reason, which is
why I say apparently) the following changeset causes a totally
unrelated failure - one which does NOT
In fact, I'm not sure the term Bezout coefficients is standard, but
you can find it on Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%A9zout%27s_identity
They also call these Bezout numbers, since they're linked to the
Bezout identity.
Alex
On 25 mai, 16:44, Robert Bradshaw
On 26 May 2010 02:16, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I propose to make Cephes ( http://moshier.net/ and
http://www.netlib.org/cephes/ ) a standard SPKG in Sage. In order to
complete the Cygwin port on Windows, we need support for c99 complex
numbers which the SPKG provides
74 matches
Mail list logo
