How to use the new option for building smaller binaries?
Is it make micro_relase, or do I have to use sage -strip after the
build?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For
On 11 Nov., 19:16, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
Is there a requirement that all Sage .py files should be ASCII or is
UTF8 also accepted?
It seems that Sphinx 1.1.2 (#10620) cares more about this: at #10112
there is a patch with a 0xd0 byte (which is neither ASCII neither
I have built Sage successfully on Debian 6.0.0 through 6.0.3 on AMD,
both in virtual machines (VirtualBox under Windows Vista with 1 Gig
memory)
and physical. The most recent change to the Atlas package that allows
me to
specify architecture=fast has speeded things up considerably, i.e. it
takes
I too recall that the Sage library was supposed to be 7-bit clean (I
think Volker mentioned this on IRC once). But I see no problem with
extending this to UTF-8 if need be, for example to allow authors to be
credited when their names contain characters not found in ASCII. This is
recommended
2011/11/11 Francois Bissey francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:59 PM, frosty jfoster81...@gmail.com wrote:
I have just discovered Sage want to know if there are any folks here
working on making a Debian version that would work without having to
compile all the
You can just do `make micro_release` in $SAGE_ROOT. It calls a Python
script William wrote to do the stripping etc. This should be done AFTER
doing everything else you want to do in terms of building / compiling / etc.
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to
On Friday, November 11, 2011 10:16:16 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
Is there a requirement that all Sage .py files should be ASCII or is
UTF8 also accepted?
It seems that Sphinx 1.1.2 (#10620) cares more about this: at #10112
there is a patch with a 0xd0 byte (which is neither ASCII
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 07:15:27AM +1300, Francois Bissey wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Dan Drake dr...@kaist.edu wrote:
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 at 09:16PM -0500, Daniel Thau wrote:
Yeah, I considered that possibility. The md5sum for both the
pre-compiled
version I
Hi,
I just increased the timeout= option for all http://*.sagenb.org
servers from 10 minutes to 1 hour, and am restarting all the public
servers now. This may have interesting side effects. Let me know.
-- William
--
William Stein
Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
Hell !!!
I'm ok with not being able to contract in a bipartite graph. I'm ok with
being presented with an error. I'm NOT ok with my original graph suddenly
being rubbish! (The net effect of merge_vertices is to delete vertex 4 in
this case, which makes no sense).
You are right on this
Hello,
I got an error while compiling sage-4.7.2 on my computer (Intel core 2
Duo T8100) at the very begining. I should mention that on the same
computer sage-4.7.1 compiles. Does anybody encounter such a problem or
have a solution ?
$ uname -a
Linux jahe 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Sep 9 20:23:16
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Vincent D 20100.delecr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I got an error while compiling sage-4.7.2 on my computer (Intel core 2
Duo T8100) at the very begining. I should mention that on the same
computer sage-4.7.1 compiles. Does anybody encounter such a problem or
On Saturday, November 12, 2011 5:21:07 PM UTC-8, François wrote:
Hi,
I spotted those two files and I am wondering what they are
used for.
sage-sage.py looks like a rewrite of sage-sage in python, is it ever
called
from anywhere or is it a work in progress of some kind?
This file
It's still 4.7.
It would be great if it's bumped up to the current version...
Thanks,
Dima
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
On Saturday, November 12, 2011 9:29:29 PM UTC-8, François wrote:
On Saturday, November 12, 2011 5:21:07 PM UTC-8, François wrote:
Hi,
I spotted those two files and I am wondering what they are
used for.
sage-sage.py looks like a rewrite of sage-sage in python, is it ever
indeed, it looks as if libstdc++ (-dev) packages aren't fully installed.
Try running
aptitude install libstdc++-dev
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options,
I'll look into it.
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
It's still 4.7.
It would be great if it's bumped up to the current version...
Thanks,
Dima
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group,
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 11:10 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll look into it.
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
It's still 4.7.
I can't easily upgrade because of the bug that makes upgrading
completely broken these days (I forget who or what
18 matches
Mail list logo
