Hi,
What's the problem with raising a NotImplementedError for a method
that is not implemented?
I don't have a problem with that, but I tent to prefer not to have
methods available (see below) which are not implemented anyway.
Why should one want that these methods are
deactivated? What
On 13 Mai, 13:22, Christian Stump christian.st...@lacim.ca wrote:
I feel like the tab completion is often so long, that it is quite hard
to find some method. So why not removing all methods from this list
which I cannot use anyway? I think it is also annoying to find and try
to use some method
I'm forwarding to the sage-combinat group, where the people who know
this code well have a better chance of seeing it.
On 05/12/2011 06:19 PM, Matthias wrote:
Hi,
i don't really know whether this is a bug, but at least it seems a bit
odd to me (are alphacheck supposed to have different
On 5/12/11 11:38 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
If I have a Sage expression, I can do
latex(foo)
to get LaTeX code. Is there an inverse to that function?
Frequently, I do a calculation in Sage and get something complicated. I
find it easier to look at when typeset by TeX, so I call latex(), paste
Dear all,
I did two simple spkg (Sage package) one for SUNDIALS and another for
Assimulo.
These are very thin wrappers on the original source code, no patches.
Here are the links, (Dropbox in the lack of a better place :) )
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/29028094/sundials-2.4.0.spkg
Hello,
Asimulo seems great: it does exactly what I wanted to do: integrate
Radau5 in Sage. Radau5 is from far the best method for the integration
of (very) stiff ODEs...
Le 13/05/2011 10:30, Guilherme a écrit :
Dear all,
I did two simple spkg (Sage package) one for SUNDIALS and another for
So what you have in mind is:
* automatically generate the list of files from *sequential* builds,
store it in spkg (or possibly somewhere else)
* use this in all default builds (either parallel or sequential), Sage
would store the list of files somewhere, and use it for uninstall
Is that
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 5:25 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
Ooch ! That's bad indeed, and it is probably my fault...
I think it was my fault, not Nathann's. It seems to be a problem
in a function _slider01 which is internal
to the ryser algorithm used by gale_ryser_theorem.
A
Hi
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 09:28:38AM -0700, Lilavati wrote:
On 24 Kwi, 15:26, pipedream jan.groenew...@gmail.com wrote:
We expect below spkg to be in sage 4.7.1. In the meantime, if you
runUbuntu11.04(Natty)
and stable sage 4.6.2, you can replace SAGE_ROOT/spkg/standard/
On 5/13/11, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 5/12/11 11:38 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
If I have a Sage expression, I can do
latex(foo)
to get LaTeX code. Is there an inverse to that function?
Frequently, I do a calculation in Sage and get something complicated. I
find it
Hi,
On 7 Mai, 07:04, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 6, 9:12 pm, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi:
The contribution at #10153 byThomasFeulneris huge and,
IMHO, important. It basically generalizes what Robert Miller did for
automorphisms of codes in the binary
On 5/13/11 6:00 AM, Bruno Le Floch wrote:
On 5/13/11, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 5/12/11 11:38 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
If I have a Sage expression, I can do
latex(foo)
to get LaTeX code. Is there an inverse to that function?
Frequently, I do a calculation in Sage
FYI
http://www.maplesoft.com/products/maple/new_features/index.aspx?P=TC-1975
Among other things, they are *really* touting their multi-core and GPU
use (as opposed to Mma) and there is also a lot of talk about their
sharing features. I have a feeling that some of their claims about
On 05/12/2011 09:38:46 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
If I have a Sage expression, I can do
latex(foo)
to get LaTeX code. Is there an inverse to that function?
Frequently, I do a calculation in Sage and get something complicated.
I
find it easier to look at when typeset by TeX, so I call latex(),
2011/5/13 kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com:
FYI
http://www.maplesoft.com/products/maple/new_features/index.aspx?P=TC-1975
Among other things, they are *really* touting their multi-core and GPU
use (as opposed to Mma) and there is also a lot of talk about their
sharing features.
I looked at that
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
Hello all,
At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it
would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see
whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I will release
On May 13, 9:51 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/5/13 kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com:
FYI
http://www.maplesoft.com/products/maple/new_features/index.aspx?P=TC-...
Among other things, they are *really* touting their multi-core and GPU
use (as opposed to Mma) and there is
I wrote a script to create a virtual machine with Sage and export it as an
OVA appliance. I'm using VirtualBox but I think VMware should support it,
too. At this point it would be useful if people could try it out on a
variety of host machines. I built the following Sage appliance to test:
Hi Thierry
On May 13, 11:04 am, Thierry Dumont tdum...@math.univ-lyon1.fr
wrote:
Hello,
Asimulo seems great: it does exactly what I wanted to do: integrate
Radau5 in Sage. Radau5 is from far the best method for the integration
of (very) stiff ODEs...
I couldn't find an Assimulo example
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:35 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, May 10, 2011 2:38:38 PM UTC-7, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com
wrote:
IMHO the list of installed files is an integral piece of package
On 13 Maj, 11:59, Jan Groenewald j...@aims.ac.za wrote:
The last command there is sage -br, and it perhaps rebuilt the p9 spkg?
Try just do again
sage -f http://users.aims.ac.za/~jan/python-2.6.4.p10.spkg
It helped! Thanks. :)
I don't really get how, since I had removed the p9 spkg
I believe they are advertising on SDMP polynomial multiplication for
the parallel symbolic compution. TRIP has an interesting benchmarks
about that:
http://www.imcce.fr/Equipes/ASD/trip/features.php
I'm curious to know if performance of Maple 15 are following the same
as for Maple 14.
--
To post
$ export SAGE_PARALLEL_SPKG_BUILD=yes
$ export MAKE='make -j8'
$ make
See the installation guide for information about the relevant environment
variables. I think that we should set SAGE_PARALLEL_SPKG_BUILD to yes
automatically -- it works very well, according to everyone I've talked
On 05/13/11 07:45 PM, kcrisman wrote:
$ export SAGE_PARALLEL_SPKG_BUILD=yes
$ export MAKE='make -j8'
$ make
See the installation guide for information about the relevant environment
variables. I think that we should set SAGE_PARALLEL_SPKG_BUILD to yes
automatically -- it works very well,
Thanks, this works... sometimes. But the following still fails:
sage: G = QuaternionGroup()
sage: H = direct_product_permgroups([G, G])
sage: K= direct_product_permgroups([H, G])
Gap produced error output
Syntax error: expression expected
$sage17:=permutation group with 6 generators;;
^
I do not have too many versions of Sage available to me at the moment,
but:
Your example works properly on 4.6.2.alpha3
Your example fails on 4.6.2.alpha4 and 4.7.rc0
The failure is at the same place as in the initial report.
Pierre - What version are you using?
The only ticket merged
On May 12, 11:13 pm, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
Hello all,
At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it
would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see
whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I will release sage-4.7
I'm curious to know if performance of Maple 15 are following the same as
for Maple 14.
Very similar. SDMP was refactored for Maple 15. It's size was cut in half,
it was made re-entrant to allow parallel polynomial algorithms, and we now
support Zp for multiprecision p. We added Kronecker
28 matches
Mail list logo
