I am trying to construct the fee module on the set of instances of a
class G.
I start with
M = CombinatorialFreeModule(QQ,G)
If f,g are instances of G I then continue with
a = M.monomial(f)
b = M.monomial(g)
and I can then form a+a , a+b etc. and a - a is indeed 0.
However if I try 2*a I get
Hi Bruce,
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 03:33:21AM -0700, Bruce wrote:
I am trying to construct the fee module on the set of instances of a
class G.
I start with
M = CombinatorialFreeModule(QQ,G)
If f,g are instances of G I then continue with
a = M.monomial(f)
b = M.monomial(g)
On Sep 2, 3:33 am, Bruce brucewestb...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to construct the fee module on the set of instances of a
class G.
It would be good to give a complete example, that is, with a
particular G.
Can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong and/or explain this?
Thanks
--
You
O.K. Then a minimal example to start with would be
class G:
blah = 0
f = G()
g = G()
On Sep 2, 3:00 pm, bump b...@match.stanford.edu wrote:
On Sep 2, 3:33 am, Bruce brucewestb...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to construct the fee module on the set of instances of a
class G.
It would
Hi Florent
I am not sure if you mean it is a bug that a + b works or that 2*a
doesn't.
The documentation describes a Parent as a set. In these terms the
Parent
I want is the set of instances of the class G. I don't know how to
construct
this as a Parent or even if this is allowed.
On Sep 2,
I have played around following Florent's comment and the following
seems to work
(while at the same time displaying my ignorance)
class G:
blah = 0
f =G()
g=G()
p=parent(f)
M=CombinatorialFreeModule(QQ,p)
a=M.monomial(f)
b=M.monomial(g)
(2/3)*a+(4/5)*b
--
You received this message
Hi Bruce,
Incidentally, the following works for me, with sage 4.5.2, which I think
was your minimal counter-example. Did I misunderstand? What version of
sage are you using?
sage: class G:
: blah = 0
:
sage: f = G()
sage: g = G()
sage: M = CombinatorialFreeModule(QQ, G)
sage: a =
On Sep 2, 3:33 am, Bruce brucewestb...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to construct the free module on the set of instances of a
class G.
Did you also ask this on ask.sagemath.org? I've posted some possibly
related ideas in the thread http://ask.sagemath.org/question/94/using-
On 2 Sep, 05:55, François Bissey f.r.bis...@massey.ac.nz wrote:
Who would agree with making this a policy and so adding to the Sage
Developers Guide a few sentences saying that any updates of packages
that are not to a stable release (i.e snapshots, alpha, beta, release
candidates
Hi Mitesh,
On Sep 2, 12:42 am, Mitesh Patel qed...@gmail.com wrote:
...
If you still have a copy of the hanging package directory, could you
try print-debugging to isolate the problem? Possibilities include the
system calls to 'tar' and to 'sage -hg diff'.
I reconstructed the hanging
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 9/1/10 10:32 AM, Bill Hart wrote:
Tim,
all screwing around aside for a moment. I broadly agree with your
sentiments. However, there are also some issues with what you are
suggesting. And I mean to make these
As you may have noticed, if you create a ticket on trac, the default component
is algebra, as that is the first component in alphabetical order.
That means anyone that forgets to set a component properly will get it set to
algebra and it assigned to AlexGhitza.
I've added a component PLEASE
William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 9/1/10 10:32 AM, Bill Hart wrote:
Tim,
all screwing around aside for a moment. I broadly agree with your
sentiments. However, there are also some issues with what you are
A few questions I have about trac.
1) There are components of graph theory and group_theory. Is the underscore
on group_theory supposed to make it less easy to confuse with graph theory,
or is it just a mistake and so the underscore should be removed?
2) Should there be a linear programming
Hello everybody,
I'm looking for a suitable PhD candidate for a position at the
Fraunhofer ITWM in Kaiserslautern, Germany.
The topic is Industrial Algebra :
Hopefully, there's somebody out there with the following skills:
* Computer Algebra, in particular Gröbner methods
* Experience with at
PS: You may also use Reply to Author to contact me.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
On Sep 2, 5:28 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com
wrote:
On 9/1/10 10:32 AM, Bill Hart wrote:
Tim,
all screwing around aside for a moment. I broadly agree with your
sentiments. However, there are also
On Sep 1, 11:33 pm, Niles nil...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a screenshot of some very basic changes, using the
colors from sagemath.org:
http://www.nilesjohnson.net/sage-style-docs.png
Nice, but some time ago I picked some colors for the website and if
I'll ever give it some refreshment, at
After a while, I decided to see how hard this might be to change . . .
as you would expect, it was totally trivial (at least for a first
pass). Here's a screenshot of some very basic changes, using the
colors from sagemath.org:
http://www.nilesjohnson.net/sage-style-docs.png
That's a
Is it pronounced Piss-ige or Pee-Sage? What does the P stand for?
I know that dogs, etc. mark locations this way, so maybe that has to
do with geometry?
see sage-flame for a snarkier comment.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
Hello all,
A ticket for this now exists at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9850
and it contains the patch with a screenshot.
On Sep 1, 9:21 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 9/1/10 5:17 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
The
sick green has always been a bit jarring to my
On 09/ 2/10 06:10 AM, rjf wrote:
the mathematica syntax parser that I wrote appears to run inside
Maxima, so
you can, if you wish, feed such text to the mma-in-maxima system.
Sorry to sound green, but I barely know Maxima, and do not know Lisp at all.
I do know Mathematica - though I'm
On Sep 2, 1:59 pm, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Does this discussion belong (also) on sage-marketing, by the way?
Indeed; I'm forwarding it now.
Dear sage-marketing,
Here's the link to the beginning of this thread
On Sep 2, 2:23 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 09/ 2/10 06:10 AM, rjf wrote:
the mathematica syntax parser that I wrote appears to run inside
Maxima, so
you can, if you wish, feed such text to the mma-in-maxima system.
Sorry to sound green, but I barely know
On 09/02/2010 03:17 AM, Simon King wrote:
On Sep 2, 12:42 am, Mitesh Patel qed...@gmail.com wrote:
...
If you still have a copy of the hanging package directory, could you
try print-debugging to isolate the problem? Possibilities include the
system calls to 'tar' and to 'sage -hg diff'.
I
Hello sagemath.org web people,
I have a link to
http://www.sagemath.org/why/muntingh-sage-review/muntingh-sage-review/node2.html
which is broken. There's a link to the same kind of page from
http://wiki.sagemath.org/SAGE_in_the_News which is also broken. Can
someone with access to the
Hi Dan,
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Dan Drake dr...@kaist.edu wrote:
Hello sagemath.org web people,
I have a link to
http://www.sagemath.org/why/muntingh-sage-review/muntingh-sage-review/node2.html
which is broken.
I think that broken link came about during the redesign of the library
27 matches
Mail list logo
