Dear Sage-Combinat devs, Mike, Nicolas,
A good news: thanks to #8680, from sage 4.5.1 on, sage -t will
complain if we inadvertently introduce tabs in our code. #8680 also
removed all remaining tabs in the current sage sources.
So the bad news is that a couple of our patches in the queue
Gentle reminders:
* Please remember to include the ticket number in the first line of the
commit string of each Mercurial patch. This makes it much easier to
find the ticket for a particular changeset with 'hg log some_file.py'.
* Please remember to update ticket Author(s) and Reviewer(s).
Is there any chance you could write an email explaining the basic
ideas behind your new factorization implementation? I'm just curious
what goes into it. Even something along the lines of this page would
be nice:
http://magma.maths.usyd.edu.au/magma/htmlhelp/text315.htm
-- William
Yes. I do not speak English.
I use a translator of Google.
Why unpacking: sage-4.5-linux-32bit-ubuntu_10.04_lts-i686-
Linux.tar.lzma
I get the message about the impossibility of creating hard links?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
Hi,
here I put some technical info about how to publish your own book at lulu.com:
http://ondrejcertik.blogspot.com/2010/07/theoretical-physics-reference-book.html
Overall it cost me $20 and I am now having the physical hardcover book
in my hands.
Ondrej
--
To post to this group, send an
Hi there!
An alternative would be to to patch distutils to obey some environment
variable.
I backported the --no-user-cfg stuff in python's distutils and added
an environment variable for simplifying the usage.
The patched skpg is here:
Hi!
I've used python very little, so my skills in that are poor, so I am
not going to suggest what may or may not be the best way to do this.
However, I will point you at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9551
Maybe the python patch will also work for you.
Best regards,
Alexander
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 07:54:14PM +0100, David Kirkby wrote:
I don't know, but suspect so. This page looked interesting, to preload
a Solaris malloc library with LD_PRELOAD. That seemed to display
something semi-useful after I inspected the core file with 'mdb' and
used this 'findleaks
I am having trouble with sage -pkg to make a new spkg from a directory
my-spkg/. (I have done this before). Am I doing something stupid?
After typing
sage -pkg my-spkg
nothing apparently happens (no new prompt) BUT a file with the right
name my-spkg.spkg is being created in the current
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 7:37 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having trouble with sage -pkg to make a new spkg from a directory
my-spkg/. (I have done this before). Am I doing something stupid?
After typing
sage -pkg my-spkg
nothing apparently happens (no new prompt)
On 20 July 2010 16:24, Carl Witty carl.wi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 7:37 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having trouble with sage -pkg to make a new spkg from a directory
my-spkg/. (I have done this before). Am I doing something stupid?
After typing
The following came to light while woring on #9343 (pari upgrade) which
I thought deserved a wider circulation. John
Amazing discovery -- the script spkg-install is VERY broken, even the one
currently distributed with sage 4.5! (pari-2.3.5.p1)
There are several lines like
{{{
# pjeremy: fix
That's relief -- thanks. I think my mind is frying, as it is hot
humid (well, by English standards). Now I see what is happening. It
is easy to get confused since under the src/ directorythere is another
one called src, so some of the targets for cp do start src
John
On 20 July 2010
On Jul 17, 8:18 pm, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
I wouldn't call this a postdoc. It is non-tenure track position that
requires teaching. The blurb doesn't mention
how much teaching or how much money. Actually, the ad doesn't call it
a postdoc either.
RJF
Whatever the position is officially
Hello,
I did write two almost complete patches for hyperbolic geometry
(#9439) and plotting fundamental domains of subgroups of PSL(2,Z)
(#9557). I'm not so interested in plotting fundamental domains of the
standard congruence groups but it would be very nice to put all that
in a generic
On 2010-Jul-19 23:20:40 +0100, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
How about an extension to the standard environment variable parsing
so that SAGE_FOO_bar is equivalent to (and overrides) SAGE_FOO in
package 'bar' only? This allows variables to be overridden for
specific
On 07/20/10 07:42 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2010-Jul-19 23:20:40 +0100, Dr. David Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
So if I understand you correctly,
SAGE_NUM_THREADS=10
would set 10 threads globally in Sage, but
SAGE_NUM_THREADS_ATLAS=1
would override the 10 to 1 (single threaded)
In a previous discussion, OpenModelica was considered as a new Sage
addition, but was dropped because their license is apparently
incompatible with GPL.
