Ops, but all those comments are assuming that #7922 is applied,
which I still haven't reviewed ... Ok, that going up my TODO pile ...
The code snippet I posted does not assume #7922.
At this moment #7922 needs work since it changes the
syntax of a few things enough to break some tests in
Nicolas wrote:
This looks very related to what Vivianne (and Adrien and Nicolas) is
implementing around Schubert polynomials and the like. Vivianne: can
you already compute demazure characters with your code?
(WeylCharacterRing is basically the group algebra of the ambient
lattice)? If yes,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 06:11:18AM -0800, Daniel Bump wrote:
The code snippet I posted does not assume #7922.
Yup, only my comments about it :-)
At this moment #7922 needs work since it changes the syntax of a few
things enough to break some tests in the tutorial #8442, which has
been
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 07:05:27AM -0800, bump wrote:
No, the WeylCharacterRing is the representation ring of the Lie
group. A basis is indexed by dominant characters. The WeightRing
is the group algebra of the lattice.
Oops, thanks for catching this; I indeed meant WeightRing.
Cheers,
Hi all,
Thanks for the replies. I'm on the sage-combinat-devel list now.
I don't know if it's helpful to post so much code, but here is my code
for the Demazure character and rank 2 plotting. The Demazure character
code contains the same idea as bump's code.
def demazure(ch, i):
I don't know if it's helpful to post so much code, but here is my code
for the Demazure character and rank 2 plotting. The Demazure character
code contains the same idea as bump's code.
There were a couple of mistakes in the code snippet that I posted.
Here is another attempt, probably
On 31 Jan., 07:13, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Emil Widmann emil.widm...@gmail.com wrote:
But.
I strongly resent the comments and spirit of Prof. Fateman. Using
classifications like losers and winners, top producers and junk
submitters he
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
On 31 Jan., 07:13, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Emil Widmann emil.widm...@gmail.com wrote:
But.
I strongly resent the comments and spirit of Prof. Fateman. Using
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Timothy Clemans
timothy.clem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
On 31 Jan., 07:13, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Emil Widmann emil.widm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:18 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Timothy Clemans
timothy.clem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
On 31 Jan., 07:13, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun,
On 1/30/11 4:42 PM, Jonathan wrote:
Ivan,
I am aware that you've been working on this. However, I have not had
any time to look at it. If things go well with my classes and
administrative responsibilities in the next couple of weeks I may get
a chance. I am very glad you have worked on this.
On 1/31/11 5:49 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote:
I think the first step is making it so one can easily edit the
notebook if they built Sage from source. The test notebook would
automatically be launched. Once you've launched the notebook you
shouldn't have to touch the command line.
That's an
On 1/29/11 9:52 AM, rjf wrote:
Even assuming that the junk-submitter takes no time at all from
project management on the front end, the need to review
contributions
is certainly a drain. Realizing, and then explaining to some loser
why his code is junk takes time.
Ironically, reading much of
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 1/31/11 5:49 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote:
I think the first step is making it so one can easily edit the
notebook if they built Sage from source. The test notebook would
automatically be launched. Once you've
On 1/31/11 6:31 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 1/31/11 5:49 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote:
I think the first step is making it so one can easily edit the
notebook if they built Sage from source. The test notebook
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 1/31/11 6:31 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 1/31/11 5:49 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote:
I think the first step is making it so one
Hi all,
I'm trying to compile Sage 4.6.1 on openSUSE 11.2 x86_64 and have encountered
the same bug I reported on May 16 last year with Sage 4.4.1.
http://www.mail-archive.com/sage-devel@googlegroups.com/msg38879.html
Th fix is to move -lm to the right place on the command line. See diff
below.
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 02:49:03AM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
+1 I might not consolidate to 2 lists, but the -algebra one at least
is very low traffic and often highly relevant to sage-devel (and
anything not mentioned here is probably even lower).
If I recall correctly, every message to
My suggestions for improvements would be:
Consolidate the forum. It is the main communication platform of the
project (together with the trac system). It might be a good idea to
reduce to maybe 3 google groups (Devel, Support, Users). One thing
that bogs me is that in the current groups
I think a cool thing would be a forum for users, where they can
present their work with sage and also interact and work together on a
project. ...
Why don't you research open source web apps that
could provide something like that?
preliminary:
On Feb 1, 2:27 am, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you still using gcc 4.4.1? I'm actually surprised that you were able to
compile the rest of Sage with that compiler.
I've made a trac ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10719
and an updated spkg:
Hi Volker
On Feb 1, 2:27 am, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
I've made a trac ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10719
and an updated spkg:
http://www.stp.dias.ie/~vbraun/Sage/spkg/symmetrica-2.0.p6.spkg
Thanks again. I tested your spkg. It doesn't work. You also
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 1/31/11 5:49 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote:
I think the first step is making it so one can easily edit the
notebook if they built Sage from source. The test notebook would
automatically be launched. Once you've
Upon a closer look at the symmetrica spkg I noticed a lot of other oddities.
Particularly ironic is the fact that the binary that fails to link on your
machine is actually not used. I've updated my spkg
(http://www.stp.dias.ie/~vbraun/Sage/spkg/symmetrica-2.0.p6.spkg), can you
give it another
On 01/30/11 03:27 PM, Jonathan wrote:
As one of the non-mathematicians (as a physical chemist who teaches
quantum mechanics and kinetics = nonlinear differential equations and
systems of differential equations, I'm not sure that is quite the
right term, but I think you get the idea), I thought
25 matches
Mail list logo