However, JModelica seems like a viable alternative. Please see the
following excerpt from a private correspondence between me and
William:
A computer science postdoc would typically be purely research funded.
Any teaching would be optional.
There are lecturer/ instructor positions with low teaching
requirements (for lecturers) that are intended to
fund young people so they can do research. There used to be (maybe no
longer) Miller
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:58 PM, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
A computer science postdoc would typically be purely research funded.
This is an ad for a math postdoc.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
Unfortunately, I have no log of this. I think that what we did was to
make it run under the sage -sh shell, so that it was possible to do
from sage import * at the beginning of any python file and achieving
something pretty usable.
Sorry for missing details
Maurizio
On 18 Lug, 02:29, Nicolas M.
Jmodelica seems to be very interesting... but from
http://www.jmodelica.org/page/14
(or see the copy below) they argue that the software is their property
(is that a problem for inclusion in Sage?). On the other hand very few
is said about the user license The code base is provided under
standard
On Jul 20, 1:58 pm, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
The issue to me is the extent to which a person in such a position is
unfairly exploited.
Right. As kcrisman says, this doesn't happen that much in math: we
don't have tasks like sequencing DNA or building circuit boards that
we can foist off
Hi!
On 20 Jul., 23:46, Vincent D 20100.delecr...@gmail.com wrote:
...
* You assign and transfer the copyright of your JModelica.org
contribution to the Project owner to the extent permitted by
applicable law. In return you receive back a broad license to re-use
and distribute your
Hi,
I have a question that I thought was a simple python question, but I was
unable to find the answer on the internet.
Suppose I want to find out if root is a valid keyword argument for the
is_square function of an object a. Is there a good way to do this?
I tried the following for
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Vincent D 20100.delecr...@gmail.com wrote:
Jmodelica seems to be very interesting... but from
http://www.jmodelica.org/page/14
(or see the copy below) they argue that the software is their property
(is that a problem for inclusion in Sage?). On the other hand
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Marco Streng marco.str...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a question that I thought was a simple python question, but I was
unable to find the answer on the internet.
Suppose I want to find out if root is a valid keyword argument for the
is_square function of an
On Jul 20, 6:51 pm, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
[...] if in the
future a particular department got a reputation for exploiting its
post-docs, it would have a harder time hiring people. Word gets
around pretty fast.
I would like to shoot down your blind faith in market
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 3:43 AM, 3DRaven 3dra...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes. I do not speak English.
I use a translator of Google.
Why unpacking: sage-4.5-linux-32bit-ubuntu_10.04_lts-i686-
Linux.tar.lzma
I get the message about the impossibility of creating hard links?
I just checked the file and
Somewhat related to this subject - is it possible to automatically put
into documentation parameters that were defined and documented in the
base method'? E.g. if I have
class A():
def f(self, a=1):
INPUT:
- ``a`` -- integer
...
class B(A):
def f(self, b=2, *args, **kwds):
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev novos...@gmail.com wrote:
Somewhat related to this subject - is it possible to automatically put
into documentation parameters that were defined and documented in the
base method'? E.g. if I have
You could make a decorator which modifies
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:43 AM, dagss da...@student.matnat.uio.no wrote:
On Jul 11, 12:20 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
2. Sage at EuroScipy:
Another thing -- though most talks mention Cython, not one single talk
given about actual engineers/scientists doing work even mentioned
Hello all,
When building from source, I can set MAKE and have the Sage library
build in parallel. Is there a way I can do the same thing when using
sage -b? In analogy to sage -t and sage -tp, it would be nice to
have sage -bp.
Dan
--
--- Dan Drake
- http://mathsci.kaist.ac.kr/~drake
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Dan Drake dr...@kaist.edu wrote:
Hello all,
When building from source, I can set MAKE and have the Sage library
build in parallel. Is there a way I can do the same thing when using
sage -b? In analogy to sage -t and sage -tp, it would be nice to
have sage
34 matches
Mail list logo
